Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: John Clark

John Clark has started 5 posts and replied 1340 times.

Quote from @Peter Tverdov:

There might be some short term pain on certain materials but long term it will be better IMO.

It was not normal or sustainable for home values to be increasing 10-20% A YEAR in certain metros.

DOGE is a great thing for interest rates because the 10 year is elevated because we have a 2T budget deficit and its not funny anymore. 

They're very focused on trying to get the budget closer to balanced and as they do, the 10 year will drop which means better mortgage rates which is very pro housing growth.

The guy is not stupid no matter what the MSM says about him. Our President is a real estate guy lets not forget that.

"

They're very focused on trying to get the budget closer to balanced and as they do, the 10 year will drop which means better mortgage rates which is very pro housing growth.

The guy is not stupid no matter what the MSM says about him. Our President is a real estate guy lets not forget that."

----------------------------------------------

They're trying to get the budget closer to balance so they can argue for tax cuts for the rich. Remember, the deficit grew more under Trump than it did under Biden.

As for not being stupid, that I grant you. Too bad ignorance is not a function of stupidity.



Quote from @Bruce Woodruff:

 Naw...the new reciprocal Tariffs will force other countries to remove theirs. We will soon be booming.

Not to mention the boost that energy production will cause....

Not just my humble opinion, some pretty big names in the economic field agree.....


 "Naw...the new reciprocal Tariffs will force other countries to remove theirs. We will soon be booming."

-----------------------------------------------------

Too bad history disagrees with you. Look up the effects of the Smoot-Hawley tariffs on the Great Depression.

Quote from @Ken M.:
Quote from @John Clark:
Quote from @Scott Trench:

@Bruce Woodruff

I think this is a good push. I'll give two putbacks to my prior analysis: 

1) The yield curve could invert, and the market brace, for even two years, if Trump credibly brings a candidate for Fed Chair who will lower rates regardless of what inflation data reads, or the markets expect to be extremely dovish. Even if the current Fed keeps raising rates, this will result in the yield curve inverting again, in anticipation of the new Fed Chair changing things. I think that Jay Powell has thoroughly proven that he has no political allegiance, and is singularly focused on attempting to remedy the massive err made in 2021, and that he has, actually, done the least bad job by a central banker in the world from 2022 to 2025 (*hot take!).

2) If Trump removes the threat of tariffs, inflation will stop, and he can do this immediately and at any time.

This only somewhat addresses the points in your take, which I completely respect, but also respectfully disagree with. 

I believe that inflation already picked up on the threat of tariffs, and it immediately changed some firm's behavior in pushing up prices for goods and materials that might be affected. 

I believe that, excluding "immediate deportations" of folks who cross the border and are immediately sent back, that the impact of deportations is small, and is largely isolated to the deportation of convicted criminals in jail or prison in mostly red states. I would be willing to bet on a version of that, and will, in effect, through my real estate purchases this year.

Also - to be clear, I am not arguing that the policies will be "good" or "bad" in a more general sense for Americans. Just that I believe that they tend towards an inflationary effect on non-housing goods and services, and a slightly deflationary effect on housing by reducing demand for housing.

Trump’s economic policies will trigger a deep recession. Prices/rents will go down in real terms, and possibly nominal terms as well.

.
Not likely.
Recession comes from spending money on non income producing items. Trump is trying to cut out some non income producing items so that the money can be used to pay off interest bearing debt and promote growth in the economy. Prices and rents may go up temporarily, but when builders re-enter the marketplace and start building again, inventory will rise and cause pries to drop. 

You can look at the Ford/Carter years to see actual effects of bad policy. I lived through those years and we are nowhere near what it was like then. 

Do keep in mind, that it takes about a year for policies to affect the economy. We will be under Biden's policy effects for another year.

You disregard the suppression of economic activity caused by universal tariffs. Trump will cause a deep recession.
Quote from @Scott Trench:

@Bruce Woodruff

I think this is a good push. I'll give two putbacks to my prior analysis: 

1) The yield curve could invert, and the market brace, for even two years, if Trump credibly brings a candidate for Fed Chair who will lower rates regardless of what inflation data reads, or the markets expect to be extremely dovish. Even if the current Fed keeps raising rates, this will result in the yield curve inverting again, in anticipation of the new Fed Chair changing things. I think that Jay Powell has thoroughly proven that he has no political allegiance, and is singularly focused on attempting to remedy the massive err made in 2021, and that he has, actually, done the least bad job by a central banker in the world from 2022 to 2025 (*hot take!).

2) If Trump removes the threat of tariffs, inflation will stop, and he can do this immediately and at any time.

This only somewhat addresses the points in your take, which I completely respect, but also respectfully disagree with. 

I believe that inflation already picked up on the threat of tariffs, and it immediately changed some firm's behavior in pushing up prices for goods and materials that might be affected. 

I believe that, excluding "immediate deportations" of folks who cross the border and are immediately sent back, that the impact of deportations is small, and is largely isolated to the deportation of convicted criminals in jail or prison in mostly red states. I would be willing to bet on a version of that, and will, in effect, through my real estate purchases this year.

Also - to be clear, I am not arguing that the policies will be "good" or "bad" in a more general sense for Americans. Just that I believe that they tend towards an inflationary effect on non-housing goods and services, and a slightly deflationary effect on housing by reducing demand for housing.

Trump’s economic policies will trigger a deep recession. Prices/rents will go down in real terms, and possibly nominal terms as well.

Quote from @Matt A.:

Its typical for real estate investors to hire a private home/building inspectors to inspect a real estate property before they buy it. There are many licensed inspectors you can hire to do this. 

However, why are there barely any private inspectors who can be hired to inspect construction/remodeling projects being done on properties? 
I assumed having such inspections done during construction/remodeling projects was standard. I'm amazed to find out it is rarely done.  

Or perhaps there is a world of inspectors who do this and I just don't know where to look?
I''ve only heard of ones existing who work on large constructions projects, not small single family home investment properties.

City inspectors will inspect as part of the permit process. So none are needed. If you are doing unpermitted work, it’s either too small a project or you probably don’t want to spend the money.


So the market for such inspectors is probably small.

Post: Commission Fees for Buyer/Seller Agents

John ClarkPosted
  • Posts 1,369
  • Votes 1,099
Quote from @Paul Hurtubise:

@John Clark

Your math is not correct.

2.25 x 2 is 4.5%

I never said it wasn't. I mentioned buyers brokers not showing houses to their clients because they thought the commission split was too low. I think you confused my quoting Brown's posting as my own work.

Post: Commission Fees for Buyer/Seller Agents

John ClarkPosted
  • Posts 1,369
  • Votes 1,099
Quote from @Caleb Brown:
Quote from @John Clark:
Quote from @Caleb Brown:

3K flat fee is reasonable. An agent is going to spend the same time on a 72K listing and a 200K listing. Our brokerage charges $495 to the broker/admin fee. Some agents will do 3% but asking anyone to do 5.5%(2.25 to each side) is not going to be attractive. I would focus on finding an agent that knows what they are doing and will get it sold, not on the cost. 

"Some agents will do 3% but asking anyone to do 5.5%(2.25 to each side) is not going to be attractive."
-----------------------------------------

Which, thanks to brokers fulfilling their fiduciary duties to their clients, would never be a problem, right?

 Duh. I am saying as a listing agent I would not take on a listing at that price point offering 2-2.5%  for a buyers agents on a 72K listing.  Others agents will


 That's perfectly understandable at that price point. One can always refuse the listing.

Problem we get is when buyers brokers won't show because they don't like the commission percentage.

Post: Realtor Selection Question

John ClarkPosted
  • Posts 1,369
  • Votes 1,099
Quote from @Nicholas A.:

So I recently posted about how many realtors to contact and work with. Thank you for everybody thats helped me so far.

I have spoke with about 4 of them.

They all say they will be on the lookout for me, and they are experienced realtors.

I did however get one from here, bigger pockets, and this realtor hasn't worked with investors before, but

is asking me to sign a contract so I am working with them exclusively.

The reason I am asking what to do, is because this realtor with the contract is very new, but I heard that most

realtors will ask you to sign one if theyre serious. Should I keep looking, or try to work with the more experienced ones, or sign with the

newer realtor?


Personally, I'm waiting for the lawsuit by a seller against his own broker for refusing to vet a potential buyer and then show to a qualified buyer. It's a breach of the broker's fiduciary duty to his client (the seller) to bring in as many qualified buyers as possible in order to get the best price possible.

Private agreements by the NAR will be no defense unless in the listing agreement between seller and broker. As for brokers saying "I don't work for free," they'll be paid out of the seller's agreed commission. Also, they won't be representing the buyer, so no drafting contracts or the like, just vetting and showing.

Post: Commission Fees for Buyer/Seller Agents

John ClarkPosted
  • Posts 1,369
  • Votes 1,099
Quote from @Caleb Brown:

3K flat fee is reasonable. An agent is going to spend the same time on a 72K listing and a 200K listing. Our brokerage charges $495 to the broker/admin fee. Some agents will do 3% but asking anyone to do 5.5%(2.25 to each side) is not going to be attractive. I would focus on finding an agent that knows what they are doing and will get it sold, not on the cost. 

"Some agents will do 3% but asking anyone to do 5.5%(2.25 to each side) is not going to be attractive."
-----------------------------------------

Which, thanks to brokers fulfilling their fiduciary duties to their clients, would never be a problem, right?

Post: Investing in south side chicago

John ClarkPosted
  • Posts 1,369
  • Votes 1,099
Quote from @Joseph Alfie:

Hi everyone,

a deal came across my desk. Any feedback on investing in the south side of chicago? is it as bad as we hear it is.

The property is located around Greater Grand Crossing Close to E 71st street and the 94 highway.

Greater Grand Crossing is violent, even by Chicago standards. (eighth most dangerous). Go to a place like West Lawn (NOT Woodlawn), or West Elsdon, if you want South side. Do you really think you have the skills and experience to handle a D (at best) neighborhood? Don't be a fool.