How 0% capital gain rate actually works

How 0% capital gain rate actually works

Michael PlaksPro Member
Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent · Houston, TX · Member since 2014 · 5k+ posts · 6k+ votes

"For the first $40,000 of your income, the capital gain tax rate is 0%! You pay nothing!"

Fantastic, but what does it actually mean?

  • If I have no job and sell a property for $100,000 - does it mean I pay nothing for the first $40,000 and then 15% on the remaining $60,000?
  • If I have a $50k job and have a $25,000 capital gain from selling stocks - is it tax-free because $25,000 is less than $40,000?

The answers are no and no, so let me try to clarify how this actually works.

IMPORTANT: only long-term gains have these good rates. Short-term (1 yr or less) gains are taxed much higher.

1. The 0% capital gain bracket by itself

We will start with a rare situation of having absolutely no other income but long-term capital gains. 

The first $40k of your taxable capital gain is in this magical 0% tax bracket. Double it to $80k if you're a married couple. By the way, my numbers are rounded; the exact numbers are different and increase slightly every year.

The word taxable is important, because you first subtract your standard deduction of approximately $12k for single folks and $24k for the couples. If you itemized your deductions, then you subtract your itemized deductions instead. You might also have other subtractions known as adjustments, for example student loan interest. Whatever is left is called taxable income.

This means that a single guy with no job or other income can generate $52k in capital gains and pay $0 in taxes. 

For comparison, if he had a $52k job, he would pay $4.5k in income taxes plus another $4k in FICA taxes.

2. Capital gains combined with other income

Now let's give this guy a $52k job and give him capital gain taxes in addition to his job. Does he still get $40k of tax-free capital gains? No, he does not. His taxable income was already at the $40k limit just from his job, so every penny of his capital gain is taxable at 15%.

What if his job income was only $42k? 

  • We first subtract $12k standard deduction and arrive at $30k
  • This $30k is his taxable income before his capital gains are added
  • He now has room for $10k of tax-free capital gains before reaching the $40k ceiling
  • If he receives a $100k capital gain, the first $10k is tax-free, and the remaining $90k is taxed at 15%

See how this works? Double all these numbers for married couples filing jointly.

3. What is a capital gain on selling real property?

This is a very complex topic, but I want to show one simplified example here:

  • bought a house for $200k
  • held it as a rental for a few years and deducted $30k worth of depreciation
  • sold the house for $260k
  • your capital gain is $90k, of which $60k is from appreciation of the property, and $30k is depreciation recapture

If this house was sold by a retired couple who had no other taxable income for the year, they would still pay zero taxes on the sale! This is because a married couple has a $52k x 2 = $104k (or, if this makes more sense, $80k + $24k = $104k) threshold, and depreciation recapture is a form of capital gain, so it gets rolled into this free zone, too. Sweet.

44Reply
230 views

Most Popular Reply

Daniel DietzPro Member
Rental Property Investor · Reedsburg, WI · Member since 2011 · 1k+ posts · 857 votes
5y

Excellent explanation @Michael Plaks, thank you very much. I think this will help a TON of people wrap their heads around the topic.

It would be nice if the moderators would put it as a 'sticky tread' in the tax forum :-)

Thanks, Dan Dietz


See this reply in the discussion

46 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Michael PlaksPro Member
    OP
    Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent · Houston, TX · Member since 2014 · 5k+ posts · 6k+ votes
    5y
    Originally posted by @Account Closed:

    I could. Time is another issue. You'd be shocked ;)

  • Daniel DietzPro Member
    Rental Property Investor · Reedsburg, WI · Member since 2011 · 1k+ posts · 857 votes
    5y

    Excellent explanation @Michael Plaks, thank you very much. I think this will help a TON of people wrap their heads around the topic.

    It would be nice if the moderators would put it as a 'sticky tread' in the tax forum :-)

    Thanks, Dan Dietz


  • Real Estate Broker · Portland, OR · Member since 2019 · 4k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    5y

    Doesn't sound as good as the $500K lifetime exemption if I move in the house and live there a couple of years?

    Interesting though.  And refreshing since don't see enough posts by people (includes me) know what they're talking about on non- real estate stuff here.

  • Michael PlaksPro Member
    OP
    Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent · Houston, TX · Member since 2014 · 5k+ posts · 6k+ votes
    5y
    Originally posted by @Steve Morris:

    Doesn't sound as good as the $500K lifetime exemption if I move in the house and live there a couple of years?

    This is not how the $500k really works, in more than one way, but it's another topic altogether. 

  • MBA, CFP®, EA · Columbus, OH · Member since 2018 · 175 posts · 207 votes
    5y

    @Michael Plaks

    You’re the man

  • Accountant · Vancouver, WA · Member since 2019 · 100 posts · 71 votes
    5y

    Good stuff as always! 

  • Attorney · Littleton, CO · Member since 2015 · 28 posts · 13 votes
    5y

    Great explanation, Mike. I was just having this conversation with a client yesterday and didn't explain it half so well.

  • Real Estate Agent · Houston, TX · Member since 2020 · 7 posts · 4 votes
    5y

    @Michael Plaks

    That was awesome, could you do a similar breakdown for the $500k exemption for a potential retiring couple living in the rental property?? I need to break this down for my father in law who is currently trying to decide if a 1031 exchange is the best fit for him long term!

  • Michael PlaksPro Member
    OP
    Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent · Houston, TX · Member since 2014 · 5k+ posts · 6k+ votes
    5y
    Originally posted by @Julie Dib:


    That was awesome, could you do a similar breakdown for the $500k exemption for a potential retiring couple living in the rental property?? I need to break this down for my father in law who is currently trying to decide if a 1031 exchange is the best fit for him long term!

    Thanks, Julie. $500k exemption applies to a homestead, i.e. a property you live in and own. Not sure what you mean by mentioning "living in the rental property", 1031 exchange and $500k exemption all in the same paragraph.

  • Real Estate Agent · Houston, TX · Member since 2020 · 7 posts · 4 votes
    5y

    @Michael Plaks

    Sorry, let me see if I can articulate my question properly haha. So my father in law just sold a rental in Cali he’ll have about $300k in capital gains, if he were to 1031 exchange that money into a new rental property and plan to eventually live in it, how long does he have to rent it for before he lives in it? And how long does he have to live in it in order to sell it as a homestead and not pay capital gains?

    Hope that made sense :) thanks

  • Michael PlaksPro Member
    OP
    Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent · Houston, TX · Member since 2014 · 5k+ posts · 6k+ votes
    5y
    Originally posted by @Julie Dib:

     So my father in law just sold a rental in Cali he’ll have about $300k in capital gains, if he were to 1031 exchange that money into a new rental property...

    If your father-in-law already sold the house, it is too late for a 1031, sorry. 1031 had to be started before he sold the house. The only tax deferral option he has now is to roll the gains into a Qualified Opportunity Zone fund. To discuss that, start another thread please, as it has nothing to do with the topic of this one.

  • Real Estate Agent · Houston, TX · Member since 2020 · 7 posts · 4 votes
    5y

    @Michael Plaks

    Sorry, he just accepted an offer- not sold yet, needs to ID a property now...

  • Member since 2019 · 332 posts · 171 votes
    5y

    @Michael Plaks great post! I guess the easiest way to not pay any taxes is to earn very little 😉

    In your 3rd example, if the rental property was sold by a single person with no job/income, they would have to pay taxes on $38k, with 15% on 8k and 25% on 30k - is that right?

    If yes, then I guess Uncle Sam wants to make sure (via depreciation recapture) that people opt for 1031, which means they never see their gains and continue to pump money into real estate (and take associated risks). If they want to actually see the gains then they should earn very little to begin with or pay more in taxes than what they saved via depreciation. Uncle Sam seems to be the winner every time.

  • Investor · Las Vegas, NV · Member since 2013 · 8k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    5y

    @Julie Dib

    Julie, if it’s a rental first there is no amount of time to be tax free. 

    If you live in it first (not your 1031 exchange example) for 2 of the last 5 years you get the $500k exemption. 

    If it’s a rental first, then you get the percent of time it was a personal residence to use that $500k. (It’s a rental for 4 years and then you live there for 6 years, 60% of the gain can be used against the $500k.) you’ll notice it has diminishing returns. 4 year rental live there 2 years 33% (+33%), 4 years 4 years only 50% (+17%), 4 years 6 years 60% (+10%) 4 years 8 years 66% (+6%). 

    Our elders took too big a use of the 2 of 5 year rule and moved from rental to rental for 2 years at a time to save all the taxes and the government was not pleased. :-)

  • Michael PlaksPro Member
    OP
    Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent · Houston, TX · Member since 2014 · 5k+ posts · 6k+ votes
    5y
    Originally posted by @Bill B.:

    Guys, please do not discuss Julie's 1031 question on this thread. It is off-topic and is a disservice to people who visit this thread for its original topic of the 0% capital gain rate. I created a new thread, answered your question there, and tagged both of you. Please go there to continue this conversation. Thank you.

  • Michael PlaksPro Member
    OP
    Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent · Houston, TX · Member since 2014 · 5k+ posts · 6k+ votes
    5y
    Originally posted by @Tushar P.:

    @Michael Plaks great post! I guess the easiest way to not pay any taxes is to earn very little 😉

    In your 3rd example, if the rental property was sold by a single person with no job/income, they would have to pay taxes on $38k, with 15% on 8k and 25% on 30k - is that right?

    If yes, then I guess Uncle Sam wants to make sure (via depreciation recapture) that people opt for 1031, which means they never see their gains and continue to pump money into real estate (and take associated risks). If they want to actually see the gains then they should earn very little to begin with or pay more in taxes than what they saved via depreciation. Uncle Sam seems to be the winner every time.

    If your primary goal is to not pay taxes - then yes, making no money will do that. Also, the easiest way to avoid gaining weight is to avoid food. :)   

    Your formula is not how it works, and I cannot give you a better formula, because it really is complicated when it comes to depreciation recapture. This is one of the many reasons why we have tax software. Without depreciation recapture, it would have been 15% of the $38k. With depreciation recapture, it's more than that, but not as much as you calculated.

    In fact, you made me confess that I lied in my 3rd example. There actually will be a little bit of tax to pay (less than $1k) in my 3rd example, but don't ask me to explain why.

    Depreciation is not a freebie, it is a loan: you save initially, but you have to return your savings when you sell, unless you exchange. However, you're not correct assuming that depreciation recapture makes you pay more than what you saved by claiming depreciation. It can happen, but usually it's the other way around, and you come out ahead.

  • Investor · Las Vegas, NV · Member since 2013 · 8k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    5y

    Thanks Michael but if you read my post it has 1031 in one sentence. And it says “NOT your 1031 example”.

    I was answering her question about capital gains tax on a rental turned into a primary to avoid capital gains tax that everyone ignored. 

    I might have ignored it if it wasn’t the OP but it was her question. 

    “

    @Michael Plaks

    Sorry, let me see if I can articulate my question properly haha. So my father in law just sold a rental in Cali he’ll have about $300k in capital gains, if he were to 1031 exchange that money into a new rental property and plan to eventually live in it, how long does he have to rent it for before he lives in it? And how long does he have to live in it in order to sell it as a homestead and not pay capital gains?

    Hope that made sense :) thanks”

  • Rental Property Investor · Los Angeles · Member since 2018 · 844 posts · 1k+ votes
    5y
    Originally posted by @Michael Plaks:
    Originally posted by @Tushar P.:

    @Michael Plaks great post! I guess the easiest way to not pay any taxes is to earn very little 😉

    In your 3rd example, if the rental property was sold by a single person with no job/income, they would have to pay taxes on $38k, with 15% on 8k and 25% on 30k - is that right?

    If yes, then I guess Uncle Sam wants to make sure (via depreciation recapture) that people opt for 1031, which means they never see their gains and continue to pump money into real estate (and take associated risks). If they want to actually see the gains then they should earn very little to begin with or pay more in taxes than what they saved via depreciation. Uncle Sam seems to be the winner every time.

    If your primary goal is to not pay taxes - then yes, making no money will do that. Also, the easiest way to avoid gaining weight is to avoid food. :)   

    Your formula is not how it works, and I cannot give you a better formula, because it really is complicated when it comes to depreciation recapture. This is one of the many reasons why we have tax software. Without depreciation recapture, it would have been 15% of the $38k. With depreciation recapture, it's more than that, but not as much as you calculated.

    In fact, you made me confess that I lied in my 3rd example. There actually will be a little bit of tax to pay (less than $1k) in my 3rd example, but don't ask me to explain why.

    Depreciation is not a freebie, it is a loan: you save initially, but you have to return your savings when you sell, unless you exchange. However, you're not correct assuming that depreciation recapture makes you pay more than what you saved by claiming depreciation. It can happen, but usually it's the other way around, and you come out ahead.

    Hi Michael, awesome thread!

    It wouldn't be a straight 25% on the depreciation recapture...it would be taxed using the same schedule as ordinary income and simply capped at 25%, I believe....right?. Since Tushar's adjusted example is calling for a single person with no other income, I would imagine the effective rate would be much lower than 25%. The confusing part would be, how much of the 38K is allocated to recapture and how much is allocated to LTCG.

  • Michael PlaksPro Member
    OP
    Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent · Houston, TX · Member since 2014 · 5k+ posts · 6k+ votes
    5y
    Originally posted by @Tony Kim:

    Thanks for the compliment. You're correct that it's not 25% depreciation recapture. Yes, it's the ordinary rate schedule capped at 25%. So yes, it is much less. You are also right on target asking how much of $38k is allocated to recapture. The answer is $18k, but please don't expect me to explain the mechanics. I would not dare to explain it even if you're a CPA, which you might be, based on your astute observations. Not because I think that I'm smart and everybody else is stupid, but because it's so ridiculously tedious.

    Run this example through tax software, print out the 2-page Schedule D tax calculation worksheet if your software has it, consume a minimum of 3 shots of your drink of choice, and have at it. Cruel and unusual punishment. It once took me 4 hours to get through the calculations by hand when I decided to verify the tax software calculation. It seemed to be wrong, but it was actually right. Whoever came up with the unrecaptured Sec 1250 gains rules should be condemned to hell effective yesterday. 

  • Brian BoydPro Member
    USA · Member since 2019 · 305 posts · 536 votes
    5y

    @Michael Plaks this is excellent! Thanks for sharing!

  • Member since 2019 · 7k+ posts · 4k+ votes
    5y

    Very good. I've been wondering the same and I found the best time to sell property is actually when one is retired or when you get laid off ha ha :) LOL

  • Member since 2019 · 7k+ posts · 4k+ votes
    5y

    @Michael Plaks is my tax hero.
    @Tushar P. your summary is always good, I've been waiting for so long for someone to say like what you just said. IMO Sec 121 is the biggest advantage after all.

  • Solo 401k Expert · Anaheim Hills, CA · Member since 2012 · 18k+ posts · 6k+ votes
    5y

    @Michael Plaks thanks for spelling things out! 

  • Daniel DietzPro Member
    Rental Property Investor · Reedsburg, WI · Member since 2011 · 1k+ posts · 857 votes
    5y

    @Michael Plaks, I am wondering if you could explain it in 'reverse' - meaning how does Capital Gains affect 'regular income' (such as W2) tax rate?

    Let's say a couple has 105K of W2 income and uses the standard deduction and has a 'taxable income' of 80K (rounded), so they are in the 12% bracket for Federal Taxes.

    If we now add 100K of capital gains that is taxable they are at a total of 180K of taxable income.

    So I assume from what has been explained so far the Capital Gains Rate would be 15% since their 'total taxable income' is above 80K. 

    But what happens the their tax rate on their 'regular taxable income'? Does THAT rate ALSO 'go up' since their 'total taxable income' is 180K? Are they now in the 24% bracket?

    Thanks, Dan Dietz

  • Member since 2021 · 6 posts · 1 vote
    5y

    Response question about depreciation recapture. 

    I buy a house for 500K and rent it out. I depreciate the house to zero over 27.5 years. I sell the house for 1million. Does this mean I pay tax on 500K sale profit at a 15% rate and tax on the 500K depreciation recapture at a 25% rate?

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.