Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

8
Posts
1
Votes
Michael K.
  • Manassas, VA
1
Votes |
8
Posts

Bi-Weekly Rent Payments

Michael K.
  • Manassas, VA
Posted

Hey everybody,

         I just had a crazy thought and I was wondering if anyone has tried it.  That is, since most people get paid on a bi-weekly basis, has anyone ever tried offering rent payments being due on the same basis to a tenant for convenience?  My thoughts are that it would help them "level load" their bills over the month rather than making a big rent payment at the beginning of the month.  I know that it probably shouldn't matter if you follow the >3x rent income rule when screening tenants.  What's in it for the landlord you might ask?  Well, I was thinking that the option would cost them an additional 5% or so for the convenience and to cover extra processing and tracking effort required by the property manager.  For example, Option 1: $500/month paid on 1st or Option 2: $260 paid on 1st and 15th.  That option would add up to an extra half-months rent if they went for it!  Thoughts?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17,541
Posts
30,327
Votes
Russell Brazil
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Washington, D.C.
30,327
Votes |
17,541
Posts
Russell Brazil
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Washington, D.C.
ModeratorReplied

As a  landlord I would be all for this as then I would receive 13 months of rent in 1 year instead of 12 months. However I think my tenants would generally be against paying an extra month of rent per year.

business profile image
District Invest Group
5.0 stars
44 Reviews

Loading replies...