HUD Regulations and Tenant Home Mod requests -- reasonable or not?

HUD Regulations and Tenant Home Mod requests -- reasonable or not?

Arvada, CO · Member since 2017 · 13 posts · 2 votes

Legal/home modification request advice; rental in NW Denver, Colorado area. Tenant claims to have multiple disabilities  that make it necessary to have home modifications (she receives SSI/SSDI). This list and demand from tenant is growing but without documentation from a licensed doctor. The latest was the demand for a new fence with an electronic lock, a new back sliding door (one is there already) with an electronic lock and front door electronic lock. Tenant insists that any modifications (paid by landlord) will be owned by tenant and will go with her if/when she leaves and that landlord will restore back to previous at landlord's expense. (My legal research states very differently--that tenant, after modifications are approved ahead by landlord, has to restore at tenant expense the unit if leaving.) 

Back story: Tenant receives 92-100% of rent subsidized by Coalition for the Homeless. A new front door was recently installed and tenant switched another lock with the lock that landlord had contractor install during the installation (without written permission according to the lease). Landlord warned and then had to send a demand letter for non-compliance (missing/late rent and change of locks). Tenant promised to change the lock back but after a meeting with the Coalition, landlord, and tenant, where documentation was determined to be needed for the new "accommodation" for front door electronic lock, the tenant sent a letter detailing all the requirements she MUST have including the electronic locks above. With this multi-page "request" letter, tenant insists on duct cleaning once a year and pest spraying twice a year (likely reasonable), sprinkler system to spray her plants, and other unrealistic expectations, along with brand new sliding back door and new fence and gate with electronic lock. This letter was composed by the tenant (no official postmark) and has no professional signature (by doctor or legal person). Eviction is the next step legally as far as my research has shown and the demand letter period is over.

0Reply
156 views

Most Popular Reply

Russell BrazilBusiness Member
Moderator
Real Estate Agent · Washington, D.C. · Member since 2012 · 17k+ posts · 30k+ votes
1y

Accommodations if needed are paid for by the tenant. When tenant leaves, they need to pay to revert the premises back to its original condition.

See this reply in the discussion

16 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Russell BrazilBusiness Member
    Moderator
    Real Estate Agent · Washington, D.C. · Member since 2012 · 17k+ posts · 30k+ votes
    1y

    Accommodations if needed are paid for by the tenant. When tenant leaves, they need to pay to revert the premises back to its original condition.

    • Property Manager · Lombard, IL · Member since 2013 · 99 posts · 82 votes
      1y
      Quote from @Russell Brazil:

      Accommodations if needed are paid for by the tenant. When tenant leaves, they need to pay to revert the premises back to its original condition.

       This doesn't always apply is the tenant is on federal assistance, which this one may be.  I would consult with an attorney knowledgeable in your state laws and federal law pertaining to this topic.

      https://dhr.illinois.gov/content/dam/soi/en/web/dhr/publicat...

  • Severna Park, MD · Member since 2013 · 7k+ posts · 7k+ votes
    1y

    I think you should wash and detail their car once a month , fill up the gas tank and pay for a nice restaurant once a month .

    Do what is necessary to get rid of this tenant 

  • David PeschioBusiness Member
    Richmond, VA · Member since 2019 · 358 posts · 181 votes
    1y

    Just stick to what Russell said and that will keep you complient and out of any legal issues.

  • MD/DC · Member since 2024 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    1y

    I would not renew the lease and would be on the lookout for the opportunity to evict if it presents. 

  • Member since 2022 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    1y

    Find a good eviction attorney, call a few and get their prices. Start eviction proceedings at the first opportunity within the law and your lease terms. Maybe your son needs a place?

  • Theresa HarrisPro Member
    Member since 2019 · 15k+ posts · 11k+ votes
    1y

    Talk to her case worker, but no way a new fence is required as part of any disability.  Where I have rentals (not CO), landlords are not required to make changes to an existing property.  A tenant can have modifications met with permission, but have to pay for them and restore the home when they leave.

  • Drew SygitBusiness Member
    Property Manager · Royal Oak, MI · Member since 2012 · 12k+ posts · 9k+ votes
    1y
  • Property Manager · Lombard, IL · Member since 2013 · 99 posts · 82 votes
    1y
    Quote from @Account Closed:

    This is actually what I am asking clarity about.  Tenant does receive subsidy (did I not post that clearly) from Coalition for the Homeless.  Not sure this is federal subsidy, though.  Tenant does receive SSI/SSDI.


     This is why I advised consulting with an attorney.  Getting legal advice from the internet would not be my choice. 

  • Property Manager · Lombard, IL · Member since 2013 · 99 posts · 82 votes
    1y
    Quote from @Account Closed:

    Just spoke with another attorney and CCH (Coalition) is a state program and depending on source of funding, may not fall under federal jurisdiction.  However, researching state laws is always a necessity.  Recent laws in CO change the financial responsibility from the tenant to the landlord and do not require the tenant to pay to restore!!  August 2024 was one of those.

    https://www.ottenjohnson.com/news/2024-legislative-updates-new-landlord-tenant-laws-in-colorado/#


     Complete BS, but at least you know the law in your state now regarding this situation.  Now you just have to figure out what is reasonable and what is not. 

  • Property Manager · Lombard, IL · Member since 2013 · 99 posts · 82 votes
    1y

    The fact that the tenant does not have to pay to restore modifications that were made for their benefit. 

  • Colleen F.Pro Member
    Investor · Narragansett, RI · Member since 2013 · 8k+ posts · 4k+ votes
    1y

    @Keith Jablonowski  I think what you posted says if the Housing provider receives federal assistance, not the tenant. 

    @Account Closed    To show that a requested modification may be necessary, there must be an identifiable relationship, or nexus, between the requested modification and the individual’s disability. Further, the modification must be “reasonable.”  So  the request must be needed basically to perform the life function impaired by the disability. She needs a gate she can open not necessarily an electronic gate. 

    Get a lawyer I don't see how this law requires you to pay for modifications but that what the lawyers are saying. There must be something else too. It does strike the requirement to restore modifications to the previous state too.   That is a big burden in some cases. I think your tenant saw a gravy train and hopped on. 
    2024a_1318_signed.p 

    My thought would be try to reset expectations in line with the law and also get her out. She sounds like a headache.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.