Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

5
Posts
1
Votes
James Haig Streeter
  • Investor
  • San Rafael, CA
1
Votes |
5
Posts

Legal 4-plex - now Building Control say County Records are wrong

James Haig Streeter
  • Investor
  • San Rafael, CA
Posted

Hi, I own a Victorian 4-plex in the SF Bay Area, which at some point would have been converted from a single family home.  County records, Property Tax records, and the Title report all show it as a 4-unit building, and so I bought it in good faith as a legal 4-plex.   However, the local Building Control is now telling me they think the County records are wrong and it should be a 3-plex, as there are only 3 gas/electric meters, not 4 (2 units share 1 meter), plus they can't find any records of when these 2 units where created - note the building is from 1900.

If this is correct, is the County liable for providing incorrect records used to purchase the property? If I knew this when I purchased it, I either would not have bought it or negotiated a lower price.

Clearly, if Building Control forces me to convert 2 units into 1 this has huge financial implications, with loss of property value, rental income, and construction costs.

Any advice is much appreciated.

Thanks, James

Loading replies...