All Forum Posts by: Matthew Forrest
Matthew Forrest has started 4 posts and replied 256 times.
Post: Build an ADU or subdivide property to build a 2nd home?
- Rental Property Investor
- Torrance, CA
- Posts 263
- Votes 132
I also vote for two homes, and two ADUs!
Post: Los Angeles ADU valuations explained
- Rental Property Investor
- Torrance, CA
- Posts 263
- Votes 132
@Dennis Maynard @Jonathan Taylor
To clarify what I meant by "values will be closer to duplexes minus the financing benefits of duplexes counting the rent as income," I think a SFH with an ADU with be the same from an income perspective to an investor with a duplex (two units only) or someone who wants to house hack and be able to afford more house. Put more simply, right now SFH + ADU is valued more closely to a SFH than to a duplex, but I think it'll move towards the duplex valuation.
Post: Los Angeles ADU valuations explained
- Rental Property Investor
- Torrance, CA
- Posts 263
- Votes 132
@Jonathan Taylor I have had my property appraised twice post ADU (not garage conversion) and the appraisals came in $40,000 apart so the value of the ADU is definitely subjective based on the appraiser that you get. One appraiser compared my property + ADU to a local property + garage workshop. I received $20,000 in valve for the ADU on that appraisal. The second appraiser decided that he couldn't find any good comps, but used his judgement to give valve to the ADU, which resulted in the higher appraisal.
I don't think that ADUs should be valued based on income or square footage, but I believe that ADUs definitely have more valve than they're getting right now. Personally, I haven't seen and SFHs with ADUs sell in my area so I would be interested to see one of those come though. In the long run, the value will be based on comps (assuming we build enough of them) and values will be closer to duplexes minus the financing benefits of duplexes counting the rent as income.
Post: LLC your ADU to Save on Taxes?
- Rental Property Investor
- Torrance, CA
- Posts 263
- Votes 132
@Ray Martinez I do not have any LLCs or other entities and I am able to write off the expenses associated with my real estate expenses.
Post: Gas Connection for ADU in CA?
- Rental Property Investor
- Torrance, CA
- Posts 263
- Votes 132
@Ray Martinez
The biggest knock on electric is probably the stove top, but anyone who prefers gas stove tops probably hasn't tried an induction stove top. Check them out! I vote for all electric for the following reasons:
-Electric appliances and gas appliances are comparable cost wise, If you're building new, you're already installing a new electric drop, meter, panel and wiring throughout the house so incremental circuits should add much cost vs extending your existing gas line and also getting a gas meter
-Electric appliances are more energy efficient (although they can sometimes cost more to operate
-Electric is more safe than gas in the case of an earthquake
-Electric is the future
-CA is planning on phasing out gas
Post: 4-plex analysis in Torrance, CA
- Rental Property Investor
- Torrance, CA
- Posts 263
- Votes 132
@Erik Luna I love Torrance (City of Torrance). Let's connect and talk the market!
As far as your calculation, I think the purchase price is pretty low and that the GRM should be higher. If you already have the property under contract then that's awesome, teach me your ways! It looks like someone bought the property in 2014 and did the value add already so there isn't much room to move rents, which is good from a rent control perspective. Also, I agree with @Richard Weldin, the numbers look good in the calculator, but I don't like the feel off the area. I think City of Torrance is worth the premium and has more upside in terms of appreciation.
Post: REI Meetup at DGHQ - All About ADUs
- Rental Property Investor
- Torrance, CA
- Posts 263
- Votes 132
@Maxwell Ventura Sad that this was too far an I couldn't make it! Have you considered live streaming the event as well?
Post: This is Not the Real Estate Environment for Rookie Investors
- Rental Property Investor
- Torrance, CA
- Posts 263
- Votes 132
Originally posted by @Joseph M.:
@Matthew Forrest - With all due respect, your comment "The government injected trillions on dollars into the economy and those dollars are not just going to disappear. I believe that it will go into the hand of people that value assets who will use their newly found money to buy more assets at whatever the market price is. Money is basically free, asset prices go higher." is dangerous and reminds me of the "Good 'Ole Days" in the early 2000's (circa 2004-2007 mainly). I cannot tell you how many times I was told by bankers, RE "Investors", flippers and brokers that "hey, money is free and the house is an asset and will it will always go up in value. Back then, someone...anyone...could get 90-110% LTV loans. Those were STATED income loans, where little to no proof was needed. Even a "full qual" loan was a cake walk compared to now. I ask ALL those people that took the advise that "money is free and assets will go higher", how did it turn out? Most would say that it wiped them out, some are just recently getting back to square one. The few, that actually had the income/cash reserve to feed the alligator for a long time, at BEST broke even when tax advantages were figured into the calculations.
Here is my take from doing this for 20 years. Money, while cheap now, is never free! There is always a cost, most of the time it is hidden from view. Assets do NOT always go higher. Also, how do define an asset? My definition, for the most part, is something that puts $$$ in my pocket. I say most part because there are exceptions like gold / silver, land banking and development. As I was writing, an investment in RE should put money in your pocket either immediately or in the VERY short term (think buy, rehab and flip/rent). If it does not, you just bough an expensive hobby. Also, always calculate your deal using Before Tax Cash Flow as tax laws change.
As for getting involved now, I think there are deals out there regardless of the economy, interest rates, COVID or even war. It comes down to understanding your market, having a quality team, having a sound financial backing/reserve and not trying to hit a home run every time. Is this current RE environment more difficult? Yes. Should a newbie stay away? No. Should you continue to look at deals, make offers that work for YOU and close if possible? Hell Yes!! Just do so with eyes wide open and, please, move forward at a decent pace. I am writing this from 20 years of experience. While I loved the last RE crash (2007-2010'ish), I personally know of many people and some former friends that got buried. Two of them, including a family member, lost their personal home. ALL of them were of the mind set that "money is cheap/free" and the house is an asset that will "keep going up in value". Learn from their mistakes so you won't repeat them.
Just my 2-centavos!
I'm glad that there are other opinions other there! That's what makes markets and helps prevent bubbles. My statement around money being free was hyperbole and I apologize if that wasn't clear. 2008 was obviously full of bad decision in hindsight, but as you mentioned we plugged some of the gaps that made the situation particularly precarious.
My overall sentiment is not in support of over leveraging! The barriers to entry in real estate are pretty high so reckless speculation is much less common than it is in penny stocks and crpyto. From what I've seen analysis paralysis is a bigger problem for new investors so they don't need to be any more scared than they already are. I believe education mitigates both risk and fear and there is no better way to learn than to do.
Post: Balcony or larger room?
- Rental Property Investor
- Torrance, CA
- Posts 263
- Votes 132
@Shawna Hunter For simplicity's sake I am going to say larger room.
On the other hand balconies are a nice an valuable feature especially in CA. It depends on the size of the room. If its already a sizable room, the balcony. If not, then more space. I lived in a 8x10' room with a balcony, I would have preferred more interior space.
Post: Help deciding what type of tenant to go with
- Rental Property Investor
- Torrance, CA
- Posts 263
- Votes 132
@Jacob Poppe Cool post. I am in my late twenties and own a house with an ADU that I currently live in and rent out (rooms in the main house and the ADU to one guy). I spent my early and mid twenties as the guys renting by the room and was always the guy coordinating people going in and out. With a little bit of bias, I instinctually would say the best option is #1. Its unfortunate to get kicks out of where you live and I doubt those guys will be able to find a place they like as much as yours. At the same time, I assume this option benefits you most as well. As you mentioned, this option would be the least amount of effort. Also, it sounds like this requires zero capex or repairs, which will serve your returns well in the long term as long as you're not allowing unmitigated permanent damage. The only scenario I would go with option #2 is if the repairs & improvements were justified by an increase in rent. Just throwing a number out for paint, floors and AC, to me that sounds like $20,000. Personally I like to see a 20-25% return on that spend, so if you can get an extra $400/mo, I would go for it.
As a side note, if you sign a lease with option #2 or #3, make sure to include some language about your plan to build the ADU. The loss of space as well as the disruption can be difficult to the Tennant when its time to build. Also, unless a paved front yard is the norm for the neighborhood or its impossible for you to attract tenants without providing parking, I wouldn't do it. Paved yards are ugly and might make it even harder to get tenants despite the added parking.
TLDR, thanks for being an awesome landlord. Sounds like you care about the wants of your prospective tenants, but you don't need to sacrifice your financial performance for them. Find tenants that fit your lifestyle and financial goals.



