Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Clifford Firthh

Clifford Firthh has started 5 posts and replied 14 times.

Quote from @Peter Walther:
Quote from @Caroline Gerardo:

@Peter Walther read what he said. Clifford has zero ownership, he's thinking about making a deal. Clifford has no rights to information from the servicer/ note trustee/ or lender. Read the law you posted. He is not a fiduciary, he is not on title, has no authorization from owner. When shopping for options a buyer cannot find out the terms/conditions/order payoffs. Why would you quote something that does not apply in FL or CA?

a mortgagor, a record title owner of the property, a fiduciary or trustee lawfully acting on behalf of a record title owner, or any other person lawfully authorized to act on behalf of a mortgagor or record title owner of the property,


Let me try on more time, neither you nor I know what interest Clifford may have in the property, if any.  He originally wrote "they (presumably the Owner) have tried to obtain a payoff to sell the property, but the holder of the seller carryback will not give a payoff."  Clifford to not allege or imply that he is trying to obtain a payoff.  To which you replied, "Servicer is under zero obligation to respond to payoff requests, or any inquiry from people who are not on the original note and deed of trust."

I merely pointed out your advice is incorrect as to mortgages secured by Florida property.  Anyone lawfully representing the mortgagor or record title holder in entitled to a payoff within 10 days of a written request.  I really don't understand why you're making such a big deal about this.

As an aside, the OP doesn't mention anything about a servicer being involved.


This is correct. The owner has tried to get a payoff, not myself. There is also no servicer, payments were made directly. I appreciate the information!

Quote from @Douglas Snook:

Also the bankruptcy is an other wrinkle. What Chapter was filed? If it was a 13, perhaps the arrearage was paid and that is why BOA is deeding it back. 

Have you talked to someone claiming the own it and wants to sell it to you or are you just searching around?

Would definitely have a professional title exam done. They will point out any problems they see but you might need an attorney to explain it and what the possible solution is.


This was a friend of mines property. He got caught up financially and was told he could do a loan mod, but it never got approved and he ended up giving up on everything and filed chapter 7. We were just looking it up to see what ever happened with it and came across all of this and thought it was quite strange so was looking for others thoughts on it. 15+ years of sitting idle/vacant, figured it was worth a look into it.

Quote from @Account Closed:
Quote from @Clifford Firthh:

Got a strange scenario that played out today and I am looking to see if anyone has any insight or knowledge on this:

Rehab property in Massachusetts was purchased back in the early 2000's. It never got finished and the owner got foreclosed in 2008. It got assigned a few times due to BOA mergers from 09-11. Owner filed bankruptcy in 2011. Then in 2014 BOA filed a "Release of mortgage/Deed of trust" and quit claimed it back to the original owner for $1. And then in 2018 the city filed a "instrument of taking" naming BOA for a couple thousand in back taxes, but never did anything further.
So many questions on this. But I guess mainly, who actually owns this property? Do banks deed properties back like this? 

It's possible that the property was part of the MERS robo signing signature scandal and the problem of false agency. Because it was assigned and mergers happened and then a bankruptcy, no one knew who actually had ownership of the note. In the ensuing confusion, no one could or couldn't prove who had the authority to speak for the note. 

So, BofA released any real or possible claim of interest. 

But the city didn't buy that and charged BofA for the taxes. Since BofA rejected the city's claim, when it got to court (or more likely negotiation) the city couldn't prove BofA had any interest in the property, so they dropped their claim. 

With no one to go after for the claim of taxes, the city threw up it's hands and went off to harass other law abiding, tax paying individuals. I don't have a clue if this is how it actually went down, but it sounds good to me.

I suspect someone is paying the county property taxes. That is who I would talk to and ask why they are paying the property taxes.


Thanks Ken, you nailed it. Everything is in fact listed as MERS. So, would this legally have reverted back to the original owner? Have you dealt with any of these? Next step to reach out to the city to see who is paying then?

Got a strange scenario that played out today and I am looking to see if anyone has any insight or knowledge on this:

Rehab property in Massachusetts was purchased back in the early 2000's. It never got finished and the owner got foreclosed in 2008. It got assigned a few times due to BOA mergers from 09-11. Owner filed bankruptcy in 2011. Then in 2014 BOA filed a "Release of mortgage/Deed of trust" and quit claimed it back to the original owner for $1. And then in 2018 the city filed a "instrument of taking" naming BOA for a couple thousand in back taxes, but never did anything further.


So many questions on this. But I guess mainly, who actually owns this property? Do banks deed properties back like this? 

Quote from @Peter Walther:

In my experience, most states have a statutory requirement for a lender to provide the borrower, or the borrower's representative, a payoff letter.  I'd find the statute in the property's state and send a certified letter referencing it to the lender demanding the payoff.


 Thanks Peter, I'm going to pm you. 

Thanks Chris, appreciate the response.

Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:

there are legal ways to pay these off.. check with title company first for free what they require to get title insurance for new buyer.  other wise probably need a lawyer to file some sort of quiet title action to force the issue. 


 Thanks Jay, I appreciate the response.

Looking for advice on a property I'm working on. Owner had left the property about a year ago to take care of a sick relative and squatters took over the property and they haven't been able to return. They have tried to obtain a payoff to sell the property, but the holder of the seller carryback will not give a payoff. The loan is approximately 12 years into a 30-year term. No prepayment penalty. Has anyone ever dealt with this?

Post: Memorandum - End buyer?

Clifford FirthhPosted
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 1

Bump

Post: Memorandum - End buyer?

Clifford FirthhPosted
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 1

Hi all,

When purchasing an assignment contract from a wholesaler and the actual "seller" completely disappears the week of closing, do you as the end buyer file a memorandum? Wondering how everyone deals with this.

Thanks!