Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

15
Posts
4
Votes
Sean Larsen
  • Phoenix, AZ
4
Votes |
15
Posts

Can you BRRRR anywhere there's flippers? Episode 327 discussion.

Sean Larsen
  • Phoenix, AZ
Posted

In BP episode 327, they make the point that if there are flippers in a market, then BRRRR will work. Is this appropriate thinking?

For example, let's assume you BRRRR perfectly and refi all you cash invested out of a deal. Market stats: The ARV is $200K and rents are $1,400. At 80% LTV, 5.5% interest rate, $1,600/yr taxes, and $800/yr insurance, you get a PITI of about $1,108. Assuming 8% vacancy and 8% capex, you get cash flow of $68. That's barely breaking even. Yes, you got the equity, but without cash flow would you consider this a workable deal? So does BRRRR really work anywhere flippers can succeed, or do we also need that sweet sweet cash flow?

Thanks for your feedback!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,752
Posts
3,860
Votes
Michael Noto
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Southington, CT
3,860
Votes |
5,752
Posts
Michael Noto
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Southington, CT
Replied

@Sean Larsen Typically loans on the refinance side with the BRRRR strategy will be 70-75% LTV in our experience.

  • Michael Noto

Loading replies...