Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

44
Posts
6
Votes
Rahul Sunkavalli
  • Investor
  • Franklin Park, NJ
6
Votes |
44
Posts

Roth 401K and Roth IRA

Rahul Sunkavalli
  • Investor
  • Franklin Park, NJ
Posted
Working full time while attempting to invest. If my goals are to leverage RE for financial freedom, should I still max out retirement accounts? 1. Roth 401k vs 401k? 2. Open a Roth IRA as well? Trying to figure out of I should max those options out along with saving to invest in real estate. Thoughts and advice is kuch appreciated. Thanks, Rahul

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,879
Posts
2,540
Votes
Brian Eastman
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
2,540
Votes |
2,879
Posts
Brian Eastman
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
Replied

@Harrison Sharp

Actually, @Michael Plaks knows exactly what he is talking about, and did couch his original statement as a generality dependent on specific details, and not a universal principal.

If you are in the 35% tax bracket today and make a $10,000 Roth contribution, it costs you $3,500 in taxes. If you grow the Roth IRA to $100,000 you made $90,000 of tax free money. Last I checked, 25% of $100,000 is $25,000, which is what you would pay distributing from a tax-deferred IRA. Yes, the rate is higher today in your example, but the net tax amount paid in the Roth scenario is considerably less than in the tax-deferred scenario.

(This is an oversimplified example, BTW, as a true comparison would not be with just one lump sum starting amount, and would need to account for investing the taxes not paid in the tax-deferred scenario to get a true apples-to-apples look.  For someone with a significant amount of time the Roth side of the equation will win big, however, which is the necessary takeaway here.)

Separately, most folks on BP are not aiming to be in a lower tax bracket when they retire.  The retirement industry standard line is exactly what you have said, but accepting the logic that your retirement years will be in a lower tax bracket means you are planning to fail.  If you have succeeded, then you will continue to be in a high tax bracket well beyond the point at which you stop working a job.

Loading replies...

1 2