All Forum Posts by: Kevin D.
Kevin D. has started 3 posts and replied 25 times.
Post: My first out-of-state turnkey was a bust (sort of)

- Real Estate Investor
- Milpitas, CA
- Posts 26
- Votes 19
I am doing due diligence on turnkey companies and one of the recommended company is Memphis Invest. I know that @Chris Clothier mentioned that he runs things differently (honesty, integrity, customer service), yet I'm researching his property management group and the reviews are, simply put, atrocious, both on YP and Google Reviews. I am not making any accusations here, just presenting the facts as I found them. I will readily admit that what I found may be wrong and my information may not be correct.
The conflicting advice on here is great and of course, the investor is solely responsible for his or her purchase. However, based on the supporting evidence, I am not so sure if there is such a thing as a true "turnkey" investment.
Post: Advice on turn key investment in Texas

- Real Estate Investor
- Milpitas, CA
- Posts 26
- Votes 19
Thank you everyone. Your advice has been invaluable, both in saving me money and aggravation. What not to do is just as invaluable as what to do. I truly appreciate it.
Post: Advice on turn key investment in Texas

- Real Estate Investor
- Milpitas, CA
- Posts 26
- Votes 19
@Gautam Venkatesan that is precisely the advice I'm looking for. I thought it looked off. Yes, Texas is supposed to be a high property tax state so the 2500 figure surprised me. Here is the link to their numbers http://investorlink.net/uploads/finance/122/86f76c...
What is the property tax average for Dallas Ft Worth based on 150k? There are no HOA fees, and the company provide their own pm so I assume that's the number they are basing it on.
Post: Advice on turn key investment in Texas

- Real Estate Investor
- Milpitas, CA
- Posts 26
- Votes 19
Hi,
I am looking to investing out of state. My primary goal is to have a passive income stream without requiring too much headaches (I know, asking a lot). With investing out of states, I want the property to be as hands off as possible because I just cannot be there. With that said, I am thinking of purchasing new developments in relatively nicer neighborhoods. I am looking for cash flow areas and do not expect appreciation although it would be nice. If the investment turns out to be more trouble than its worth, I want to be able to sell and recoup my money back with minimal hassle (wishful thinking I know).
For those in the area, can you tell me if the numbers the turn key company provide seem reasonable?
150k for a 1800 sq ft new build in the Red Oak TX area. ARV is supposedly 170k (I'm not counting on that). Income is expected to be 1400 a month. With property taxes, 5% vacancy, 7% pm, insurance, maintenance reserves, come out to about 5800 per year.. After debt service, cash flow should be about 300. That's not bad if the property can be a long term rental with relatively few headaches.
Do these numbers look right? Thanks in advance for your advice.
Post: Why appreciation matters in the SF/Bay Area

- Real Estate Investor
- Milpitas, CA
- Posts 26
- Votes 19
Originally posted by @Johnson H.:
@Kevin D. - With a cash buy, you are right the you'll be earning 4-5% cash on cash return and you maybe able to get the same kind of return with a mutual fund. The difference is that as a physical asset in a Class B+/A- location, rents are stable and you'll be receiving monthly checks like a bond. In addition, the owner will have control over the property and can increase value in different ways down the road. With a mutual fund, I have no control over the investments in the fund and I won't know for certain how it will continue to perform. Appreciation would be the cherry on top for this property if brought currently and the economic continues to hum. The mutual fund could stay stagnant or go up/down, no one will know. Finally, from a holistic approach, someone buying a $2 million apartment building in cash probably has other investments. Real estate is just one type of investment. He maybe diversifying with a real estate investment and has other security holdings. I once reviewed the financials of a person with a net worth of $700 million. Half was real estate with an LTV of 40%. The other half was in mutual funds and treasury bonds. You may say he should get out of those low yielding treasury bonds and leverage more, but at his net worth, he is in capital preservation mode, not in a capital accumulation mode like us.
With your leverage example, you can get a 3/1 or 5/1 ARM for around 4% with the appropriate down payment. With the value add of increasing rents to market, you'll be able to increase your NOI. If you can increase $200 a unit without additional expenses for 10 units, you'll have an additional $24k in NOI. After stabilization, you can get out of the property at the same cap rate or better and have a nice profit at the end. With this example of $24k increase in NOI, you'll have an increase of equity of $480k assuming a 5% cap rate.
@Johnson H. I never even considered ARM loans. That's why you guys are pros and I'm not. With those types of loans, what happens when the loans get called in 3 to 5 years? I assume these investments are for resale rather long term buy and hold?
Post: Why appreciation matters in the SF/Bay Area

- Real Estate Investor
- Milpitas, CA
- Posts 26
- Votes 19
Thanks, @Account Closed Your input is always fascinating. I'm not doubting your numbers, just playing devils advocate for my own edification. I am trying to separate the cost of homes for use as a primary home (which doesn't have to make sense) versus buying homes for investment. A 10k gross, even if we disregard maintenance and compute 0% vacancy, still doesn't seem to give us the numbers to make the investment worthwhile. A 1.5m loan is unlikely to get us a 3% loan rate even if we somehow manage to convince the lender that it is a primary home.
What I'm getting to is this: why compare a 2m home with a 50k shack? Why not compare a 2m investment here with a high quality 2m investment elsewhere that has a ROI many times the one in the Bay Area, where it's value isn't dependent on appreciation but on cash flow? How do we know that the appreciation is not dependent upon the low interest rate and speculation that is unsustainable? Isn't appreciation based on cash flow the more reliable indicator?
Post: Why appreciation matters in the SF/Bay Area

- Real Estate Investor
- Milpitas, CA
- Posts 26
- Votes 19
This is a fascinating discussion and I'm soaking it all in. However, the business degree side of me is constantly crunching numbers that my brain can't fully comprehend based on the appreciation model.
Isn't the run-up in the Bay Are the result of a confluence of forces: low interest, strong economy with high paying jobs, and cash from foreign investors (Chinese and Indians) and start-up stock option cash outs? Isn't there going to be an end game to this as one, two, or three of these forces end?
Take @Account Closed Example of the Redwood City unit for example. For a 2m property, straight cash is great with gross of 3x1800 + 2500x2 = 10400. What is net after taxes and expenses? Property tax is about 20k. So even if we expect 5% cash on cash return is that the best use of 2m cash when that amount earns more in mutual funds but is truly passive?
Now, if we use leverage, 500k down and 1.5m in loans, at 5% makes it a 8k mortgage not including taxes. If the rates go up 1%, the monthly payment increase 1k to 9k. The historic average for mortgage rates were 7-8%. When that happens, a 25% increase in appreciation, the monthly payment would also increase by 25% assuming the same 5%, or 40% if rates rises to 7%. If mortgage payments go up, sales price must go down right? To me, I just don't see how prices could appreciate indefinitely.
Income does not go up as fast as property appreciation whereas mortgage rates are trending up. Rents are tied to income so can the rent keep up with the property appreciation?
I must be missing something because, ultimately, if REI is an investment and not pure speculation, the numbers have to make sense right?
Post: Evicting renter from a vacation rental property

- Real Estate Investor
- Milpitas, CA
- Posts 26
- Votes 19
Hi Cory,
I have some experience in evicting tenants. Normally, the first notice is a 3-day pay or quit, not 30 day when he failed to pay the rent. At this point, do not collect any rent from the tenant or he would have satisfied the payment portion and you'd be back to square one. I truly hope that it was AirBNB and not the tenant who paid that or it'd be a long protracted battle.
If the tenant knows what he's doing and file a reply through the court system like mine was, you could be looking at 3 months before you can evict. Good luck!
Post: New investor looking for community in San Francisco or Bay Area

- Real Estate Investor
- Milpitas, CA
- Posts 26
- Votes 19
Hi Anja,
I'm a fellow newbie myself and planning to attend the same meeting. Hope to see you there!
Post: California Investor looking to invest out of state but have a problem with DTI

- Real Estate Investor
- Milpitas, CA
- Posts 26
- Votes 19
Originally posted by @J. Martin:
@Brie Schmidt is correct that commercial lenders care more about the cash flow of the subject purchase property, which solves your DTI issue, but presents the next issue of an adequate loan size to be able to find a commercial lender - which she also solved by buying a portfolio. Great job! One good option if you're up for a portfolio you can find. Maybe she can give you some advice on where to start looking if you go that route. I see them from time to time inland in CA from commercial brokers through email, but not as familiar with those markets..
Also, check out this article on a new product Blackstone/B2R is releasing along the lines of what you are looking for, and might be priced more around the 6-7% range.. I don't think they've fully released it yet though..
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-07-07/cerberus-...
Kevin, just in case there was any confusion about the two different references to rent and deposit seasoning..
"ask upfront if using a car loan is a viable source for a down payment. My guess is it's not. A way around that though is to let the funds season before applying for the loan."
It looks like Ali was asking like you were planning on borrowing money on a car loan to put as downpayment on a house.. - rather than just noting that prices of homes in these areas are about the price of a car, or downpayment relative to price of a car..
What Ali meant by seasoning of the funds is that when you get a loan, the source of the downpayment must be sitting in the account for 2 months. Not just deposited in the account. Then you have to jump through hoops to verify where it was from, so just let your funds sit tight.
I believe what Tom meant is that if you buy with cash, after the rents have been in place for a year or two, the rents are "seasoned", and it will be much easier to get a loan based on the value of the property. When he said "hold their own paper" - he's referring to loans that aren't sold/guaranteed to/by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. A lot of times, you can find these loans at community banks or credit unions..
I haven't had the opportunity to work with @Joey Budka yet, but always a pleasure when I see him, and I can vouch for @Account Closed 's knowledge, who vouched for Joey, so thre you go!
Btw, curious if you selected your own tenants, or inherited them on your old property? 8 of the 10 units I've purchased (and now manage) in lower-income areas of the Bay have been vacant, which gave me the opportunity to get them nice, attract, carefully screen, and select the better tenants of the area (or attract even better tenants in), and actively manage w/ very few headaches (w/ some help from my handyman). I will say my single family homes take even less of my time and effort than the apartment buildings, even after adjusting for # of units. Let me know what you think of this 4plex I bought in E Oakland about a month ago. Block is nice, and no one slums around, although International less than a half mile away is pretty ghetto..
http://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/223/topics/132...
Good luck on finding the financing you're looking for! Hope all that helps!
Hi @J Martin,
Thank you for the clarifications. That is very educational and I have much to learn before I pull the trigger on my next investment. Cash up front and refinance down the road may be a path I want to look at.
As for my adventure in landlording, here it is: I selected the unit based on fundamentals, rent income exceeding expense with plenty left over. 3 units were rented, but 1 were not. The unrented unit, we went in and remodeled. We posted it on Craigslist with interior pictures and we had tons of hits and requests. However, the number that actually showed up were less (did they do a drive by and left?) and they were not so enthusiastic once they get there. At first we just didn't get it. Why did we get so much interest initially but hardly anyone followed through?
Well, first, I insisted on credit checks and work history. This is the way it should be done right? My mother, who is a savvy lady (she earned her fortune through real estate without any college education) told me that I can't insist on credit and work history with these kinds of tenants. Oops... mistake #1. I bought a property in an undesirable neighborhood.
Nevertheless, I insisted that we wait for a renter with good qualifications. My old-school mother said just rent it to the first next tenant who wants the unit. She always purchase duplexes and SFH and has never had issue with nightmare tenants (she's lucky). Eventually I relented because how bad could it be? Oops...mistake #2. I got a nightmare tenant. I literally got threatened by them for wanting to inspect the unit, then they stopped paying rent. After three months of eviction process (which they prolonged for as long as possible), we kicked them out.
After 3 years of owner where on paper the rent justified the price but with extraneous costs mounting and rotating tenants, I finally realized I made a huge mistake. No matter how good I spruced up the unit, I am putting lipstick on a pig. I have no control over the neighborhood. It may look like the Playboy Mansion in the inside, but if people fear for their lives, they just won't live there. I put it on sale and sold it with a small gain and called it Landlording/REI university 101 lesson learned. If I consider the time and effort I put into the property based on my work salary, I'd say it's a loss. Lesson #3: I'm a lover, not a fighter. I am not a sweat equity person and would prefer to invest passively, so flipping homes is out of the question (unless it's a no brainer). I'd rather be buying and selling decisions rather than be at the front line. I prefer to have someone manage my property for me in the future.
I'd probably also avoid multi-units because of exactly that, it requires more active management than duplexes and SFR. Good luck with Oakland. You know the area more than I. The only thing I know about Oakland is the war stories my buddy who grew up from Oakland told me about dodging bullets (literally). =)
So why did I stopped investing in REI after that? Well, right before I sold the unit, we lost half our income. No, my wife didn't lose her job but she might as well have. She co-signed for her uncle for a home in Stockton quite a few years back. Everything was fine while prices appreciated but then the crash happened. Asian people cosigned for their family because of family obligations and the knowledge that family won't screw over each other... right? Yeah, about that... his house was underwater and so he decided to walk away from it. It was nice of him to let my wife know ahead of time though. He moved up and left without letting anyone know about it. Apparently he's now ostracized from his extended family but he did it anyway. She had a good cry about it and then we had to make a decision to take over the house or to let her credit go. In the end, we decided to let it go. Continuing to pay for it meant we would be saving the credit of her uncle while taking a loss on the unit all the while the unit would still be under his name and we would have no decision power over it. We let it go and her credit with it.
So we went from a two income with two mortgages but a sustainable DTI to one income, two mortgage over the limit DTI. This is why we've been on the sideline for so long. We just couldn't get conventional loans based on one income with two mortgages. I put our money into the stock market and saw 30% returns on it which is nothing to scoff at. However, seeing how real estate is getting the same gains (in my area) yet people are buying it with 80% leverage makes me wake up at night in a cold sweat. She still has four years left on her foreclosure but we want to get back into REI. However, I wonder if we should wait a little more for the other shoe to drop--interest going back up to normal and depressing home prices even further.
I hope this has not been too winded and TMI.