Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

5
Posts
0
Votes
Rose Han
0
Votes |
5
Posts

"duplex" on R-1 zone

Rose Han
Posted

Newbie here! Any advice for "duplex" on R1 zone? Risks associated, any possible solutions? Or best to just avoid altogether? Tax record shows SFR. Thank you!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

6,494
Posts
7,549
Votes
Dan H.
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
7,549
Votes |
6,494
Posts
Dan H.
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
Replied
Originally posted by @Rose Han:
Originally posted by @Seth Borman:

A duplex in an SFR zone isn't necessarily a problem. The bigger issue is that the tax rolls don't reflect two units.

You need to get permit records to know what you are dealing with.

If you are asking this question here I don't think I would advise you to dive into the deep end and legalize the unit as an ADU.

no permits. and yeah, trying to retroactively legalize the addition as an ADU seems risky. they could deny and then also require the additional unit to be removed or converted back, right?

 Check out SB13 and search for "five".  Basically it should prevent them from requiring you to tear it down unless it presents some health/safety issue.  Note health and safety can include setbacks because the setbacks are needed for ingress/egress.  Assuming, no safety issue, you could get 5 years to get the unit legal.  Senator Wienkowski included this provision for safe units such as what you describe.  He wanted to prevent the removal of safe unpermitted housing units as the goal of SB13 is to provide more housing.

Note the resulting property will not be a duplex. It will either be an ADU or a JADU.

Note my continued use of safe.  If it is not safe, it should not be used as a rental.  SB13 will not apply is there are issues related to health and safety.

You may also want to look into SB9. It does not have anything related to unpermitted units, but does present a path to a duplex (versus an ADU).

Good luck

  • Dan H.
  • Loading replies...