Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Insurance
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

222
Posts
38
Votes
Chris Stromdahl
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Seattle, WA
38
Votes |
222
Posts

Landlord "Loss of Use" liability?

Chris Stromdahl
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Seattle, WA
Posted

A friend of mine that owns one investment property recently warned me of the need to require tenants to have insurance due to the "loss of use" liability. 

The main water line to his property recently burst, flooding the entire basement and leaving the property uninhabitable. Luckily his tenants have family they can stay with, but he did not require them to have insurance, therefore they had no loss of use protection.

Question:

Do you require your tenants to have insurance?

In your experience, if a tenant chooses to not carry renter's insurance, is there any liability on behalf of the landlord in a scenario such as this/similar scenario? 

  • Just assume the landlord had been keeping the property up and the loss of use was not due to negligence.

Thanks, Chris

Loading replies...