Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2,350
Posts
2,391
Votes
Brian Garlington
  • Realtor
  • Oakland, CA and a Real Estate Investor with Multi-Family Units and a Self Storage Facility
2,391
Votes |
2,350
Posts

What's easier to Rent out for cashflow? 4Br 3Br or 2Br

Brian Garlington
  • Realtor
  • Oakland, CA and a Real Estate Investor with Multi-Family Units and a Self Storage Facility
Posted

What's easier to find renters for? a 4br or 3 Br or 2Br? 

Some people say 3 Bd/2Ba is the ideal combination. 

Others say you get more cashflow with a 4 bd/2,5 but you run the risk of higher vacancy because most of the time a 4 bd is when people are looking to buy instead of rent. 

Still others say if you can buy a two bedroom for a lower price that has a "bonus room" or "office" that you can convert into a bedroom by adding a closet then that's even better because of forced appreciation.....then rent that out as a 3 bedroom 2 bath.  

What's been your experience?

By the way i live in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Most Popular Reply

Account Closed
  • San Jose, CA
3,247
Votes |
4,456
Posts
Account Closed
  • San Jose, CA
Replied
Originally posted by @Brian Garlington:

What's easier to find renters for? a 4br or 3 Br or 2Br? 

Some people say 3 Bd/2Ba is the ideal combination. 

Others say you get more cashflow with a 4 bd/2,5 but you run the risk of higher vacancy because most of the time a 4 bd is when people are looking to buy instead of rent. 

Still others say if you can buy a two bedroom for a lower price that has a "bonus room" or "office" that you can convert into a bedroom by adding a closet then that's even better because of forced appreciation.....then rent that out as a 3 bedroom 2 bath.  

What's been your experience?

By the way i live in the San Francisco Bay Area.

 Hi Brian, I grew up in the East Bay :-)

As a manager, I'd always rather rent out smaller units.  So, I'd vote for a 2 bedroom.  The reason is the type of tenants and the amount of damage you can expect.

A bigger house will attract large families and sometimes in the Bay Area, that means multi-generations.  That's a lot of wear and tear, and more maintenance calls to deal with, etc.  You'll also possibly have parking issues with neighbors and that kind of thing.  More pets, maybe.

And there is always a market for smaller, cheaper places.  A two bedroom will give you a couple, or a couple with a child, normally.  That will normally be less drama and less maintenance and damage.

Maybe a larger SFH will demand more rent, maybe they have kids in school and would stay for many years, especially if it's in a good school district - I don't know about that. I just know, that personally, based on my experience managing properties, that I'd prefer having smaller rentals. Less tenants = less problems. For what it's worth.

Loading replies...