Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Tax Liens & Mortgage Notes
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 1 month ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

116
Posts
75
Votes
Mike Day
  • Investor
  • Indianapolis, IN
75
Votes |
116
Posts

Investing in performing underwater notes

Mike Day
  • Investor
  • Indianapolis, IN
Posted

I am considering investing in some notes for the first time and want to know what people think about this idea. Is it a valid strategy to invest in performing first position underwater notes (where the borrower owes more than the home is worth)? It appears that being underwater is not actually a popular reason to stop paying, and not that many people did it even during the great financial crisis. Barring some kind of new crisis, it seems like the risk is probably only a few percentage points higher than loans that do have equity, yet these notes have much higher yields. Especially if you can get a good payment history on these notes, they seem only slightly more risky. Am I missing something? Because I'm thinking of making this a niche.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

19,112
Posts
16,714
Votes
Chris Seveney
  • Investor
  • Virginia
16,714
Votes |
19,112
Posts
Chris Seveney
  • Investor
  • Virginia
ModeratorReplied
Quote from @Mike Day:

I am considering investing in some notes for the first time and want to know what people think about this idea. Is it a valid strategy to invest in performing first position underwater notes (where the borrower owes more than the home is worth)? It appears that being underwater is not actually a popular reason to stop paying, and not that many people did it even during the great financial crisis. Barring some kind of new crisis, it seems like the risk is probably only a few percentage points higher than loans that do have equity, yet these notes have much higher yields. Especially if you can get a good payment history on these notes, they seem only slightly more risky. Am I missing something? Because I'm thinking of making this a niche.

You're asking the right questions, and on paper, the math can look very appealing with underwater notes — but in practice, there’s a lot more nuance.

First, remember that you really have no idea what the property is truly worth unless you can get inside. These properties often come with added risk: delinquent taxes, lapsed insurance, unknown property condition, and possible code violations or liens. The borrowers also have less incentive to maintain the property, which can deteriorate faster than you expect.

We've done hundreds of notes, and while it’s true that being underwater alone isn’t always the trigger for default, we’ve consistently seen better overall returns — and smoother exits — on loans where the borrower has some equity or a strong incentive to stay. When they have something to lose, they tend to stay engaged.

Foreclosure timelines and legal costs also vary wildly by state, so what looks like a high yield can get wiped out quickly if you’re not factoring in delays, legal hurdles, or damage upon taking the property back.

It’s not that you can’t make money with underwater notes — you can — but if you're thinking of making it a niche, just go in with eyes wide open and build a strategy around low acquisition cost, strong servicing, and legal efficiency.



  • Chris Seveney
business profile image
7e investments
5.0 stars
1 Review

Loading replies...