Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Edward Schenkel

Edward Schenkel has started 7 posts and replied 169 times.

Post: Ask An Attorney Anything About Real Estate Law

Edward SchenkelPosted
  • Attorney
  • New Haven, CT
  • Posts 180
  • Votes 199

ESSENTIAL LEGAL ISSUES IN PURCHASING MULTI-FAMILY INVESTMENT PROPERTIES

Investing in multi-family property is a great way to build wealth. Multi-families are also great first investments for new investors looking to make a smaller purchase to get their feet wet before buying something bigger. However, when buying a multi-family property there are a number of legal issues that every real estate investor should be aware of that do not arise when purchasing a condominium or single-family home. I have outlined three important issues to consider when purchasing a multi-family property.

1.ZONING: IS THE PROPERTY A LEGAL MULTI-FAMILY PROPERTY?

One of the first things I advise clients buying multi-families is that they need to understand whether the property is a legal multi-family. This comes in two forms: it must be either a permitted use under the current zoning regulations or a “legally non-conforming” property. If it is neither, then the purchaser may be in for serious problems down the road. That is why every investor should understand the zoning issues that can arise when purchasing multi-family property and how to navigate through them.

If the multi-family property is a permitted use under the zoning regulations, then you can rest comfortably that the property’s use does not violate the zoning regulations. However, what if the multi-family is in a zone where multi-family property is not a permitted use? Is it an illegal use and therefore a buyer should shy away from the purchase? Not necessarily.

The multi-family property may be a legally non-conforming use. In the world of land use law, a property may not be a permitted use under the current zoning regulations but multi-family may have been a permitted use in the past. A property is considered legally non-conforming if the use complied with the zoning prior to the date that the town changed the zone to remove such use from the zone. For example, if a multi-family was a permitted use in the R2 Zone in 1999 and the town thereafter removed multi-family from the R2 zone, as long as the property was in use as a multi-family prior to the change of zoning it can continue as a multi-family property after the change of zoning as a “legally nonconforming” property.

However, it is possible that an owner illegally converted a property to a multi-family property in a zone that does not permit it. This would mean the property is an illegal multi-family and a property you do not want to purchase. This is why it is important to explore the zoning and the history of the property to make sure you do not purchase an illegal property. As long as the property is in a zone that permits multi-family or the property is legally – nonconforming, you can safely purchase the property. Make sure you ask your attorney these questions during your due diligence. 

2.PROTECT YOURSELF: CREATE A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (LLC) TO LIMIT YOUR LIABILTIY

Buying a multi-family, or any property with tenants, is a transaction that comes with risks and potential exposure to liability that are not inherent in purchasing a residence for you and your family. For example, what if a tenant slips and falls and files a lawsuit against you arguing that her injuries are a result of you failing to comply with your obligations under the lease? What if a tenant accidentally starts a fire that spreads and causes damage to other homes in the surrounding neighborhood? These are examples of the inherent risks in buying multi-family properties. This is why it is imperative to do everything you can to minimize your liability if something goes wrong. One important thing you can do to limit your liability is to create a Limited Liability Company (LLC) and take title in the name of the LLC.

Taking title in the LLC instead of individually will limit your liability to the value of the real estate and will insulate you from personal liability (there are several narrow exceptions to this not discussed in this post). Since the LLC is the owner of the property, any lawsuit concerning the property properly names the company as the defendant and not you individually. Since the LLC's only asset is the real estate, the maximum exposure from any lawsuit is the value of the real estate. In other words, any judgment obtained by a tenant, neighbor, or other potential plaintiff may only look to the company's assets to satisfy the judgment which is the real estate. If the property was owned by you individually, a plaintiff could look to the real estate and other personal assets (bank accounts, other real estate, etc.) to satisfy the judgment.

Setting up the LLC may seem like a simple process but there are various things to consider. For example, if you are creating the LLC with more than one member, you should think about creating an operating agreement which will delineate the authority of each member; whether authority to manage the property will be vested in a manager; the process that more significant decisions are made (for example, will major decisions like whether to sell require a unanimous vote?); the process that the company should utilize in taking on new members; and how the company will decide a tie vote. Drafting a detailed operating agreement will prevent problems between members in the future.

In short, every investor should strongly consider setting up a LLC and taking title in the name of the company to minimize liability. If your LLC has more than one member, creating a detailed operating agreement will prevent problems between the members in the future.

3.TENANTS AND LEASES: DO YOUR DUE DILIGENCE

When buying any property with tenants, it is essential to do your due diligence with respect to the tenants and the leases. As an investor, you want to make sure that the tenants are current on the rent. You do not want to purchase the property only to learn that the tenants are six months behind on the rent and are vigorously fighting an eviction lawsuit. Therefore, it would be prudent to request that the seller sign a document called an estoppel certificate. This document will require the Seller to make a representation that the leases are in full force and effect and that the tenant is current on the rent. This will provide you some assurance that the tenants are not behind on the rent. Moreover, having estoppel certificates signed by the Seller will give you an additional cause of action for misrepresentation if in fact the tenants are not current on the rent.

It is also prudent to review each lease with your attorney. You should be aware of the termination date of each lease and whether the tenant has the option to renew. If the leases are to terminate a month after closing, you should be prepared for the possibility of vacancies. Moreover, if the tenants have an option to renew, this may interfere with plans to lease to other tenants. Similarly, some leases have options to purchase or lease to own arrangements. This type of provision is problematic for any investor as the tenant would have the option to purchase the property after you closed. You would likely not want to move forward with the investment if there was such a provision in any of the leases. This is why it is imperative to review each lease thoroughly to make sure you know what you are getting into.

In summary, it is in your best interest as a real estate investor to carefully review each lease before purchasing an investment property. In addition, having the seller sign estoppel certificates will provide you additional protection in the event the tenants are in fact behind on the rent.

Post: Ask An Attorney Anything About Real Estate Law

Edward SchenkelPosted
  • Attorney
  • New Haven, CT
  • Posts 180
  • Votes 199

Dear BP Community,

There have been many good questions about how to structure your investment portfolio and what type / how many companies you should set up. However, one thing that has not been discussed, but should, is whether to set up an operating agreement for the LLC. If you have a partner, you should consider setting up an operating agreement for each LLC. I will be posting on this topic this week and will include in my post the reasons to have an operating agreement and things you should think about including in the operating agreement.

Post: Ask An Attorney Anything About Real Estate Law

Edward SchenkelPosted
  • Attorney
  • New Haven, CT
  • Posts 180
  • Votes 199

Dear BP Community, 

I have been quite busy with my practice, however I do want to provide a weekly tip tonight. And no, it will not have to do with how to prevent your tenants from slipping on the snow!

This week's tip will have to do with wholesaling, an increasingly hot topic in Connecticut and in other states. It is becoming more and move of an investment vehicle and whether it is a good strategy can be debated, but there are definitely people making good deals from this strategy in my opinion. Here a tip if you are a SELLER entering into a wholesaling contract with a buyer:

Make sure there is a carefully drafted provision providing that says if the buyer does wholesale the contract (assigns the contract to another buyer), and the assignee buyer does not close the deal, then the original buyer must perform and close under the terms of the contract. Essentially, it is a guaranty provision from the original buyer. Therefore, you are protected if the assignee buyer does not perform. If you didn't have a guaranty, and the assignee buyer did not perform, you would not be able to sell your property and would have to sue the assignee buyer or find a new Buyer. Adding a guaranty provision will provide you insurance if the assignee buyer does not close. This is reasonable - you are essentially saying, ok your can wholesale it and try to make a profit, but if it doesn't work out, you have to close. 

Wholesaling can get complicated and a lot of different legal issues can come up, both from a Buyer's perspective and Seller's perspective. Make sure you have the right provisions that account for all of the "what if" scenarios. I will be posting more about wholesaling in weeks to come as I am seeing more and more of this.

Have a great night everyone! And if anyone has any specific questions about wholesaling, feel free to ask here or message me.

Regards,

Ed Schenkel, Esq. 

Post: Connecticut hard money lending guidelines

Edward SchenkelPosted
  • Attorney
  • New Haven, CT
  • Posts 180
  • Votes 199
Originally posted by @Michael Spadaccino:

Thanks for the info 

@Michael Spadaccio:

https://www.cga.ct.gov/current/PUB/chap_673.htm#se...

You will see that CGS 37-4 provides that the max interest rate allowable is 2% but CGS 37-8% provides a number of exemptions, including for a mortgage over $5,000. Therefore, if it is a mortgage of $5,000, there is no max interest rate in CT.

Post: Subleasing A Distressed Property

Edward SchenkelPosted
  • Attorney
  • New Haven, CT
  • Posts 180
  • Votes 199
Originally posted by @Marie Grabo:

Hi, I'm a realtor in CT and am finding a lot of expired listings where the mortgage is much higher than the value so they are either in preforclosure with lis pendens or close to it. In order to skip the short sale process for these homeowners can't i just offer to lease it from them to cover their mortgage payment and then sublease it at market rent value? How would I structure this so it's a win-win for everyone and what is the risk involved? Thanks.

 @Marie Grabo: I would be happy to help. Would you be able to provide me some more information? What is the ultimate goal? For you to sell the property? For you to lease it to a client? What is your ultimate plan to make money on the deal? That would assist me in providing you some guidance. Thanks. 

Post: Finding Investor Friendly Title Companies in Connecticut

Edward SchenkelPosted
  • Attorney
  • New Haven, CT
  • Posts 180
  • Votes 199
Originally posted by @Ryan Herbert:

Can anyone please tell me which title company in Connecticut/ Hartford area that is investor friendly? Thank you

 @Ryan Herbert, I use CATIC (Connecticut Attorneys Title Insurance Company). In my opinion they are the best title company in CT. As mentioned in a previous post, the title insurance company does not handle the closing like in other states. You need to retain an attorney. I would be happy to help you. Message me if you have any questions.

Ed

Post: I am looking for a good lawyer in Connecticut

Edward SchenkelPosted
  • Attorney
  • New Haven, CT
  • Posts 180
  • Votes 199
Originally posted by @Mat O'Grady:

@Edward Schenkel

I am not sure if he works in your area of the state, but Edward has been answering a lot of questions for people on bigger pockets. I haven't used him, but he seems to know what he is talking about and he has a good amount of experience. 

@Kyle Kurt, I would be happy to help you. Please call me with any questions.

@Mat O'Grady, thank you for the kind words. Happy to help.

Post: Ask An Attorney Anything About Real Estate Law

Edward SchenkelPosted
  • Attorney
  • New Haven, CT
  • Posts 180
  • Votes 199

Dear BiggerPockets,

I have had an issue appear over and over that every investor who purchases vacant lots should be aware of. Connecticut municipalities are being proactive in  eliminating non-conforming lots. Therefore, if you own a non-conforming lot (particularly as to minimum area), please pay attention.

Many towns are starting to enact "merger" ordinances which provide that under certain circumstances, two adjacent undersized lots can merge into one larger lot upon its enactment. I have had several clients in the last few years approach me about developing adjoining undersized and they were surprised that they no longer had two lots to develop, and only had one merged lot that they could develop. 

My opinion is that these types of provisions undermine the doctrine of legal nonconformity and I hope that the constitutionality of these types of ordinances are challenged. Maybe I will be the lucky attorney to get to bring this type of case to court. In the meantime, towns are starting to enact them and if you have two adjacent undersized lots, you should be aware whether your town has such a merger ordinance.

There are things you can do to prevent your lots from merging! While these merger ordinances come in different flavors, most of these ordinances provide that in order for merger to occur the lots need to be in the same ownership. Therefore, one thing you can do is put the two lots in two different LLCs to prevent the lots from merging. Of course, this has to be done before the merger ordinance is enacted so it is good to be proactive. There are other things you can do as well to prevent the lots from merging. If you have two undersized adjacent lots, please message me to discuss. I might be able to save you a big headache down the road.

Hope everyone has a nice weekend!

Ed

Post: Ask An Attorney Anything About Real Estate Law

Edward SchenkelPosted
  • Attorney
  • New Haven, CT
  • Posts 180
  • Votes 199
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

@Edward Schenkel Can I accept Bitcoins in the purchase & sale of a $200,000 property?

@Bill T,

Unless your state has prohibited the use of bitcoin, sure. As long as there is "Consideration" for the property, it is a valid transaction. Consideration is a legal term for something exchanged of value. Unless your state has specific laws providing that you can only use cash to purchase property, you can exchange anything of value. As an aside, sometimes property is conveyed to family members for nearly nothing as part of estate planning. This can be considered adequate consideration too in most cases. 

PS. I hope properties do start being sold for bitcoin; I have a small investment portfolio in cryptocurrencies! 

Post: Ask An Attorney Anything About Real Estate Law

Edward SchenkelPosted
  • Attorney
  • New Haven, CT
  • Posts 180
  • Votes 199
Originally posted by @Ian Livaich:

Hi @Edward Schenkel, very helpful information on this thread.  I am graduating from law school in May and will be practicing real estate law for a law firm in Philadelphia, serving mostly large commercial clients.  I plan on investing in real estate in the next year.  I am debating as to whether I will complete the legal work for my properties or not.

I was wondering if you invest in real estate and if you do, do you handle all of the legal work for your properties?  If you don't, is that something you would recommend doing or not?  I can see the advantages of completing your own legal work (familiarity with your business, more attention/time/care, and saving money) but also the disadvantages (spending too much of your time completing legal work, too close/emotionally connected to the business, and not being an expert with residential leases).  I would love to get your thoughts on this.  

Thanks.

 @Ian Livaich, first of all congrats on almost finishing law school. Treat the bar exam seriously and you will pass it.

As to your next question, it is an interesting question. My family has invested in real estate over the years and I have been part of the team. I am just getting into investing on my own now. I will do my best to answer you question. 

First, I think some legal work you may not be permitted to do. For example, if you used a conventional loan from a big bank (e.g. BOA)  and bought a single family home for yourself, the lender may not permit you to represent yourself. The lender may be concerned about the acknowledgement on the mortgage, etc., and may think that if you have to have an attorney or notary take the acknowledgment, you might as well just hire an attorney. Some lenders may just have a policy that its borrowers need to have their own attorney, even if they are an attorney themselves. 

With that said, if you form a LLC with partners and get involved with commercial transactions, I doubt the lenders will care if you represent the LLC. You can add a lot of value by providing your services to your investment team and save your company thousands in legal fees. As Similarly, if you need a permit (e.g. special permit or variance), doing it yourself could also save you and your team some serious money. Leases, evictions, and other litigation are other examples of the stuff you can do by yourself. I personally think you could add a lot of value to a team or save a lot of money by yourself doing this stuff yourself and I plan on doing some of this work myself as well.

The other question is equally relevant - does it make economic sense for you to do the work yourself? Only you can decide this. I think the answer is yes, but if you end up with clients where you can charge a very high hourly rate, it may make more sense to use your time billing those clients and higher another lawyer. 

If I am ever in your area, I will buy you a drink to congratulate on passing the bar!