Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 3 hours ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

39
Posts
30
Votes
David Litt#1 Foreclosures Contributor
30
Votes |
39
Posts

Would You Ever Take Over Someone Else’s Problem?

David Litt#1 Foreclosures Contributor
Posted

I recently came across a property where the seller wasn’t really selling the house… they were selling the problem attached to it.

  • The roof leaked.

  • Back taxes were owed.

  • Tenants were behind on rent.

On paper, it looked like a nightmare. But the numbers also showed that if someone was willing to step in, untangle the mess, and put in the work, there was significant upside.

It made me think: in real estate, we don’t just buy properties — we often buy challenges. Some investors thrive on that, others avoid it at all costs.

So here’s my question for the community:
👉 Would you take on a property with multiple problems if the long-term upside was worth it?
👉 Or do you stick to “clean” deals only?

Loading replies...