@John Thedford
I think that legal aspects not withstanding, to be ethical someone attempting to wholesale a deal would have to disclose by way of contingencies that his deal is dependent on flipping the property to the ultimate buyer (assuming that he won’t close without that), and not suggest otherwise by merely relying on other (weasel) contingencies.
The wholesalers that intend to fulfill the contract and close the purchase whether or not they are able to flip the deal ( assuming any real contingencies are met), are real wholesalers and not disguised middle men.
I’m convinced that the vast majority of new people drawn to “wholesaling” (1) have little or no investment capital (2) have no ability to close a purchase i.e. need to flip the contract in order to close, and (3) have no INTENT to close, only to flip the contract.
Unless
Hence, they throw around terms like “equitable interest”, “principal” and “selling the contract not the property”, in order to (hopefully) skirt the legalities of their activities.
In all states, representing a seller or buyer in a real estate transaction, for compensation, is illegal unless one is licensed. However, different states interpret the various activities we define as “wholesaling” differently. Some have a very broad definition of representation, some more narrow. Further complicating things, some real estate commissions actively pursue any and all violators, some are much more passive.
The worst, from an ethical perspective, are those that try to appear as if they are the end buyer, are ready to close as long as the standard contingencies are met, but in actuality have no intent to close, just want to flip the contract, or use a double escrow closing, and in fact won’t close unless they do find a real buyer. These type of misleading offers have caused numerous sellers who believe that they are dealing with a real buyer to lose precious time in selling their house, and hence lose money and if the sale is distresses may ultimately cause the seller to lose the equity in his house that might have been saved if he was able to market the house to a real buyer.
Now, if the buyer were to disclose his real intentions, and with full disclosure the seller were to agree, I would believe that the wholesaler easing acting ethical. Whether he was acting legality is a more specifically state or local issue.