Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

239
Posts
176
Votes
Todd Fithian
  • Investor
  • Riverside, CA
176
Votes |
239
Posts

5% Owner occupied?

Todd Fithian
  • Investor
  • Riverside, CA
Posted

Hey BP,

Have any of you used this strategy? I guess its not much of a "Strategy", but more of another way to get into a mortgage. Im starting to look into my second rental property and would be moving out of my current duplex into my next property, and have heard that a 5% down owner occupied loan would fit well with my needs. I guess my real question is, why go with this strategy over, lets say, an FHA at 3.5% again? Lower payment?...barely id guess. I definitely know the best source of info on this would be to (obviously) speak much more with the lender themselves, but im Just curious of your input. Thanks

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

823
Posts
762
Votes
Zack Karp
  • Lender
  • Schaumburg, IL
762
Votes |
823
Posts
Zack Karp
  • Lender
  • Schaumburg, IL
Replied

Hey gang, there's a little bit of bad info on this post, so let me clarify.  Either some lenders giving bad info to some of you, or the game telephone where the info gets distorted as it's passed down.

FHA is only for a primary residence (except also streamline refinances are allowed for investment property). You can put as little as 3.5% down no matter if it's 1-4 units. You can only have 1 FHA loan at a time (except for extenuating circumstances like if you are relocating for work 100 miles away).

Conventional you can put as little as 3% down for a 1-unit primary residence purchase, 15% down for 2-unit, and 25% down for 3-4 units.  For an investment property, 15% down for a 1-unit, and 25% down for 2-4 units.

Conventional is better than FHA if you have a 680+ credit score, as the blended rate and PMI cost is lower. But if your credit score is under 680, then usually the blended rate/PMI is actually lower with FHA. Now, FHA has an upfront cost called UFMIP which is 1.75% of the loan amount. But for many situations it's better to increase your rate and get a lender credit to pay that UFMIP, and again under a 680 credit score you will still meet or beat Conventional. I help people do this all the time, it's a strategy that many loan officers don't take the time to educate the borrower about their options and the true cost-effectiveness. It's especially critical for investors in order to get their best ROI.

And be careful of overlays. Some lenders, banks and brokers have additional rules on top of the actual guidelines. Things like number of properties, LTV's, debt-to-income, credit scores, asset reserves, and many other credit guidelines can vary.

While many people on BP are super smart and super helpful, they aren't professional lenders.  As an investor, It's best to talk to an investor-friendly lender/LO who knows their stuff.  Just be sure to do your homework.

Best of luck!

  • Zack Karp
  • 847-387-5513
  • Loading replies...