Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Morgan Chan

Morgan Chan has started 2 posts and replied 4 times.

Post: Trustee sale in los angeles no bid, SB1079

Morgan ChanPosted
  • Arcadia, CA
  • Posts 4
  • Votes 1
Quote from @Jeff S.:

From what you wrote, @Morgan Chan, it looks like the lender’s credit bid was $300K. Thus, the lender got the property back at that price. Your bid would have to exceed $300K.

To be an “Eligible Tenant Buyer” you must occupy the property as your primary residence at the time of the sale, with a proper lease dated before the NOD was recorded, and you cannot be a member of the borrower's family. There are lots more rules and the process is very technical and unyielding.

Consider AB-175 which clarified SB-1079 and significantly tightened it.

Call the trustee that represents the lender and ask them what they require. If they can’t or won’t help, you will have to call a lawyer to help you through the process.

Noted, thanks for the help

Post: Trustee sale in los angeles no bid, SB1079

Morgan ChanPosted
  • Arcadia, CA
  • Posts 4
  • Votes 1

looking to place a bid on a trustee sale in los angeles under the sb10497 law for potential tenant bid. There was a starting amount of 300k, would i need to bid above 300k or any amount over $1 since it has no bid?

Post: Subordination agreement with 2 loan

Morgan ChanPosted
  • Arcadia, CA
  • Posts 4
  • Votes 1
Quote from @Chris Seveney:
Quote from @Morgan Chan:

i am looking into going into a trustee sale on deed of trust for $300,000 by evergreen "second lien holder" but after getting a title report i see there are a Subordination agreement between CTBC "first lien holder" and evergreen. If i purchase the lien on evergreen would CTBC debt be wipe out or i will be on hook for the first lien as well? Also, there is unpaid property tax as well, will the property tax be written off or which party will be responsible for it?

thanks,

morgan

Based on what you wrote, if you purchase the lien from evergreen, you will be in first position. CTBC debt is only wiped out in a foreclosure where the proceeds do not cover their loan amount, that loan is still valid. 

For property taxes, they can foreclose on the property as well and the taxes would be superior to any and all mortgages. 

I have also been involved in litigation on subordination agreements where they are disputed. I would recommend their be title policy involved as thankfully mine had a title policy and the cost to litigate is well into the six figures. 


 thank you for the thoughtful answer, if ctbc loan is still valid would the inital loan guarantor or myself would be accountable?

thanks,

morgan

Post: Subordination agreement with 2 loan

Morgan ChanPosted
  • Arcadia, CA
  • Posts 4
  • Votes 1

i am looking into going into a trustee sale on deed of trust for $300,000 by evergreen "second lien holder" but after getting a title report i see there are a Subordination agreement between CTBC "first lien holder" and evergreen. If i purchase the lien on evergreen would CTBC debt be wipe out or i will be on hook for the first lien as well? Also, there is unpaid property tax as well, will the property tax be written off or which party will be responsible for it?

thanks,

morgan