Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

196
Posts
118
Votes
Jason Krick
  • Investor
  • Reading, PA
118
Votes |
196
Posts

Negotiations on REO--offer is on "Hold Status"

Jason Krick
  • Investor
  • Reading, PA
Posted

Hi everyone,

I've been negotiating with a bank on an REO. I came in low and I'm holding pretty firm on my offer. I gave them my best offer with $500 deposit, and they countered higher with a $2500 deposit. I came back with the same offer, but upped the deposit to $2500. That was the middle of last week. Just now my agent gets an email from the listing agent. They didn't counter or accept. This is what I was told:

"No counter. Offer is in a hold status, he said that means they are waiting for the investors to get back to the bank holding the home. Sounds better then no."

So, I tried to google what an offer on hold status usually means.  The only thing that came up was discussions about when a property is put on hold while multiple offers are considered.  That's not the case here.

So, is the reasoning given to my agent a plausible one?  I am probably reading into it too much, but I have a feeling that they may be on the verge of accepting, grudgingly, to be rid of the property, which they have had a long, long time.

The other question I have is about "the investors getting back to the bank holding home".  From my research, Goldman Sachs foreclosed and currently own the property.  Could they be acting on behalf of a different person/entity that held the note?

Any clarity on these questions would be appreciated.  I'm pretty sure I have a good deal here, but I only have capital to purchase one property at the moment, and I don't want to be strung along indefinitely either.

Loading replies...