Oh boy - no he doesn't have one loanlooks like he has 11 and if they are 11 then he just syndicated a deal
i woukd be $50,000 those investors lose all of their $ then be on sites wondering why they lost their money and how bad an experience it was
. I simply started racking up the complications with this deal in my mind and realized what a very foolish approach this is. Actually, it wasn't hard to see right away.
One correction in the market and whoosh . . . disaster
These 11 would be unsophisticated investors, who likely wouldn't have $5,000 they could afford to lose if things went bad.
The unsophisticated investors couldn’t possibly understand the risk
It’s likely that the property is now 100% levered or worse
What happens if the Due on Sale
is called
If any one of them next month needed their money back for an emergency, how does that get paid
These loans are presumably for the rest of the length of the underlying loan, which could be 25 years
The lead investor is in business for very little money out of his pocket with a whale of a lot of responsibility with a dozen people he doesn’t know
There are always, always, always people that misunderstand what you’ve told them and will likely get burned which in turn will burn the lead investor’s reputation
How are each of the loans secured
Who makes sure everyone gets their monthly payment
Making sure each investor gets their $50 every month is a pain in the a**
Who is going to handle proper reporting for tax purposes
What happens if there is a vacancy, no money coming in
What happens when a new roof or HVAC is required
Who’s name is the insurance
Depending on how it’s structured, there are other issues
It just seems like something from a Michael Mastro diary.
“Michael Mastro started his career in the real estate business in 1967, developing real estate projects worth at least $2 billion over 40 years, including commercial buildings and houses.
He was involved in hard money loans, mostly to desperate real estate developers, with second or third deeds of trust on projects as collateral.[11]
His company, Michael R. Mastro Properties, was well known in and around Seattle, the location of most of its projects and properties. “
He eventually went bankrupt and a lot of people got hurt.
I watched the same person and at the end its to sell you his services for 10 grand.
. Here is what the securities lawyer I asked had to say: "This may be a secured transaction requiring SEC compliance if these contributions are loans, making you the bank."
@Jay Hinrichs: I believe you lend to investors, is this a common practice in real estate or is it regulated?
It's possible, because those investors sound like they're apart of some investment group comprised of individual accredited investors. But it's my understanding, those group can be pretty costly to join. But I believe a simplier deal structure, that's lighter on the pocket book; maybe a document fee or two, but ususally they can be rolled into the loan depending on your relationship with the lender...and this would be a 1. single source lender aka, a transactional lender to cover the down payment, with the seller carrying back roughly 30 to 40%, and you can qualify for a private money or dscr lender at roughly 65 to 70% ltv. This structure assures that the seller gets all of their money at closing. 2. Another simple structure, and offers the fastest closing process and frankly, imo is the best structure, is a seller finance of 70 to 80% in the first position, if you can find an aggressive hard money lender with abbreviated underwriting, relies primarily on cap rates to assess value vs an appraisal or bpo and is asset based oriented or in essence, a dscr lender, with very little weight on credit. They would provide your downpayment money. End of story. The only slight problem with this solution is that they're rare birds. Any smart accedited investors out there?....lol