Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

107
Posts
15
Votes
Scott Nipp
  • Investor
  • Fort Worth, TX
15
Votes |
107
Posts

Sub2 questions...

Scott Nipp
  • Investor
  • Fort Worth, TX
Posted

I'm about half way thru listening to podcast 70 on Sub2 financing deals and find it really fascinating. I have a distressed home owner that I was trying to work with a few weeks ago but we couldn't get close on the numbers for a flip or rental. I'm now thinking that a Sub2 deal might be a winning strategy for her situation. However, I have a couple of questions...

1.  Anticipating her question:  Since the existing mortgage stays in place in her name, what happens in a couple of years if her situation improves and she wants to purchase another house?  Would she have a problem obtaining conventional financing for a second home that would be her primary residence?

2. Assuming that I were to close the Sub2 deal and then owner finance to a new occupant, who is responsible for the insurance on the property?

3.  If there is significant equity in the deal I understand that I could structure the owner financing to require a significant down payment to "cash out" some of that equity.  Is it also a viable strategy to simply recoup that equity on the back end of the loan after the existing financing is paid off?  Or is this just simply a bad idea?

I'm sure that I have more questions but I'll start there.  Thanks in advance for any feedback.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

22,059
Posts
14,128
Votes
Jon Holdman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
14,128
Votes |
22,059
Posts
Jon Holdman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
ModeratorReplied

@Scott Nipp  you might want to read through the thread about that podcast. There were some pretty serious concerns voiced about that strategy.

One is that if you wrap the existing mortgage and sell with owner financing, you better make dang sure that the balance you owe on the original mortgage is always below what your end buyer owes.  That podcast talks about selling with 15 year notes.  If you wrap a note with, say, 20 years left to pay with a 15 year note, the end buyer will pay off the loan five years before you do.  That means you will need to come out of pocket to pay that off when the end buyer does or else you won't be able to deliver the clear title you've said you would.

You need to be VERY, VERY, VERY clear with the end buyer that there is a very real chance that they will have to refinance quickly in order to keep the house.   Just being current on their payments IS NOT adequate to ensure they will be able to keep the house.  If they cannot refinance on a moment's notice, they may lose the house even though they have complied with everything they agreed to.  Guess who's getting sued if that happens?

Property taxes, insurance and maintenance are the responsibility of the owner.  That's the end buyer.  Neither you nor the original owner can deduct the property taxes on your tax return, even if these are, in fact, being paid by the underlying lender.  These go to the end buyer.

On your tax return (you need an accountant, by the way) you would show income from the payments you receive and deductions for the interest you pay.   

Loading replies...