Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Creative Real Estate Financing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

18
Posts
2
Votes
Stefan Ujkic
2
Votes |
18
Posts

“Subject To” deal , first investment questions

Stefan Ujkic
Posted

Hello All, I’m trying to buy a triplex for $600k. Owner has a mortgage of $300k @3.375% and will carry $100k @ 2% if I put $200k down. Owner wants ballon payment of total balance in 12yrs. Current rents total $3500 mo. and property in OK condition in SoCal. I thought the property was paid off when I was offered the seller financing. I was advise if I purchase this property to put the deed into a trust, but I’m not sure what else I need to do to protect my investment besides make the payment to the owners mortgage company directly and the $100k loan payment to the owner. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

6,274
Posts
7,272
Votes
Dan H.
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
7,272
Votes |
6,274
Posts
Dan H.
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
Replied
Quote from @Stefan Ujkic:
Quote from @Scott E.:
Quote from @Stefan Ujkic:

It’s worth $600k, story I was told is the seller needs the $200k down specifically 


That doesn't make sense.

If it was worth $600k and the seller needs the $200k for something, they would sell on the open market. It would sell for $600k, they would net $570k after commissions, and they would walk with $270k cash after they pay off their 1st mortgage.

I don't even need the address to tell you that this property is not worth $600k.

 12003 1st St, Yucaipa, CA 92399


 That property sold for $451k in February.  Has it been improved over $150k in the last 6 months because it certainly has not appreciated that much.  From the photo it looks like nothing has been done.

At $451k the deal looks much more palatable.   I suspect someone purchased it at a good value and is looking for someone to reward them substantially for their purchase, but $150k is too much. 

The property is not worth $600k. The low LTV kills return even if paying a fair value.

Good luck

  • Dan H.
  • Loading replies...