Minneapolis, MN · Member since 2018 · 7 posts · 5 votes
Has anyone debated obtaining a 'limited brokers license' over a traditional real estate license? I'm trying to determine which makes most sense for self-investment property. To my understanding it provides a more direct relationship with your broker without needing to rely on an agent to see property.
Investor · Minneapolis, MN · Member since 2015 · 252 posts · 263 votes
7y
@Jay Hinrichs Limited broker license in MN allows you to do anything RE Broker can do, but with limited license one can't represent clients. You can only by / sell for your self or partnerships / companies you have 50% interest. It also has no educational requirements - one does not need to pass tests or have continuous education. That's what I got. @Jane Lee, If this is a route you will choose call Minneapolis realtor association first, state guide is not entirely correct. Good luck
Real Estate Agent · Saint Paul, MN · Member since 2015 · 225 posts · 214 votes
7y
@Jane Lee My understanding is that a limited brokers license is only an option for a current RE broker. Without being a broker yourself, the only option is a salesperson (agent). There are many low-fee brokerages out there that could hold your salesperson license and you would achieve the same result. Determine how many deals you are looking to do each year and evaluate that against the yearly cost of holding your RE license.
Investor · Minneapolis, MN · Member since 2015 · 252 posts · 263 votes
7y
@Jay Hinrichs Limited broker license in MN allows you to do anything RE Broker can do, but with limited license one can't represent clients. You can only by / sell for your self or partnerships / companies you have 50% interest. It also has no educational requirements - one does not need to pass tests or have continuous education. That's what I got. @Jane Lee, If this is a route you will choose call Minneapolis realtor association first, state guide is not entirely correct. Good luck
@Jay Hinrichs Limited broker license in MN allows you to do anything RE Broker can do, but with limited license one can't represent clients. You can only by / sell for your self or partnerships / companies you have 50% interest. It also has no educational requirements - one does not need to pass tests or have continuous education. That's what I got. @Jane Lee, If this is a route you will choose call Minneapolis realtor association first or PM me, state guide is not entirely correct. Good luck
Wow can you also be a member of MLS this would be nirvana for flippers and investors..
Real Estate Agent · Austin, TX · Member since 2015 · 5k+ posts · 3k+ votes
7y
@Jay Hinrichs if you have a pulse MN will give you a license. I don't believe you can list properties of your own as a limited broker but I may be wrong. MN Dept of Commerce of MN association of realtors probably has good info on this.