Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

1,096
Posts
374
Votes
Mark Brogan
  • Investor
  • Roanoke, VA
374
Votes |
1,096
Posts

tax implications for a small business

Mark Brogan
  • Investor
  • Roanoke, VA
Posted

I currently own a small plumbing business

I am trying to figure out if I am better off having employees on my payroll or having them on a 1099?

we currently work for a big box retailer that pays us on a 1099

my plumbing business is set up in an s corporation

thanks for your help

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,561
Posts
2,286
Votes
Brandon Hall
  • CPA
  • Raleigh, NC
2,286
Votes |
1,561
Posts
Brandon Hall
  • CPA
  • Raleigh, NC
Replied

@Sylvia B. You most certainly can "choose what you want" as long as you model your business appropriately. For instance, instead of hiring a full-time employee, you hire a part-time vendor who is free to take on other clients. You build a business around that type of model and now you only have contractors on staff rather than employees.

@Mark Brogan from a dollar perspective, it's much more costly to hire an employee. You have payroll, insurance, additional overhead, benefits, new overtime rules, etc. A contractor incurs all of those costs instead. You just pay their fee and be done with it.

As an aside from an efficiency perspective, it could be argued that a full-time employee will bring more efficiency to the table. I've not yet been in business long enough to test this, but I feel that contractors could bring much more efficiency to the table as they are compensated in a manner that inspires innovation.

I'm a big believer in results only compensation. I still haven't figured out how you can pay employees based on results unless they are paid on commission.

Loading replies...