Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

377
Posts
56
Votes
Tony Nguyen
  • Investor
  • Tampa, FL
56
Votes |
377
Posts

Office Building Analysis

Tony Nguyen
  • Investor
  • Tampa, FL
Posted

An investor has a building that I'm trying to evaluate, but can't determine which method to go by. Here are the numbers;

Actual Gross Inc $69,600.00
Actual Expenses $(16,224.00)
Vacancy (10%) $(6,960.00)
NOI $46,416.00
Value @ 8% Cap $580,200.00

The way she got this income is because she leased out each individual office suite to individual tenants. This office building is set up like a regular, 2 story house with 4 bedrooms and 2 baths so everyone is sharing common areas.

The part where I am unsure of is if you take this same property a mile away (multiple comps actually), it's leased to just 1 tenant and @ only about an NOI of $27,000 per year, which at an 8% cap will put this property at about $337,500.

I personally would only evaluate it at the 337k number just because I'm conservative, but I just wanted to see what some other investors think. I would only give it a value of that because if all 4 tenants left, the normal "market" would only allow the lower number. Again, just a thought and looking for others opinions - thanks!!

Loading replies...