Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Mark Miles

Mark Miles has started 38 posts and replied 498 times.

Post: real estate agent's response to inspection

Mark MilesPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 508
  • Votes 665
Originally posted by @Chris Mason:

@Mark Miles,

Go read up on folks that attempt to sue a seller for "specific performance" (ie, ask a court to order the seller to sell). Make sure you read up on how long it took, how many tens of thousands of dollars in lawyer fees the buyer was out, if they were able to recover those lawyer fees, and ultimately if the court actually forced the sale through or not, and if so under what terms/conditions.  

TLDR: Sure, you have a contract. Great, good for you. In reality, when a seller wants to walk...

Yeah, fair point. I think what annoys me the most is that my agent tends to be very conservative re: bringing up anything with the sellers. Like, any concern I raise (and trust me, I’m not being nitpicky, I have raised very few concerns), he always says the same thing: “Well, we don’t really wanna annoy the sellers by raising concerns to them, but most importantly make sure you get that appraisal done” or “We don’t really wanna annoy the sellers by raising concerns to them, but most importantly make sure you get your insurance lined up.”

It gets annoying to constantly be told (especially as someone who has bought multiple homes before, I’m not a newbie by any stretch) that my concerns aren’t legit & should be ignored but to “make sure I’m progressing things on my end!” I mean, I understand the job from his side of things, but it doesn’t really feel like he’s on my side here, it feels like he’s just in it to get paid (in his defense, he’s quite experienced & one of the top agents in the region, which could be part of the problem, he cares more about being the agent who closed the most deals than about actually helping clients. Perhaps I shouldn’t use one of these “highest sales volume agent in the region” agents any more as high volume is getting in the way of him actually being helpful

Post: real estate agent's response to inspection

Mark MilesPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 508
  • Votes 665
Originally posted by @Mike Cumbie:

Each situation is different. If it is "Fairly substantial" (but obvious) then the offer should have based upon that. Caved in roof and missing back door for example. Well, why in the world didn't you make an offer based on that information when you looked at it. Now say there is a broken truss in the attic and the foundation wall has a structural compromise that a layman wouldn't see. Then renegotiate the offer or walk away.

If it is cosmetic or handyman type stuff, I generally suggest they fix it after ownership because the owner is going to find the cheapest materials and most inexperienced labor to fix it. If they want to go for a credit and it's worth losing the deal over then we go for it. If they say "Well just ask", I make sure they know the seller can walk if they have another offer waiting. If it's worth walking away, then we go for broke and go for whatever we can.

Different strategies for different scenarios

 Thanks! There was one thing you said that I didn't understand:

> If they want to go for a credit and it's worth losing the deal over then we go for it. If they say "Well just ask", I make sure they know the seller can walk if they have another offer waiting.

How can the seller walk away? Once you're under contract with an inspection contingency, only the buyer can walk away. The inspection contingency is unilateral, not bilateral. It gives the buyer the right to walk away if they wish, but the seller is stuck in the deal unless the buyer chooses to walk away. That's the whole point of being "under contract".

In PA, for example, the standard purchase contract states: If no mutually acceptable written agreement is reached, or if Seller fails to respond during the Negotiation Period, Buyer will: (1) Accept the Property, OR (2) Terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller, with all deposit monies returned to Buyer.

This absolutely gives the buyer the right to ask for repairs or credit, and does not permit the seller to walk away and choose another offer. Only the buyer can choose to walk away or not; the seller is stuck in the deal if the buyer remains in the deal, no matter how obnoxious the buyer's demands are. (The seller can, of course, ignore the buyer's demands, but the seller can't terminate the deal just bc the seller has other offers or just bc the buyer is being obnoxious).

Post: real estate agent's response to inspection

Mark MilesPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 508
  • Votes 665

When you're buying a house using an agent, and the purchase contract has an inspection contingency period, and some fairly sizable issues arise during the inspection, does your agent: a) try to convince you these items aren’t a big deal in order to get you to closing ASAP so they can get paid?, b) offer to help you get quotes on fixing these items?, or c) something else?

Post: Poconos - Legalities Investing in Property for Short Term Rentals

Mark MilesPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 508
  • Votes 665

Yeah, it's tough right now - lot of issues going on, regulation and restriction of STR is one of them.

The below thread has basically become the default Poconos thread in this forum with valuable input from multiple experienced investors. be sure to read the thread all the way to the bottom to gain its full value (there’s quite a bit of info in there!):

https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/530/topics/711235-vacation-rentals-in-the-poconos


Post: Conventional mortgage on 3rd short-term rental

Mark MilesPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 508
  • Votes 665

Let's say you already own 2 houses that you use for STR. Has anyone been able to get a conventional mortgage on their 3rd STR house, with the lender accepting the STR income from the first 2 STR houses? If so, what type of conventional mortgage did you get on your 3rd house? Was it a "second home" conventional mortgage or an "investment property" conventional mortgage?

Post: Pennsylvania - Rentals, LLC and Transfer Tax Question

Mark MilesPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 508
  • Votes 665
Originally posted by @Scott Smith:

Hey @Jonathan C.,

I am browsing through the forums and read your post. I am short on time, so I wasn't able to read all the comments - I apologize if I am repeating someone else!

The only way I have seen people protect their properties through an LLC without running into issues with lenders is by using a Land Trust. Other methods can often work, but depending on your lender and type of loan they may execute the Due on Sale Clause. A bank cannot use the Due on Sale Clause when you transfer a property from your own name into a Land Trust because it is considered an inter vivos trust (an estate planning tool) and is excluded thanks to the St Germain Act. So the smoothest way I have seen this work is when someone purchases a property into their personal names, use a warranty deed (a quit claim deed might risk your title insurance) to transfer the property into a Land Trust and then assign the beneficiary of the Land Trust to the LLC.

I am not sure on the transfer tax for PA off the top of my head, but I have helped several clients from the state with this type of transfer. If nobody has adequately answered this question just tag me and next time I hop on I can look up the answer when I have a few minutes.

If you have other questions just tag me or DM me. Best of luck to you moving forward!

This is not legal advice, just my opinion as a real estate investor.

Hey Scott - per your comment above about having helped serveral clients in PA, I'm curious - did all of your clients pay the transfer tax when they transferred title to an LLC? This tax is particularly onerous in Pennsylvania, which charges a transfer tax of 2-4% of the property's value, depending on which PA jurisdiction (I believe this to be one of the heftiest transfer taxes in the nation).

There are a few cases in which you don't need to pay the transfer tax, but transferring title from personal name to LLC is NOT one of those exceptions. According to (c)(1) below, if you were transferring the property into a living trust (per the St Germain Act), the transfer WOULD be exempt from transfer tax IF you were PERSONALLY listed as the beneficiary. If, however, your LLC (which is of course a separate entity from you personally) is the beneficiary (which is what you need in order to gain the desired asset protection), then you must indeed pay the onerous transfer tax:

https://www.pacode.com/secure/data/061/chapter91/s91.156.html

Post: Avoiding transfer tax with transfer to LLC

Mark MilesPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 508
  • Votes 665

I know a lot of people write on here about transferring title to an LLC after closing. I'm curious - is everyone paying the transfer tax when they do this? It's particularly onerous in Pennsylvania, which charges a transfer tax of 2-4% of the property's value, depending on which PA jurisdiction (I believe this to be one of the heftiest transfer taxes in the nation).

There are a few cases in which you don't need to pay the transfer tax, but transferring title from personal name to LLC is NOT one of those exceptions. According to (c)(1) below, if you were transferring the property into a living trust (per the St Germain Act), the transfer WOULD be exempt from transfer tax IF you were PERSONALLY listed as the beneficiary. If, however, your LLC (which is of course a separate entity from you personally) is the beneficiary (which is what you need in order to gain the desired asset protection), then you must indeed pay the transfer tax:

https://www.pacode.com/secure/data/061/chapter91/s91.156.html

Post: pinned threads on top

Mark MilesPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 508
  • Votes 665
Originally posted by @Ken Latchers:
I like others are trying to help  newbies as well as defend them against themselves  and marketers and the clueless types here, but we keep saying the same thing over and over again... Same for the hey, im looking for my first short term rental what should I do?

I don't think it needs a separate Forum, as it is short-term rental. I'm just trying to get them to pin a thread of top were they going to ask questions if we can reply, and if the others are start us read any way we could just say please see the thread on top!

Originally posted by @Eric P.:
Originally posted by @Ken Latchers:

There has been no posts to the evicting renters that is pinned to top for 4 month's. But we get non-stop newbies looking for Arbitrage and non-stop newbies looking for advice to get started.

what if we pinned an Arbitrage/Master Lease thread and a new to short term rental thread on top and unpinned the evicting thread?

it seems we spend endless time wrangling with newbies who think Arbitrage is the way to riches and other newbies who want advice on how to get started. I don't see a lot of people wrangling for how do I evict someone on these discussions

Good point! I've thought about recommending that BP create a separate forum specifically for STR Arbitrage, to keep some of that noise out of this forum.

It seems that STR Arb has now become popular enough (for better or worse) that it's worthy of its own BP forum

We should also have a pinned thread for "new to STR"

Post: LLC Loan with only 10% down?

Mark MilesPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 508
  • Votes 665

When I look at financing options for an LLC, I see that rates tend to be a few percentage points higher. But I also see that LLC loans tend to require 20% or 25% down. Anyone know of LLC lenders (lenders who lend to LLCs) that will accept only 10% down or 15% down?

Post: STR Tenant Verification

Mark MilesPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 508
  • Votes 665

What kind of verifications do you require from your STR tenants before they stay? I'm talking about people who booked via Airbnb, VRBO, etc... Do you request that the tenants send you a copy of their driver's license? Do you request their email address and phone number? Do you require the tenants to sign a separate STR lease even if they booked via Airbnb, VRBO, etc?