Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Chris Mason

Chris Mason has started 100 posts and replied 9560 times.

Post: Choosing between higher income or better credit applicants

Chris Mason
ModeratorPosted
  • Lender
  • California
  • Posts 9,935
  • Votes 10,791

I'd give both groups a 2nd pass, looking at DTI instead of HTI ("3x" = 33% HTI). For DTI, just add in the car, student loan, etc, payments, and divide by income.

And I'd give the credit people a 2nd pass too, looking at the story it tells. A medical collection account from 4 years ago is VERY different than a car repo from 2 years ago, for multiple reasons, not the least of which is that they probably didn't plan to get sick, but they DID plan to buy that car ahead of time that they couldn't afford. I'm in an industry that obsesses over the numerical FICO score rather than the 'story,' I'd love to have those handcuffs off and be able to focus on that instead. 

Devil is in the details. 

Post: Confused about how projected rental income for mortgage applicati

Chris Mason
ModeratorPosted
  • Lender
  • California
  • Posts 9,935
  • Votes 10,791
Originally posted by @Severino Cuison:

I am planning to sell my house located in Stockton, CA and buy 2-3 single family homes in the Phoenix, AZ area to have better cash flow. I currently rent my house by the rooms, and I have been successfully doing so in the past two years and I want to continue to do the same business model on my next rental properties. I can do a conventional loan for two single family houses with my full-time job, but my wish is to buy three. I will have 20% down payment for three single family homes using my current house proceed once it is sold. Buying three, however, will stretch my DTI. I plan to buy brand new houses; their prices are not much different from old houses plus I get the advantage of not dealing with house repair/maintenance with an old house. When I apply for a mortgage, can I also use projected income that I may get from a new house without rental history? What about from a house that still to be built by a builder? Thanks for the input! I really appreciate it.

 Yup, you can use projected rental income from the property you are buying. Just make sure you're working with someone local for the mortgage who knows what they are doing, not one of the covid refi churners.

Post: Virtual Appraisal suggestions?

Chris Mason
ModeratorPosted
  • Lender
  • California
  • Posts 9,935
  • Votes 10,791
Originally posted by @Eric Thomas:

@Chris Mason, thanks very much for the feedback.  When talking to the local appraisers, I was expecting to pay for the full/traditional approach and not getting a one-off version - just couldn't find anyone to do it.  Since I haven't seen any feedback about virtual appraisals being available, I'll just try calling the local guys again and be more specific about that, along with making sure they know I can provide pictures easily and that no underwriters or loan officers need to be involved. Hopefully that will get things rolling.

I feel a bit like Julia Roberts in "pretty woman" running around with money in my hand but can't get anyone to take it.

Thanks again!

As mentioned, if you get sick if it and just want a solution, call your go-to LO and just have them order an appraisal for a phantom refi through the 'normal' channels.

Post: Virtual Appraisal suggestions?

Chris Mason
ModeratorPosted
  • Lender
  • California
  • Posts 9,935
  • Votes 10,791
Originally posted by @Eric Thomas:

Does anybody have suggestions on any virtual appraisers out there who will do work for investors rather than banks? We have a property in a trust where the grantor has recently passed, and we need to establish a "step up" basis for tax assessment. I've called a half dozen appraisers and nobody will touch it - either way too busy with their bank and mortgage work, or because it's outside of their city/zone (rural Alabama).  Seems like the need for this would have kicked up a bit during the pandemic, but maybe not.

Thanks!

(sorry if cross-posting... I asked this in "starting out" last week, but no suggestions yet)

 Once in a blue moon I've heard a past client say this, who is sick of calling around, and I'll just place the order through our normal channels as basically a "phantom refi" appraisal and a favor, but the person obviously winds up paying for and getting a full/traditional/standard appraisal, not a 'virtual' one. From the perspective of the appraiser, this is just another one on the assembly line, not a one-off, so it gets done just like the rest. Not a one-off type thing.

Appraisers have just had the best 2 years of their entire careers. If they get any whiff of someone trying to save money on an appraisal fee as a one-off, no surprise that they'd ghost ya. In general this isn't the labor market for cheapos, that's doubly so if the 'labor' in question is one that's BOOMING due to the pandemic. Visiting the property in person isn't the most time consuming part of an appraisal, so expecting some massive discount is off-base. And, naturally, the cheapos don't have a pattern of being the easiest to work with (they never do, in anything, full stop, no exceptions), the pattern is that they are more difficult, not less. 

Instead, if you want to order it with an appraiser directly as a one-off, pitch it simply as them saving on the "appraisal management company" middle man fee (they hate AMCs in general [so do lenders, in case you're wondering], so you're scratching that itch). If you pay $600 for an appraisal ordered through a lender, the appraiser only gets about $400 or $450 of that b/c of the stupid AMC taking their cut. Offer them $500, and you will send them a bunch of pictures of the property to save them the drive, something like that is probably the sweet spot. And guarantee them they won't have to interact with a mortgage underwriter or a realtor or a loan officer (people they regard as annoyances) to boot. So you pay less, they net more, and it's slightly less work. Now, we're realistically checking boxes for a one-off.

Post: Pros and Cons of getting a Real Estate License

Chris Mason
ModeratorPosted
  • Lender
  • California
  • Posts 9,935
  • Votes 10,791

If you need to ask, it's probably not worth the hassle. 

There are 100% REI who get their real estate agent license, and benefit from it. A common characteristic is that they don't need to ask the question, since the answer is obvious to them.

Post: DTI: car, HOA, IRS payments

Chris Mason
ModeratorPosted
  • Lender
  • California
  • Posts 9,935
  • Votes 10,791

Honestly, if you're that far into the weeds, it's probably time to get off of Web MD and go talk to a real doctor. Good chance the issue isn't actually the back ache you've been focused on, it's something else you aren't thinking of and may not  have known about, maybe even with a super quick and easy fix not even on your radar, because you're down the wrong rabbit hole.

Post: Do rental properties count in your DTI ratio?

Chris Mason
ModeratorPosted
  • Lender
  • California
  • Posts 9,935
  • Votes 10,791
Originally posted by @Ellie Narie:
Originally posted by @Chris Mason:
Originally posted by @Ellie Narie:
Originally posted by @Chris Mason:
Originally posted by @Ellie Narie:
Originally posted by @Chris Mason:
Originally posted by @Ellie Narie:
Originally posted by @Reid Chauvin:

Well in the situation you described the debt for the rental property shouldn't have that material of an effect on your DTI, as much of the debt is covered by the rental income. In some instances, individuals cash flow well enough on their property for it to actually lower their DTI. There are also loan products that don't take DTI into consideration.

How would I calculate the DTI? I wasn't sure if I was calculating it properly in the above example.

I read somewhere that DTI is calculated without taking rental properties into consideration. So, if the 75% of the rental income offsets the PITI completely, then the DTI is supposed to be 0% with the situation above (since there's no other debt)... So I'm not sure if that's the right way to calculate DTI, or if my way above is the right way?

Suppose your DTI is $4000 / $10000 = 40%, without the rental property.

There are about a half dozen ways to calculate the net cashflow that are situation dependent, but suppose the resulting number is -$50/mo in one scenario, and $50/mo in another. The rents, the expenses, the mortgage payment, have all already been baked into that number, so we do not need to include them a second time.

For the negative cashflow scenario, that's included in the debt column. So the DTI would be $4050 / $10k = 40.5%.

For the positive cashflow scenario, the net number is included in the income column. So the DTI would be $4000 / $10,050 = 39.8%.

Note that the math is less generous for owner occupied 2-4 unit real estate. The lower down payment requirement & better rate is why they don't get the more generous treatment that non-owner occ loan applicants get. Non-owner occ, you're fronting a larger down payment & sucking up a higher interest rate or fees (or both), so you get the most generous arithmetic. 

I see, so does that arithmetic only work for non-owner occupied investment properties? How do they calculate it for owner occupied? 

Income goes on the income column, PITI/expense goes on the debt column.

Same house, same data, calculated differently. Let's suppose that $50 positive came from $3000 rent (after applying the 75% thing) and $2950 expenses. Ah, but it's owner occupied, you obviously can't collect rent from the unit of the duplex that you're living in. So now it's $1500 in rental income, $2950 expenses. But we're not done. You're also putting down 3.5% on an FHA loan, so the PITI isn't $2950, it's $3600.

Starting:

$4000 / $10000 = 40%.

Let's suppose that $2000 of that $4k was their personal rent. Cars, personal debt, student loans, etc, are the other $2k/mo. They're buying a primary residence, so the rent they are presently paying goes away, but the cars and student loans aren't going away.

$2000 / $10000 = 20%

We need to add in the $1500 in rental income, and the $3600 of expenses. 

($2000 + $3600) / ($10,000 + $1500) = $5600 / $11,500 = 48%.

Same exact house, 25% down investment property v 3.5% down owner occ. 

Ah, I see. So if the owner is currently occupying that property, and then decides to get another loan for another property (which the owner will move into) - then would the current property's dti ratio be calculated with the "generous" arithmetic? As in, if the rents cover the piti, it wouldn't really affect the dti? 

So, essentially, you could get 10 properties without increasing your regular income? 

It's not going to pan out if you're trying to do multi->multi->multi, but it's realistic, and can pan out that way, if it's SFR->SFR->SFR.

I know someone on house #7 in Oakland that would put just 5% down for the first 4. Around house #5, #1 had enough equity to do a cash out refi, so lately she's been putting more down to improve cashflow. For #6, #2 had enough equity for a cash out refi, and so on. She legit moves in and lives there for 12 months each time, and yes we have ways to check for that.

What would be the problem with getting multi-family properties this way? Is it just that FHA loans need to be refinanced, and that the properties need 20% equity for that?

If you want to build a 2-4 unit empire, focus instead on how you're going to get 20% to 25% down over and over again. Those are the people with multifam empires in desirable real estate markets in the real world. Very consistently. 

Post: Do rental properties count in your DTI ratio?

Chris Mason
ModeratorPosted
  • Lender
  • California
  • Posts 9,935
  • Votes 10,791
Originally posted by @Ellie Narie:
Originally posted by @Chris Mason:
Originally posted by @Ellie Narie:
Originally posted by @Chris Mason:
Originally posted by @Ellie Narie:
Originally posted by @Reid Chauvin:

Well in the situation you described the debt for the rental property shouldn't have that material of an effect on your DTI, as much of the debt is covered by the rental income. In some instances, individuals cash flow well enough on their property for it to actually lower their DTI. There are also loan products that don't take DTI into consideration.

How would I calculate the DTI? I wasn't sure if I was calculating it properly in the above example.

I read somewhere that DTI is calculated without taking rental properties into consideration. So, if the 75% of the rental income offsets the PITI completely, then the DTI is supposed to be 0% with the situation above (since there's no other debt)... So I'm not sure if that's the right way to calculate DTI, or if my way above is the right way?

Suppose your DTI is $4000 / $10000 = 40%, without the rental property.

There are about a half dozen ways to calculate the net cashflow that are situation dependent, but suppose the resulting number is -$50/mo in one scenario, and $50/mo in another. The rents, the expenses, the mortgage payment, have all already been baked into that number, so we do not need to include them a second time.

For the negative cashflow scenario, that's included in the debt column. So the DTI would be $4050 / $10k = 40.5%.

For the positive cashflow scenario, the net number is included in the income column. So the DTI would be $4000 / $10,050 = 39.8%.

Note that the math is less generous for owner occupied 2-4 unit real estate. The lower down payment requirement & better rate is why they don't get the more generous treatment that non-owner occ loan applicants get. Non-owner occ, you're fronting a larger down payment & sucking up a higher interest rate or fees (or both), so you get the most generous arithmetic. 

I see, so does that arithmetic only work for non-owner occupied investment properties? How do they calculate it for owner occupied? 

Income goes on the income column, PITI/expense goes on the debt column.

Same house, same data, calculated differently. Let's suppose that $50 positive came from $3000 rent (after applying the 75% thing) and $2950 expenses. Ah, but it's owner occupied, you obviously can't collect rent from the unit of the duplex that you're living in. So now it's $1500 in rental income, $2950 expenses. But we're not done. You're also putting down 3.5% on an FHA loan, so the PITI isn't $2950, it's $3600.

Starting:

$4000 / $10000 = 40%.

Let's suppose that $2000 of that $4k was their personal rent. Cars, personal debt, student loans, etc, are the other $2k/mo. They're buying a primary residence, so the rent they are presently paying goes away, but the cars and student loans aren't going away.

$2000 / $10000 = 20%

We need to add in the $1500 in rental income, and the $3600 of expenses. 

($2000 + $3600) / ($10,000 + $1500) = $5600 / $11,500 = 48%.

Same exact house, 25% down investment property v 3.5% down owner occ. 

Ah, I see. So if the owner is currently occupying that property, and then decides to get another loan for another property (which the owner will move into) - then would the current property's dti ratio be calculated with the "generous" arithmetic? As in, if the rents cover the piti, it wouldn't really affect the dti? 

So, essentially, you could get 10 properties without increasing your regular income? 

It's not going to pan out if you're trying to do multi->multi->multi, but it's realistic, and can pan out that way, if it's SFR->SFR->SFR.

I know someone on house #7 in Oakland that would put just 5% down for the first 4. Around house #5, #1 had enough equity to do a cash out refi, so lately she's been putting more down to improve cashflow. For #6, #2 had enough equity for a cash out refi, and so on. She legit moves in and lives there for 12 months each time, and yes we have ways to check for that.

Post: Do rental properties count in your DTI ratio?

Chris Mason
ModeratorPosted
  • Lender
  • California
  • Posts 9,935
  • Votes 10,791
Originally posted by @Ellie Narie:
Originally posted by @Chris Mason:
Originally posted by @Ellie Narie:
Originally posted by @Reid Chauvin:

Well in the situation you described the debt for the rental property shouldn't have that material of an effect on your DTI, as much of the debt is covered by the rental income. In some instances, individuals cash flow well enough on their property for it to actually lower their DTI. There are also loan products that don't take DTI into consideration.

How would I calculate the DTI? I wasn't sure if I was calculating it properly in the above example.

I read somewhere that DTI is calculated without taking rental properties into consideration. So, if the 75% of the rental income offsets the PITI completely, then the DTI is supposed to be 0% with the situation above (since there's no other debt)... So I'm not sure if that's the right way to calculate DTI, or if my way above is the right way?

Suppose your DTI is $4000 / $10000 = 40%, without the rental property.

There are about a half dozen ways to calculate the net cashflow that are situation dependent, but suppose the resulting number is -$50/mo in one scenario, and $50/mo in another. The rents, the expenses, the mortgage payment, have all already been baked into that number, so we do not need to include them a second time.

For the negative cashflow scenario, that's included in the debt column. So the DTI would be $4050 / $10k = 40.5%.

For the positive cashflow scenario, the net number is included in the income column. So the DTI would be $4000 / $10,050 = 39.8%.

Note that the math is less generous for owner occupied 2-4 unit real estate. The lower down payment requirement & better rate is why they don't get the more generous treatment that non-owner occ loan applicants get. Non-owner occ, you're fronting a larger down payment & sucking up a higher interest rate or fees (or both), so you get the most generous arithmetic. 

I see, so does that arithmetic only work for non-owner occupied investment properties? How do they calculate it for owner occupied? 

Income goes on the income column, PITI/expense goes on the debt column.

Same house, same data, calculated differently. Let's suppose that $50 positive came from $3000 rent (after applying the 75% thing) and $2950 expenses. Ah, but it's owner occupied, you obviously can't collect rent from the unit of the duplex that you're living in. So now it's $1500 in rental income, $2950 expenses. But we're not done. You're also putting down 3.5% on an FHA loan, so the PITI isn't $2950, it's $3600.

Starting:

$4000 / $10000 = 40%.

Let's suppose that $2000 of that $4k was their personal rent. Cars, personal debt, student loans, etc, are the other $2k/mo. They're buying a primary residence, so the rent they are presently paying goes away, but the cars and student loans aren't going away.

$2000 / $10000 = 20%

We need to add in the $1500 in rental income, and the $3600 of expenses. 

($2000 + $3600) / ($10,000 + $1500) = $5600 / $11,500 = 48%.

Same exact house, 25% down investment property v 3.5% down owner occ. 

Post: ~~ Buying Real Estate in the Winter! + 2022 Loan Limits ~~

Chris Mason
ModeratorPosted
  • Lender
  • California
  • Posts 9,935
  • Votes 10,791
Originally posted by @Harish V.:

Oh BTW new loan limits are

$ 647,200 $ 828,700 $ 1,001,650 $ 1,244,850

 It's actually even crazier than that in the HCOL cities in California... Bay Area, Orange County, Los Angeles: