Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Matt Mason

Matt Mason has started 4 posts and replied 229 times.

Post: LA, Santa Monica Meetup

Matt MasonPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 231
  • Votes 260

Jeff, thanks for being the MC yesterday. I think it was informative for everyone as well as a good time.

Too bad about the parking ticket. Unfortunately, with LA City, you pretty much have to measure in seconds the amount of time you might go over as they are pretty much there with a stopwatch ready to pounce.

Post: Is real estate syndication going to push out turnkey in the near future?

Matt MasonPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 231
  • Votes 260
Originally posted by @Brian Burke:
Good point, Matt. That's true that investors in 506(c) offerings must be accredited, and to take it one step further, the sponsor is responsible for verifying that the investors are accredited. They can't "self certify" like they can in non-advertised offerings.

It seems as if few syndicators want to bother with certifying accredited investors so many just keep their old model going, especially if they have a good stable of accredited investors ready to invest.

However, I think the crowdfunding sites seem poised to get involved here if rules regarding soliciting non-accredited investors are relaxed. It seems like a golden opportunity given their business model. I think this may be where we see a big change going forward. There is a big difference between someone accredited dropping $50k into a deal vs. a non-accredited investor putting $10k into a deal.

This is where we see some overla that isnt there today, but as others have pointed out good business practices and reputation matter more than anything else in any operator's success.

Post: Is real estate syndication going to push out turnkey in the near future?

Matt MasonPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 231
  • Votes 260

@Chris Clothier

Good points. I suspect that operators who use accurate projections and don't oversell and can retain repeat business and referrals will always have a viable business model in any case.

Post: Is real estate syndication going to push out turnkey in the near future?

Matt MasonPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 231
  • Votes 260
Originally posted by @Brian Burke:
@Matt R. the rule already changed allowing general solicitation for private offerings. I'm doing my first 506(c) offering now, it opened last month. There will likely be additional rules to follow that specify specific additional requirements on how the offering and general solicitations are conducted, but those proposed rules aren't finalized yet.

The rule changed regarding general solicitation of accredited investors. I believe this may include non-accredited investors in some form later this year. At least that seems to be the feeling of some.

Post: Is real estate syndication going to push out turnkey in the near future?

Matt MasonPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 231
  • Votes 260
Originally posted by @David C. d C.:
Originally posted by @Matt Mason:
I'd say REIT investing is as much stock investing as real estate. When one buys in, you are paying what Wall Street values the stock at, which can fluctuate quite a bit.
I once worked for a REIT in a fairly stable sector of real estate tied to long term leases. When I started, the stock price was in the high teens. 6 years later it was up to $100. 3 years later, it was down to below $6!!! 3 years after that it made it back to $60. That is a wild ride.
I agree with @Troy Fisher in that we will probably see some shady syndicators if they are able to really market to everyone.

I agree turnkey won't go away, but was really trying to see if people think that it will face some stiff competition from the SEC rule changes and the rise of crowdfunding.

This is precisely the same 'wild ride' that many SFH buy-and-hold investors went through, if they were highly leveraged, their equity went to zero(or negative), then back up to something again.

Your post implies that real estate is more stable, its not that much more stable when people use leverage as much as they do, its just less liquid so its easier for people to lie to themselves and wait it out.

If you owe 90,000 on an 80,000 house(that you paid 100,000 for), you are at -20,000 in returns and have negative 10,000 equity , but you can point at it and say: I've got an 80,000 house that will probably go back up in value.

When your stock goes from 100 down to 6, you are actually NOT as bad off as the first guy. It just looks worse. As you explained yourself, it went back up to 60, just like the underlying properties have recovered their values.

I don't mean to start a stock vs. RE argument, but there is a false assumption in your post that your real estate equity is 'less volatile'. It probably is if you are un-leveraged, or only slightly leveraged, but that's not what I see advocated for the most part, its 80% leverage or more.

I was implying in the case of the REIT, the stock was more volatile than the value of the underlying real estate in this period. This was partially due to hedge firms taking large short positions during the down draft. Granted, it has been a very volatile period for REITs during this time.

I wasn't implying stocks are always more volatile than real estate in general as this is not necessarily the case as you said, especially if you use 100% financing or a large amount of leverage or invest in a real estate asset class that is more speculative in nature.

Post: Is real estate syndication going to push out turnkey in the near future?

Matt MasonPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 231
  • Votes 260

I'd say REIT investing is as much stock investing as real estate. When one buys in, you are paying what Wall Street values the stock at, which can fluctuate quite a bit.

I once worked for a REIT in a fairly stable sector of real estate tied to long term leases. When I started, the stock price was in the high teens. 6 years later it was up to $100. 3 years later, it was down to below $6!!! 3 years after that it made it back to $60. That is a wild ride.

I agree with @Troy Fisher in that we will probably see some shady syndicators if they are able to really market to everyone.

I agree turnkey won't go away, but was really trying to see if people think that it will face some stiff competition from the SEC rule changes and the rise of crowdfunding.

Post: Is real estate syndication going to push out turnkey in the near future?

Matt MasonPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 231
  • Votes 260

@Jay Hinrichs

Yes, I usually make it down to the Manhattan Beach FIBI every other meeting or so. It is usually very worthwhile. If anything they are getting too big and popular for their venue. I'll look forward to seeing you at the April meeting.

Post: Is real estate syndication going to push out turnkey in the near future?

Matt MasonPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 231
  • Votes 260

@Jay Hinrichs

It seems as if control is a major part of the sell of turnkey. However, to me it doesn't seem to match up well with the actual investment, because one may have control, but it is control of an asset that is underwater so it will need to season for quite a few years in most cases. Also, it is control of an asset that could be thousands of miles away in an unfamiliar market, which seems somewhat less than ideal in terms of management.

Also, I wonder what the exit strategies really are if you have to wait 5-10 years, since it could need another rehab in 10 years. It seems we never hear stories of successful turnkey exits, but I am sure they happen.

I suppose that I tend to prefer investments with high barriers of entry either in location or product type with a value-add component, so it may just be hard to see the real appeal here.

Post: Is real estate syndication going to push out turnkey in the near future?

Matt MasonPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 231
  • Votes 260

@John Rooster not that it really matters to the premise of my post, but the vast majority of people are not full time real estate investors and much of the capital and disposable income in this country is concentrated along the West Coast and Northeast urban centers. Like it not the turnkey question is always popping up on BP, which is what got me thinking about this issue. I am not interested in turnkey as you could tell from my post, but it seems others are and I like to think in terms of business models and future trends just for the heck of it.

You think syndications are being pushed by the syndicators. I think that may be true more in the future if the SEC rules are changed, but as of now, it seems the turnkey operators are much more aggressive in their marketing. In fact if I were to post on BP as John Doe that works at IPO Tech Company in San Jose and think my market is expensive, I am guessing we would see more than a few posts from turnkey sellers.

Post: West LA - Santa Monica Casual Meetup Interest?

Matt MasonPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 231
  • Votes 260

I think that works for me as does during the week. I live a block from Bruhaus or Barfood, so I am biased for those locations.