Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Calvin Thomas

Calvin Thomas has started 37 posts and replied 777 times.

Post: what happens to 500k

Calvin ThomasPosted
  • Developer
  • New York City, NY
  • Posts 812
  • Votes 711
Quote from @Allen Masry:
Quote from @Calvin Thomas:
Quote from @Allen Masry:

Hi, this is a little strange. I am just planning.  It appears I may get 500,000 settlement in a few months.  However, I was trying to think what is a good way to go with it.  For example, if I do S/P top stocks, I could get around 11%. 

but if I did real estate and I have a 800 credit score - could I do real estate and make it work harder doing turn key Multifamily.  I do want to thank people for taking the time to answer this.  What I like about real estate community you all are open about trials and tribulations.  When you talk to finance people they act like they are lawyers. It is hard to figure out if I will make anything but VERY clear the fees (lol).


 More importantly, how much experience do you have with real estate?  Will you go it on your own, or would you hire a PM?  Where do you want to invest?  NJ?  Do you know the laws of the land? Some of NJ's laws are worse than NYC or Cali.

Yes, 

NJ laws suck.  the only thing going for NJ most dense pop state in Nation.  I was thinking ohio / MI. Maybe PA.  But it looks like I will need to work on this much more. 

I will join some local real estate groups (act poor) and see what I learn.  Hopefully i can give back as well. 




 As long as you are in a decent area and do proper screening, you will be fine in NJ.  South Jersey more landlord friendly than North Jersey, but you have more appreciation in North Jersey.  Stay away from Philly as their laws are as tricky as NYC's.

I would strongly recommend you purchase something within an hours drive from you so you can learn on the job as a landlord.  Over time, you may want to hire a property management company as tenants can be headaches at times.  You need to be responsible, but firm.  

Post: what happens to 500k

Calvin ThomasPosted
  • Developer
  • New York City, NY
  • Posts 812
  • Votes 711
Quote from @Allen Masry:

Hi, this is a little strange. I am just planning.  It appears I may get 500,000 settlement in a few months.  However, I was trying to think what is a good way to go with it.  For example, if I do S/P top stocks, I could get around 11%. 

but if I did real estate and I have a 800 credit score - could I do real estate and make it work harder doing turn key Multifamily.  I do want to thank people for taking the time to answer this.  What I like about real estate community you all are open about trials and tribulations.  When you talk to finance people they act like they are lawyers. It is hard to figure out if I will make anything but VERY clear the fees (lol).


 More importantly, how much experience do you have with real estate?  Will you go it on your own, or would you hire a PM?  Where do you want to invest?  NJ?  Do you know the laws of the land? Some of NJ's laws are worse than NYC or Cali.

Post: What do you consider a "good" cash flow for a property in 2024?

Calvin ThomasPosted
  • Developer
  • New York City, NY
  • Posts 812
  • Votes 711
Quote from @Jonathan Small:

Cash flow goals depend on your investment strategy! Here's a breakdown:

  • Conservative: 8-10% after covering all expenses (mortgage, taxes, insurance, property management). Focuses on stable, long-term returns.  
  • Moderate: 10-12% after expenses. Aims for a balance between cash flow and potential appreciation.  @Matthew Paul it seems you recommend at least a 10% ROI.
  • Aggressive: 12%+ after expenses. Prioritizes maximizing cash flow, potentially with higher risk or management intensity.

Remember, cash flow isn't the only factor! Consider factors like appreciation potential, vacancy rates, and your overall investment goals. @Calvin Thomas would you do $100 cashflow if it was a high appreciation low vacancy market?

What's your investment strategy (conservative, moderate, aggressive)? What other factors are you considering besides cash flow? Sharing your goals can help others provide more specific advice!  @JD Martin makes a good point to consider your W2 income and your age.  The older I get the more cashflow I want and not willing to wait for appreciation.  

@Greg M.how did you get financing on a deal that is losing $700+ a month?  Is there something you can do to get to cashflow positive sooner than later?

Reserves are key as  @Theresa Harris has pointed out.   @Nathan Gesner pointed out my situation.  I stack cashflow for capex and repairs because I have a decent W2 job that I live off of.  Just like @Mark Cruse stated I don't want to loose money every month on any investment. I lean towards cashflowing deals.


 No.  $100 a door doesn't help cover the unexpected repairs.  In 2024, we've had to replace, in a few buildings:

Siding - $30k

Roof - $8k

Leaks - $3k

Turn-Overs - $20k+

Appliances - $5k

Now, I've been doing this for over 40 years, so I have a good amount of buildings.  We keep significant amounts of reserves in treasuries for these reasons.  That said, we don't have a door that earns less than $600 a month.  We only do mixed-use and multi-family.

A $100 a month per door isn't worth my time.  Our buildings are in high growth markets in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania.  Any investor would get killed by earning $100 a month per door in these areas.

Post: Why an LLC may not protect you from a Lawsuit

Calvin ThomasPosted
  • Developer
  • New York City, NY
  • Posts 812
  • Votes 711
Quote from @John Underwood:

I stumbled across this lawsuit while looking for something else.

As I have mentioned before in this forum an LLC that is not 100% property ran can easily be pierced and the owner sued personally.

Here is an example of where an attorney went after someone that thought their LLC would protect them:

18. Upon information and belief, the member(s) of the Defendant have failed to observe any corporate formalities in that: a. b. c. d. e. f. g.

19. The members did not observe corporate formality; The Defendant did not pay dividends; The Defendant was insolvent at the time of its actions; The Defendant’s members siphoned funds from the Defendant for their own personal use; The Defendant’s members comingled funds; There are no corporate records; The corporation(s) were a facade and alter ego of the member(s) of the Defendant. In addition to the eight (8) factors laid out above, failing to pierce the corporate veil in this matter would create an elementary injustice and fundamental unfairness. The member(s) of the Defendant have used the corporate shell as a way to avoid any liability for the serious injuries that were caused to the Plaintiff and others by the reckless action of the Defendant’s member(s) and agents. With this in mind, Plaintiff should have compensation directly from the member(s) if the same cannot be had from the corporate Defendant. To deny this compensation would create an injustice and fundamental unfairness.

20. For the reasons and for other reasons to be proven, the Plaintiff is entitled to pierce the corporate veil and assert individual liability against the member(s) of the Defendant.


It's always best to have multi-member LLC. You have a stronger ability to not allow a court action to pierce the corporate veil. You can have a parent LLC owned by two trusts, 50/50 and you'd have double the protection. Since it's trust ownership, there are some additional benefits. As always, speak to a lawyer. This shouldn't be taken as legal advice. However, this is how I've done it. The Kushner's do it this way, as well as President Trump. So, some food for thought.

Post: How important is it for a first property to be easy for me to get to?

Calvin ThomasPosted
  • Developer
  • New York City, NY
  • Posts 812
  • Votes 711
Quote from @Matt Wan:
Quote from @Calvin Thomas:
Quote from @Matt Wan:

I'm thinking of buying US real estate as an overseas investor. How important is it for me to be able to easily visit my target market? I can get a direct flight to major metropolitan areas, but it would be much more difficult to get to Topeka or North Dakota, for example.

I feel that I'd like to see the market at least once, to get a feel for the area and to meet the local team. The cost of that trip would effectively be included in my purchase price. Once the initial setup is finished, how often do you visit? Do you ever have to take a last-minute trip?


How much knowledge do you have on US real estate?


 Nothing unfortunately. But my local real estate market is unreasonable for investing. I'm in a 1,300 sq ft apartment that's worth about $1.5 million and rents for $3,000 per month.


 It's always best to start local and then gain experience as you go through the motions as a new landlord.  With out you local, you can be considered an easy target to be taken advantage of.

Post: Where to find Owner Phone Number for Run Down or Abandon Properties?

Calvin ThomasPosted
  • Developer
  • New York City, NY
  • Posts 812
  • Votes 711
Quote from @Nevin Wilkie:

Hey, Y'all quick question. I have recently started writing down addresses of run down or abandoned properties that I would like to purchase, but I only have the owner's name. How do I get the phone numbers of the owners of the properties? I have used Prop wire for some skip traces, but the numbers and emails it provides were not associated with the property. Is there a better way to contact the owners of these properties?

Here you go -

https://www.albanycountyny.gov/government/county-clerk/servi...

Post: How important is it for a first property to be easy for me to get to?

Calvin ThomasPosted
  • Developer
  • New York City, NY
  • Posts 812
  • Votes 711
Quote from @Matt Wan:

I'm thinking of buying US real estate as an overseas investor. How important is it for me to be able to easily visit my target market? I can get a direct flight to major metropolitan areas, but it would be much more difficult to get to Topeka or North Dakota, for example.

I feel that I'd like to see the market at least once, to get a feel for the area and to meet the local team. The cost of that trip would effectively be included in my purchase price. Once the initial setup is finished, how often do you visit? Do you ever have to take a last-minute trip?


How much knowledge do you have on US real estate?

Quote from @Cory M.:

I just got billed $365 by my property manager for replacing a toilet fill valve and supply line. That seems a bit high to me, but I figured I should check before I get too upset about it. Does anyone local to Memphis know what the going rate for simple repairs like that should be? 

Checking Home Depot, it looks like parts would be $30 or less. That leaves $335 for labor and the property manager's fees. Is it reasonable for me to ask the property manager for a breakdown of parts/labor costs?


 In metro NYC, it's around $275/$300 all day.  It is wise for the PM to use a licensed plumber. Reason being, if something goes wrong, the PM is covered (and so are you) by the plumber's insurance and license.

Apparently, this is around the same price other people around the US are paying.  See below.

https://www.reddit.com/r/askaplumber/comments/1dec1o2/is_this_a_reasonable_price/?rdt=49346

It's never worth being penny wise and dollar foolish.

Post: Are Solar Panels Worth It?

Calvin ThomasPosted
  • Developer
  • New York City, NY
  • Posts 812
  • Votes 711
Quote from @Kevin Sobilo:
Quote from @Calvin Thomas:
Quote from @Kevin Sobilo:
Quote from @Calvin Thomas:
Quote from @Kevin Sobilo:

@Griffin Malcolm, I don't have any statistics and I'm not sure there will be any that I would consider reliable. So, here is how I would look at it.

For owner occupied homes, the typical buyer is NOT analytical. They are not able to assign a value to things like roof age. To them a 5 year old roof is in good shape for the near future the same as a 18 year old roof. Also consider that green energy is not universally accepted. Many people on principle alone may not want solar panels as hard as that may be to understand. Demand is what drives up price/value. So, if 25% of potential buyers eschew the concept of solar panels the demand doesn't drive up the price in the same way an above ground pool doesn't add appreciable value.

For functional aspects of the home the buyer usually just looks for potential issues but doesn't analyze the differences for valuation purposes. Where they "see" value is what makes them interested in the home which is how they imagine it will be for them to live in. When a buyer starts talking about how it will be to live in the home you KNOW they are interested. Those aspects of the home are where they "see" value differences for themselves. 

However, for a commercial property or a commercial residential (5+ unit) property value is based on the income approach and reducing expenses in this case by producing electricity factors into that math and very well might increase the valuation enough to make sense. So, from a business point of view with a commercial property it could be a good investment with a good ROI.

If solar panels provided a good ROI on owner occupied homes, then builders building spec homes would include them as standard to reap the reward!


 They are obsolete as soon as you install them.  The technology is getting better, cheaper and thinner. The price to savings ratio, at least in the Northeast isn't there.  It's better to invest into insulation and possibly a new HVAC system than solar.


How do you survive using just a flip-phone and not a smart phone? I mean smart phones are obsolete as soon as you buy it. So, buying one would not yet make sense to you?!? Sorry for the sarcasm, but trying to make a point.

I would suggest you think like an investor. Newbie investors are always trying to decide if NOW is the right time to buy an investment and that isn't really a very good question. When you see a good deal you buy it. So, NOW is ALWAYS the right time if the investor sees a deal that's inside his/her buy-box.

With any kind of long term investment (especially real estate) TIME is huge force. It might not matter at all if technology will improve. If your investment window is 20 years and you buy todays technology you may well have a better result than waiting 10 years and having half the investment window to buy. Also, you can evaluate today's deal whereas you can only speculate what deal may be available in 10 years.

You are correct that insulation is almost certainly a bigger bang for the buck in a heating climate. MAYBE HVAC, but that is less clear because the total cost of ownership of a very efficient system might not be that much better than a mid-grade system these days.

Neither of those things affect whether solar is a good deal on its own. The tangible/measurable benefits do seem to pan out over the life of the system especially if energy prices continue to rise. You also need to consider intangible benefits. Right now in fact there are still people here in the northeast without power from last Thursday/Friday's storm. Those people are wishing they had a solar system with some battery storage about now after days of suffering without.

 One can survive on a flip phone and not have a smartphone just fine. The Orthodox Jews in NYC (and I am sure elsewhere) have no issues transacting millions of dollars of business each and every year on a flip phone.

The tech for solar panels is just not there.  It's a hindrance, not a help.  In a decade, who knows, but now, no dice.


So, what you're saying is that you were incorrect on that point because the only people you could give an example of using a flip phone don't do it because a smart phone is outdated as soon as you buy it. 

You also gave no specific reason you believe the technology "is just not there". Giving no reason is effectively the same as having no opinion. 


 I don't get into pissing matches online.  Whatever you believe, you can believe.  Enjoy.

Post: Are Solar Panels Worth It?

Calvin ThomasPosted
  • Developer
  • New York City, NY
  • Posts 812
  • Votes 711
Quote from @Kevin Sobilo:
Quote from @Calvin Thomas:
Quote from @Kevin Sobilo:

@Griffin Malcolm, I don't have any statistics and I'm not sure there will be any that I would consider reliable. So, here is how I would look at it.

For owner occupied homes, the typical buyer is NOT analytical. They are not able to assign a value to things like roof age. To them a 5 year old roof is in good shape for the near future the same as a 18 year old roof. Also consider that green energy is not universally accepted. Many people on principle alone may not want solar panels as hard as that may be to understand. Demand is what drives up price/value. So, if 25% of potential buyers eschew the concept of solar panels the demand doesn't drive up the price in the same way an above ground pool doesn't add appreciable value.

For functional aspects of the home the buyer usually just looks for potential issues but doesn't analyze the differences for valuation purposes. Where they "see" value is what makes them interested in the home which is how they imagine it will be for them to live in. When a buyer starts talking about how it will be to live in the home you KNOW they are interested. Those aspects of the home are where they "see" value differences for themselves. 

However, for a commercial property or a commercial residential (5+ unit) property value is based on the income approach and reducing expenses in this case by producing electricity factors into that math and very well might increase the valuation enough to make sense. So, from a business point of view with a commercial property it could be a good investment with a good ROI.

If solar panels provided a good ROI on owner occupied homes, then builders building spec homes would include them as standard to reap the reward!


 They are obsolete as soon as you install them.  The technology is getting better, cheaper and thinner. The price to savings ratio, at least in the Northeast isn't there.  It's better to invest into insulation and possibly a new HVAC system than solar.


How do you survive using just a flip-phone and not a smart phone? I mean smart phones are obsolete as soon as you buy it. So, buying one would not yet make sense to you?!? Sorry for the sarcasm, but trying to make a point.

I would suggest you think like an investor. Newbie investors are always trying to decide if NOW is the right time to buy an investment and that isn't really a very good question. When you see a good deal you buy it. So, NOW is ALWAYS the right time if the investor sees a deal that's inside his/her buy-box.

With any kind of long term investment (especially real estate) TIME is huge force. It might not matter at all if technology will improve. If your investment window is 20 years and you buy todays technology you may well have a better result than waiting 10 years and having half the investment window to buy. Also, you can evaluate today's deal whereas you can only speculate what deal may be available in 10 years.

You are correct that insulation is almost certainly a bigger bang for the buck in a heating climate. MAYBE HVAC, but that is less clear because the total cost of ownership of a very efficient system might not be that much better than a mid-grade system these days.

Neither of those things affect whether solar is a good deal on its own. The tangible/measurable benefits do seem to pan out over the life of the system especially if energy prices continue to rise. You also need to consider intangible benefits. Right now in fact there are still people here in the northeast without power from last Thursday/Friday's storm. Those people are wishing they had a solar system with some battery storage about now after days of suffering without.

 One can survive on a flip phone and not have a smartphone just fine. The Orthodox Jews in NYC (and I am sure elsewhere) have no issues transacting millions of dollars of business each and every year on a flip phone.

The tech for solar panels is just not there.  It's a hindrance, not a help.  In a decade, who knows, but now, no dice.