Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

4
Posts
1
Votes
Jamie Wheeler
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Columbia MO (columbia, mo)
1
Votes |
4
Posts

Insurance coverage replacement vs. actual

Jamie Wheeler
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Columbia MO (columbia, mo)
Posted

Hello all,

I'm a new member and this is my first post. So I have a property 2BR/1BA I paid cash for. It's a fixer upper for sure. I purchased it for $40k and plan to put about $5k - $10k into it for a ARV of $75-$85k. So my question is on insurance. My mom has about 9 rentals and she goes cheap on insurance. Most of her houses are comparable to a little lesser quality than what I'm hoping to get mine up to. She only insures for the coat she has into the property. I've got a quote from her insurance guy saying he could cover it for $50k max as is and maybe a little more when I fix it up. He quoted me $255/year for $40k coverage so I would assume about $300/year for $50k. I've got another quote through my auto insurance and they do quotes for replacement cost. They are quoting me $1,050/year for $186k coverage. I think what I could get/do a nice replacement would be closer to $125k- $150k max with hiring out contractors to do everything. They do not agree and say they can't bring it down any further. I would really like coverage closer to $100k - $125k because that's what I think I could get it done for.

Please let me know your thoughts/experience on if I should go cheap to save more money each month and only have a chunk of money to rebuild with if it were to burn down, go expensive so that if anything were to happen, I would have a much nicer house rebuilt, or keep shopping around for something closer to what I want on coverage?

The house is in a good neighborhood and it’s the worst house on the block. So rebuilding a much nicer house would be what I’d plan to do regardless of policy.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

18,711
Posts
16,188
Votes
Chris Seveney
  • Investor
  • Virginia
16,188
Votes |
18,711
Posts
Chris Seveney
  • Investor
  • Virginia
ModeratorReplied

@Jamie Wheeler

If you only insure it for what you have into it and not replacement value just be aware if their is a complete loss you won’t what you insured it for.

Example:

If you insure it for $50k and replacement value is $100k. You are under insuring it for 50%.

If there is a complete loss because you underinsured it by 50%, you would get $25k from the insurance company not $50k. (Plus you would have to minus your deductible)

Lookup coinsurance clause

  • Chris Seveney
business profile image
7e investments
5.0 stars
16 Reviews

Loading replies...