Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Oklahoma City Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Jeffrey Wong
0
Votes |
2
Posts

Whey are there so many houses for sale in Edmond?

Jeffrey Wong
Posted

Hi folks, this is my first post in BP. I have been browsing the forum for a while. I'm considering buying a rental property in Edmond. My strategy is buy and hold for long term. It appears to me Edmond has a loooot of homes on the market - over 1k listings. This seems extremely high to me when compared to other markets. Is this a norm in Edmond, or is there something happening in the market driven by other forces going on right now? Appreciate your inputs!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,019
Posts
2,322
Votes
Will Fraser
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Salt Lake City & Oklahoma City
2,322
Votes |
3,019
Posts
Will Fraser
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Salt Lake City & Oklahoma City
Replied

One factor that I'd like to highlight in this convo is this:  the manner in which Edmond is developing (which is akin to Moore, Blanchard, Newcastle, Yukon, Mustang, Piedmont, Arcardia, Guthrie, etc ad infinitum) is almost always going to create the following:

- New construction homes demonstrate no appreciation during the first X years of ownership.

New construction neighborhoods have a "new car/old car" dynamic to them wherein while the builders are still slinging new homes, they'll always have the edge over someone who has already "taken the home for a spin."  But, once the builders have filled up the available lots and the new inventory has churned you'll typically see homes rise in value.  This is caused by the direct tie between scarcity and value.  When a builder is building them, they aren't scarce, therefore they aren't more valuable than they were a year ago. 

Enter the next challenging dynamic:  the way our peripheral cities are developing:  Buy Field, Develop, Build.  As long as there are more fields, there is a chance that the developers will finish one neighborhood of 75-250 homes and then immediately start developing the neighboring area.  As long as this doesn't introduce the exact same asset class it can be a neutral or a positive factor, but it is churns out 75-250 more of the same produce then you'll see longer period of "no-appreciation", otherwise known as "stagflation"

Loading replies...