@Breelon Bryant i had a long message typed that got deleted, so let me try it again a little more concise. It’s doable with considerations depending on the initial funding:
1. Conventional loan-a pro and con is that you need an appraisal up front. Pro because you go in with confirmation of initial value (helpful if you aren't confident in calculating ARV) but con because it has to be in sufficient condition to appraise (no full rehabs, which can limit upside). You also have pros and cons in cost-you have to pay closing costs twice, but your rate is far lower than short term money so holding costs are lower. Final consideration is that you must come up with all down payment $$, it cannot be borrowed. Ultimately it's definitely doable, I'm doing this on one of my properties. But know the pros and cons
2. FHA loan-all the same considerations of conventional with 3 additions. The biggest factor is that you must now live in the property for a year (not a lawyer, close enough for my use but I'm not a lawyer). Additionally, in the higher LTV and PMI into your holding costs, which is still likely cheaper than short term money. Finally, you'll need more meat on the bone to make a refi worthwhile compared to a conventional because you can only refi into a conventional loan, meaning you must leave 25% in (could be slightly more or less depending on the lender, but that's normal). Quick example on a not perfect BRRRR-Bob and Joe both buy a house for $60k, spend $30k on rehab, and expect an ARV of $120k. Bob uses conventional funding, Joe uses FHA. They get a bad appraisal (and don't dispute it) and the house only appraised for $90, meaning they can both only pull out $67.5k. Bob put down 20% so he's still going to pull out $19.5k. Joe only put down 3.5% meaning he'd only pull out $9.6k. Closing costs on the refi are around $3k, at which point it's probably not worth it for Joe to effectively pay 50% to pull out $6k. This is a weird example and situation, but it's more about understanding the nuance and psychology of it
3. Commercial loan-these are more expensive but more flexible. With conventional loans you need to pay the down payment out of pocket, but depending on the commercial loan you don't. It can come from a line of credit, a partner, or borrowed funds. This potentially allows you to truly get into a deal with no money. Main considerations are that you'll likely need to borrow under an LLC, rates are variable and may be higher, and the amortization period is usually only 15-20 years instead of the standard 30 which means higher monthly payments. Additionally commercial appraisals are generally more expensive (although some will let you finance the closing costs), they take longer to close, and banks may be more selective on what types of properties they lend on. But they can offer flexibility that the first two options cannot. I'm currently in the process of doing a BRRRR with one of these as well
That wasn’t as short and succinct as I planned but I hope that helps. Reach out with any questions