Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

338
Posts
444
Votes
Robert C.
  • Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
444
Votes |
338
Posts

Facebook Shifting Many Employees to Permanent Remote Work

Robert C.
  • Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
Posted

Well, this could definitely be a market mover around my neck of the woods and across the country. Facebook will permanently shift up to half of its employees to remote work.


Will people choose to live in the Bay Area if they don't need to be near work? I've got to give this some thought!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

437
Posts
675
Votes
Replied

@Robert C.

So far FB, Twitter, Square are the big employers who have announced a permanent WFH policy. FB has put more detail on this.

First, they are stating 50% of staff over the next 5 years will be remote. They are also saying they will hire aggressively and grow headcount. So what if they double their headcount in 5 years and allow only 50% of them to work remotely. That means the number of FB employees who work locally will state flat to today’s figure.

Second, it’s not an automatic perk. Only those employees who are “eligible” can avail the remote option. So many employees may not make the cut.

Third, those who opt in, will be paid adjusted salaries based on their new city of location vs take their SF salaries in those locations.

My own take is that the remote option looks great on paper but it’s not for everyone. I mean what if you can work remotely for FB but your spouse’s employee does not support WFH. What if you have kids who are in middle or high schools. What if you are a senior exec.

All that means you stay local vs moving to the forests of Wyoming, but on the plus side you get to avoid local Bay Area commute and live a bit further out maybe.

Also remote working is not uncommon in the tech business. People work remotely often, sometimes 2 days a week or more. Many times these folks tend to get left behind in careers vs others who show more time at the office and network. So again for the ambitious, remote working may not appeal.

In the end large Bay Area employees like HP, Apple, SalesForce, Tesla, NetApp, Intel, nVidia, Google, NetFlix, Intuit, AirBnB, Uber, PayPal, eBay, VISA, Oracle and many others are only telling employees to work remotely until the next few months vs permanently.

So yes while a few companies like FB and Twitter are pushing the envelope, most others are not.

What this means is the residential market should largely remain ok and un impacted. There are concerns on commercial RE and rightly so.

Loading replies...