Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Out of State Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 18 hours ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

15
Posts
9
Votes
Carissa Atendido
9
Votes |
15
Posts

All NEGATIVE cashflow when analyzing trying to buy my FIRST deal - WHY???

Carissa Atendido
Posted

I've been using the BP Rental Calculator and BiggerDeals to analyze potential properties for my first investment, but I'm running into a consistent issue — most of the properties I look at are showing negative monthly cash flow and really low COC returns.

I’m wondering: am I doing something wrong in my analysis, or is it just that good deals are really hard to come by in the current market?

Here are the assumptions I’m using (are these too conservative?):

  • 5% for maintenance & repairs

  • 5% for vacancy

  • 5% for capex

  • 10% for property management

My target price is $300K or below, and I’ve been looking in Nashville, Austin, Dallas, and Atlanta. I realize that’s a wide range of markets, but I’m trying to run as many deal analyses as possible to learn what works and what doesn’t.

For those with more experience:

  • Do these numbers seem reasonable?

  • Is it normal to see mostly negative cash flow deals, or should I be tweaking my filters?

  • Any tips for spotting better opportunities?

Thanks in advance — I really appreciate any feedback!

Carissa

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,430
Posts
2,768
Votes
Michael Smythe
#5 Classifieds Contributor
  • Property Manager
  • Metro Detroit
2,768
Votes |
4,430
Posts
Michael Smythe
#5 Classifieds Contributor
  • Property Manager
  • Metro Detroit
Replied

@Carissa Atendido here's some info that may require you to adjust your expectations.

The Real Estate Crash of 2008-2010 caused real estate prices to crash across the country - but didn't affect rent amounts. This caused a historically unique opportunity for investors - they could buy Class A properties and immediately cashflow when renting them out.

This couldn't last forever, and it didn't, as excited new investors drove up prices.

Eventually, Class A property values increased to the point that even increasing rents didn't allow them to cashflow upon purchase.

So, the flood of new investors switched to buying Class B properties.

COVID created a chaotic spike in both the sale & rental markets, attracting even more new real estate investors. According to CoreLogic, in December of 2023, almost 30% of home sales were to investors!

Investment also spiked in Class A Short-Term Rentals (STR) and investors started paying higher and higher prices based upon anticipated STR rental rates, that exceeded sustainability based upon Long-Term Rental rates (LTR).

Now we're seeing investors pouring money into buying Class C rentals - but, many are getting burned.

In our experience & opinion, the main determinant of property Class is not location or even property condition, those are #2 and #3. The #1 determinant is the Tenant Pool.

If you don't believe us, try putting several Class D tenants in Class A apartment buildings and watch what happens. Or try the reverse - rehab a property to Class A standards in a Class D neighborhood and try to get a Class A or B tenant to rent it.

Unfortunately, many newbie real estate investors are jumping into buying affordable Class C rentals - expecting Class A results.

In our opinion, Class C tenants have FICO scores from 560 to 620 - where their chance of default/nonpayment is 15-22%. See the chart from Fair Isaac Company (FICO) below:

FICO Score

Pct of Population

Default Probability

800 or more

13.00%

1.00%

750-799

27.00%

1.00%

700-749

18.00%

4.40%

650-699

15.00%

8.90%

600-649

12.00%

15.80%

550-599

8.00%

22.50%

500-549

5.00%

28.40%

Less than 499

2.00%

41.00%

Source: Fair Isaac Company

According to this chart, investors should use corresponding vacancy + tenant-nonperformance factors of approximately 5% for Class A rentals, 10% for Class B and 20% for Class C.

To address Class C payment challenges, many industry "experts" are now selling programs to newbie investors about how Section 8 tenants are the cure. If only it was that easy. Yes, the government pays the Section 8 rent timely, but more and more tenants are having to pay a portion of their rent. Then there are the challenges with Section 8 tenants paying utilities and taking care of their rental property.

Investors should fully understand that Section 8 is not a cure-all for Class C & D tenant challenges, it's just trading one set of problems for another.

We see too many investors not doing enough research to fully understand all this and making naïve investing decisions.

  • Michael Smythe
business profile image
Logical Property Management

Loading replies...