Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Nina Grayson

Nina Grayson has started 6 posts and replied 60 times.

Post: Owner-Occupied 3-Partner Investment Scenario - Any Thoughts?

Nina GraysonPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 67
  • Votes 53
Originally posted by @Manolo D.:

Nina Grayson Well, that’s the normal sharing, what if market dips, so the 1,000k (for simple computation, instead of 1,200k) one owns 10% and others 50% and another 40%. Now the property at year 1 is at 900k and 50% wants out, it will be a breach of contract but he doesn’t care, he wants out, he thinks at year 3, the property will be worth 750k. What will you do? I’ve tried structuring even just 2 parties, and i couldn’t even cover all the what ifs, i was on page 15 with a single space font 10 contract and i think I covered 30-40% on what I should cover. make 3k of 300k is already a bit scary itself. Good luck though.

 Thanks @Manolo D. ,  These partners wanted a Multi-Fam, but I think they are better off doing a Fix & Flip.  As passive investors, I think it's less of risk to depend on the market from 1-3 yrs. for a modest return when they have enough to flip a property in 6-8 months for a much higher return.  Thanks, NG

Post: Owner-Occupied 3-Partner Investment Scenario - Any Thoughts?

Nina GraysonPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 67
  • Votes 53
Originally posted by @Manolo D.:

Nina Grayson Looks scary. I guess you need to do what you need to do. I won’t do it though. Anything goes wrong or anyone wants to bail, cover what happens, who can buy-out who and for how much. Why do you need the P1 again? Seems like 200k will be enough for a 20% dp.

Thanks @Manolo D. 

It is scary, right?  Yes, $200k is enough for a 20% dp, but I was trying to increase the income to make it more attractive.  Also, this would allow all parties to get in on the deal.  As for the "what ifs," there is a contingency in place.  Three year commitment.  And when someone want's out, the equity share is calculated based on the % of initial investment.  So if one goes in at 8% and the others go in at 46% each of the total down, and the 8% party wants out in three years, each initial investment is amortized over the three years to determine each parties equity.  But yeah, it's scary.  

Thanks, 

Nina

Post: Owner-Occupied 3-Partner Investment Scenario - Any Thoughts?

Nina GraysonPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 67
  • Votes 53

I have two investor partners  who want to do a deal that includes one partner owner-occupying a unit.  Do you think this structure is a good deal?

Location:  Los Angeles County

Partner 1 (P1)

- P1 wants to owner-occupy with family of four (spouse and two children)

- Prequaled self (not including spouse) for $435k.  Lender ran numbers assuming a duplex, with 2nd unit as income.   

- Down $80k

- $435k would only get P1 properties in South LA, which does not meet P1 standard of living, so P1 decided to get one or two more partners to increase buying power for a better location.  

Partner 2 (P2)

- P2 is an Agent and will use commission as carry 

- Maximum purchase price $1.2 mil.

- Comm. is approx. $20k. 

Partner 3 (P3)

- P3 will take out up to $200k from equity in SFR for down

Partners will form an LLC for the purchase

-6 plex, Two 2Br, Four 1Br

- Total Down = $300k (25%)

- Loan Amt. = $900k

-Terms = 30 year, 4.5%

- Monthly payment = $5600

- Monthly Expenses = $1000

- Rents = $9600

Post: Financing-FHA Approved. How do I use this with others' money?

Nina GraysonPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 67
  • Votes 53

Thanks @ Aikane Belez. Yes, I know FHA is only for owner-occupied. I was looking at FHA as an option if I or another investor lived in the property - say a duplex. Yeah, FHA's are unlikely at $150k, and that price is most likely a tear-down or like I said, in the Valley (and Lancaster is so far away from LA proper, it would be a challenge to find renters). I had not thought of doing an off-market deal and using my comm. as part of my carry. I'll have to run some comps for projected comm. and performance on Income properties to see how the numbers look. Thanks!

Post: Best Online Realtor License School in California

Nina GraysonPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 67
  • Votes 53

https://licensesolution.com/california-real-estate...

They have 3 packages, $99, $149, $199.  

Their courses are self-paced and have online Chapter Quizes, course exams require a 60% pass, and after you pass you get your Certificate.  They also have a State simulated exam.  You can get the books in PDF or print.  And if you need more help in preparing for the exam, check out www.prepagent.com.  They will prepare you for everything you need to know to pass the exam.  

Post: Benefit to seller if buyer uses cash vs conventional financing?

Nina GraysonPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 67
  • Votes 53

I had a good cash buyer deal.  

After offer, they put down $3000 earnest, the offer was only on the table for 20 days, after inspection, I dropped the price by only $5000 due the cumulative repairs needed, and I got them to pay some of those escrow fees.  

And I'm not opposed to keeping the earnest money if they try to milk the contingency.  They made a cash offer, if they cannot stand by it, there are consequences.  

Post: Financing-FHA Approved. How do I use this with others' money?

Nina GraysonPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 67
  • Votes 53

David, 

This is a program through LA County that provides a $60k down payment grant. They limit the DTI. I have money for a down, and a great credit score. They just limit the amount if you are only putting down 1% earnest and using the grant.

My intent is not to make a financial partner a guinea pig. I only will go into vehicles that have Market and Rent analysis that shows a strong ROI.

It is my understanding that investing with low or no money down is achieved with partners who have the funds but do not have time to do the leg work of finding the deals. I was simply seeing if I could bring something to the table with an FHA. Apparently, using an FHA with partners is not possible.

It is possible to by a property in LA County for $150k or less.  However, you have to go East or North into the Valley. Although, there are not many duplexes or in-law properties in those areas that I've seen in that price range.  I'll have to bring cash to the table and do an Limited Partnership commercial loan with partners.

Post: Financing-FHA Approved. How do I use this with others' money?

Nina GraysonPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 67
  • Votes 53

Thanks Bob.

I thought it was the LLC commercial mortgage, but was not sure.

So (in very basic steps) I would have to:

1. Bring in partners

2. Form an LLC

3. LLC puts down 25% (partner funds)

4. LLC commercial loan approval

If some of the partners do not have cash to contribute to the 25%, but lets say they do some of the leg work, is it a normal practice to obtain the down from Hard Money Lenders or is it best to have some partners put the 25% down?

Post: Benefit to seller if buyer uses cash vs conventional financing?

Nina GraysonPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 67
  • Votes 53

Hey Josh, 

I'm a newbie too, but I sold my home in less than thirty days because I got a cash offer for not much less than my listing price.  The benefits to me as the seller:

1. Faster sale, less paperwork

2. Less risk - cash buyers have the funds and can provide a higher earnest money deposit, borrower's might lose funding and cancel

3.  Leverage - My RE Agent and I tried to leverage the cash offer and counter other buyer offers who were using loans.  It can work if someone really wants the house, but the other offers had a threshold, so the cash offer stood

4.  Desire - Cash buyers see great value in the property and want it, so they will make a cash offer to overcome any pending or future offers

There are other benefits, but these were the most relevant in my experience. 

Post: Financing-FHA Approved. How do I use this with others' money?

Nina GraysonPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 67
  • Votes 53

As I have been educating myself on REI, I wanted to know how much of a mortgage loan I could get approved for right now on my own. With one lender I was approved for $150k at 4.5%. I know it's peanuts for the CA market, but it gave me an idea of what I can get solely on my own. Of course, I want to invest and I need a bit more to get into a 4 plex or more. So I need others' money to do it. My question is, can I use the individual loan and get others to bring in their funds and have it all under my name or should we get the loan under an LLC? I'm not sure how my own loan approval would work with adding others' money to the mix. Thanks for clarifying this for me...