Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2,713
Posts
2,244
Votes
Patti Robertson
  • Property Manager
  • Virginia Beach, VA
2,244
Votes |
2,713
Posts

WOW - You won't believe what this SEC 8 Housing Authority Director Told Me!

Patti Robertson
  • Property Manager
  • Virginia Beach, VA
Posted

I have been housing SEC 8 tenants for 15 years, and have about 120 voucher holding tenants in my property management brokerage. Last week the director of the Norfolk, VA HA told me that if a voucher holder tenant tells them that they vacated a property sometime in the past, the Housing Authority will go claw back rents paid, with zero proof from the tenant. This seems OUTRAGEOUS to me. Has anyone ever seen this happen? The HAP states that rent stops when the tenant vacates, but it also states that the tenant must give notice to both the landlord and the HA. If no notice is given, how can rent be retroactively clawed back? I would love to hear other people's experiences.

  • Patti Robertson
  • 7574722547

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,713
Posts
2,244
Votes
Patti Robertson
  • Property Manager
  • Virginia Beach, VA
2,244
Votes |
2,713
Posts
Patti Robertson
  • Property Manager
  • Virginia Beach, VA
Replied

@Richard F. - That's a great point that makes this scenario even a larger potential risk.  I don't think it solves the issue though. If the funds aren't in the account they would just coordinate it with the next deposit.  It would slow down the claw, but wouldn't stop it.

  • Patti Robertson
  • 7574722547

Loading replies...