Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Marcos De la Cruz

Marcos De la Cruz has started 18 posts and replied 84 times.

Post: Considering using Hemlane. Which tier?

Marcos De la CruzPosted
  • Investor
  • Huntington Beach, CA
  • Posts 85
  • Votes 32

That's good info. Thanks so much.

Post: Considering using Hemlane. Which tier?

Marcos De la CruzPosted
  • Investor
  • Huntington Beach, CA
  • Posts 85
  • Votes 32

I live in CA and am considering using Hemlane on a fairly new (2023) TX property with few maintenance issues. 

What tier should I use? 

And for older properties (10-15 yrs) do I need the top tier?

Appreciate the help. Thanks.   

Post: Anyone have experience with Rent To Retirement?

Marcos De la CruzPosted
  • Investor
  • Huntington Beach, CA
  • Posts 85
  • Votes 32
Quote from @NA Solla:


Beware of Rent to Retirement and their tactics.


They do not follow through with their commitments, totally mistreat their clients, provide misinformation, and take no responsibility for their actions, or the actuons of their employees.

We lost deals because of their team members not happy with client actions, they failed to divulge pertinent and legally required information, causing delays, very unprofessional.

After which, promises to resolve and terminate the team member that was disrespectful as well as refusing to divulge financial expectations, that could possibly cause further financial losses, and they elected to keep the employee, amd ditch the client. Prior to ditching the client, made promises to remedy by terminating and transferring a deal, that was never transferred, juat to get the client to remove a BBB complaint. They attempted to force and NDA to prevent the client from being able to share experiences, when refused, they tried on multiple times to express that they were losing money because the BBB complaint, never recognizing or accepting that the problem was the cause of their employee, and rather than fulfill their promises, they spent their efforts shifting blame to the client for taking actions, instead of taking action internally with the employee for putting them on the position of losing money, totally ignoring the losses the client was experiencing due to their false promises and failed promises, and intentional inflection of harm. The employee confirmed the order for a purchase was sat on, and in doing so, allowed a deal to move to another buyer, sat on the deal request for 2+ hours, and the deal was snatched up 1.5 hours after, because it was not locked in as requested in writing. I would suggest not working with them, as your likely to deal with the same or similar issues, especially since they allowed the employee to remain and seemingly without any reprimand, and certainly no restitution to the client for the losses caused by Rent To Retirement, and their horrible business practices, and lack of commitment to their clients.

Hope this helps you determine whether to work with them.

Also, o would say, do a search for their name, amd you will find over 100 complaints, I found more, amd in many locations, as well, they have BBB Complaints, and Business license complaints.

Good luck with whatever you do.


 Thanks for the heads up.

Post: LLC : Keep it or lose it?

Marcos De la CruzPosted
  • Investor
  • Huntington Beach, CA
  • Posts 85
  • Votes 32

Thanks for the reply. I do put my SFHs in the same LLC.

Post: LLC : Keep it or lose it?

Marcos De la CruzPosted
  • Investor
  • Huntington Beach, CA
  • Posts 85
  • Votes 32

Anyone have thoughts about whether it's worth keeping LLCs going as an out of state CA investor?

I'm paying $800/yr for each of my LLCs. 

I've read that some investors have never had LLCs.

Post: Paying $800/yr per LLC in CA for out of state rentals

Marcos De la CruzPosted
  • Investor
  • Huntington Beach, CA
  • Posts 85
  • Votes 32
Quote from @Chris Wade:

In 2016, there were two Chief Counsel Rulings by the Franchise Tax Board where they declared, at least in some instances, that business trusts like a Wyoming Statutory Trust, are not considered "corporations" and would therefore not be subject to the minimum franchise tax as defined in CA Rev & Tax Code § 23153. As long as the Wyoming Statutory Trust is taxed as a disregarded entity, it has not triggered the minimum franchise tax for hundreds of our clients who have utilized them successfully. Here is a link to one of the Chief Counsel Rulings 
https://www.ftb.ca.gov/tax-pros/law/chief-counsel-rulings/20...


 Interesting. Thanks.

Post: Paying $800/yr per LLC in CA for out of state rentals

Marcos De la CruzPosted
  • Investor
  • Huntington Beach, CA
  • Posts 85
  • Votes 32
Quote from @Matt Devincenzo:
Quote from @Marcos De la Cruz:

I'll definitely consider it if I can get better insurance, which is ridiculously expensive.

Thanks for your input.

I'd do a search here on BP for LLCs, and you will likely find dozens who have suggested ditching the LLCs. I personally have never used one, and I know many other investors with substantial assets who do not either. My boss' in-laws owned several million in SD real estate and never had any LLCs that I am aware of, and he also owns several properties with no LLC. 

I can think of at least 5-10 regular posters here on BP who have suggested to others that they should just get insurance instead of the LLC route. 

 That's great advice. I'd save $1600/yr without the LLCs. 

Thanks! 

Post: Paying $800/yr per LLC in CA for out of state rentals

Marcos De la CruzPosted
  • Investor
  • Huntington Beach, CA
  • Posts 85
  • Votes 32
Quote from @John Morgan:

California blows in so many ways other than the weather and scenery. We got out of there as soon as we could and moved to Texas. I would ditch the LLCs. Any attorney can pierce them if they really wanted to. Just get extra liability with your insurance and call it good.


 I must say you're the only investor who has suggested ditching the LLCs.

I'll definitely consider it if I can get better insurance, which is ridiculously expensive.

Thanks for your input.

Post: Paying $800/yr per LLC in CA for out of state rentals

Marcos De la CruzPosted
  • Investor
  • Huntington Beach, CA
  • Posts 85
  • Votes 32

Thanks. This seems to be the popular opinion.

Post: Paying $800/yr per LLC in CA for out of state rentals

Marcos De la CruzPosted
  • Investor
  • Huntington Beach, CA
  • Posts 85
  • Votes 32
Quote from @Grant Med:

Hey there!

I am an investor in San Diego and have a few properties in Texas and Louisiana. I can assure you that this is unfortunately not the case. My LLCs are in the states of the properties and California can and DOES tax your world wide wealth. Just make sure you're getting all of the depreciation you can to offset this.

Hope this helps.


 Thanks!

1 2 3 4 5 6