Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Turgut Oz

Turgut Oz has started 7 posts and replied 34 times.

Quote from @Allan C.:

while I agree impounds are good for lenders to reduce defaults, they are horrible for responsible borrowers. If I have 6 figures of taxes and insurance escrowed at 0% interest I am losing $20k+ of interest income.... and even worse opportunity cost is even more. 


 That is WHY they fight to retain it so hard...

Quote from @JD Martin:

Most people would be in doomsday scenario if escrow were removed, because a significant portion of buyers would not be disciplined enough to set aside the funds themselves for payment and would then be in tax or insurance default. Your partner (the bank) knows this, which is why they're not crazy about the idea.

That said, I agree with you about removing escrow if you're the type that knows what you are doing and always keeps sufficient reserves (I don't really get the redeploying the capital other than keeping it somewhere safe and liquid, since you'll need it every year like clockwork). I hate escrow for 3 personal reasons:

1. I have had two different instances in the past where my lender failed to pay property tax and insurance. In both cases I had to pay out of pocket until it was resolved. Both were eventually resolved but at great time & aggravation to me.

2. I do not trust the record keeping of lenders. I had a loan once sold 3 times in 2 years, and the last buyer suddenly insisted I had a $25 late fee on my account for some mystery late payment from years earlier from one of the previous note holders. When I inquired which lender & which payment (I keep records on everything), they couldn't identify it, only told me that I'd keep getting the notice it was on my account until I paid it. Coda: I told them they could kick rocks unless they identified what payment & lender it was, and that they could send me letters until I was dead and I'd sooner set $25 on fire in the middle of the lawn first. After 2 years of sending the monthly letter (they probably spent more on letters than $25), I suddenly got a letter one day that because of my excellent payment record they were granting me a courtesy convenience waiver of the fee.

3. I like paying my insurance and taxes depending on when I need deductions. Sometimes I pay just before the end of the year, other times I will pay just the minimum on insurance and/or taxes before our 2/28 deadline depending on where I am with write-offs. I don't get that luxury with escrow. 

A similar thing happened to me as well. I spent hours with their customer service (most are off-shore by the way) to get the accounting done right. I think there has been a lot of companies popping up recent years calling themselves "XYZ Capital" and get into the industry without proper support for their customers. That is a another problem though. 
Quote from @Stetson Oates:

Personally I think it’s one of the largest injustices done to the American homeowner. Imagine the amount of purchasing power taken out of the economy at any given time so insurance companies and banks can lower risk for themselves.  Granted it all gets paid (or should get paid) in the end but I’d rather have control of my cash vs paying it in escrow.  I’ve always thought this is an overlooked issue that banks and insurance companies have gotten away with.


 Totally agree. They want to keep it for the same reasons, we, homeowners want to keep it. I am ok with this until certain equity but it seems like they want to hold on to it forever!

Quote from @Katie Smith:

Totally understand your frustration, and it’s great to hear you’ve been so consistent with your payments and maintaining a strong equity position.

From a lender's standpoint, even when a borrower meets general eligibility criteria (like a strong payment history and low LTV), the ability to remove an escrow account isn't always at the lender's discretion alone. In many cases, it depends on who owns the loan—such as Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or a private investor. Each has its own servicing guidelines that the lender or servicer must follow, and sometimes those guidelines restrict escrow waivers regardless of borrower performance.

Since you're in Texas, it's also worth noting that certain state-specific regulations or risk factors related to property taxes and insurance premiums can come into play, and some investors see escrow as a way to protect the asset and ensure those payments are made on time.


 Thanks for the response. I wish they provided better answers so I'd know what exactly they are concerned with. 

Quote from @Gustavo Delgado:

That's unfortunate to hear that they will not work with you even as you are up to date and not late on payments. I have a loan with Chase and they removed the escrow after about 2 years at my request with no fuss. I too would rather keep that money and pay it later


 Yes, that is what I do with all my loans and deploy those funds elsewhere until payment time comes in. 

Quote from @Chris Seveney:
Quote from @Turgut Oz:

I have a conventional 30 yr mortgage for 3 years. I have always paid on time and recently canceled PMI so there is no PMI right now. I have a LTV <0.8. The lender said the investor (in my loan) has refused to remove my escrow account. But, there is no reason why lender insists on that when I have above parameters. The lender does not provide any reason as to why lender refuses it or what factor prevents them from doing so. I am in TX. I wrote a complaint on CFPB. What are my options?


PMI and Escrow are two totally different things. Most loan documents require the property to be escrowed for taxes and insurance as that protects the lender to make sure they are being paid. The default rates on taxes and insurance I would bet are 10 fold compared to loans who have escrow because people live paycheck to paycheck and then when a big bill comes due they cannot pay it.

I would guess your loan documents require it

BTW why are you putting up a big fuss on having the servicer hold taxes and insurance escrow?

Is that a real question? Let me ask you this. Why would I not want to keep my own funds in my own control and use it how I want? 

I have a conventional 30 yr mortgage for 3 years. I have always paid on time and recently canceled PMI so there is no PMI right now. I have a LTV <0.8. The lender said the investor (in my loan) has refused to remove my escrow account. But, there is no reason why lender insists on that when I have above parameters. The lender does not provide any reason as to why lender refuses it or what factor prevents them from doing so. I am in TX. I wrote a complaint on CFPB. What are my options?

Quote from @Jas Singh:
Quote from @Turgut Oz:
Quote from @Jackie Linne:
Quote from @Turgut Oz:

I have talked with two different attorneys. I got opposing opinions on below and wanted to get what others know (or do) on the subject. Please note that this is for a Texas Series LLC.

1. Imagine you have a Texas Series LLC (parent) with five cells in it (children). Does each of these cell need a separate checking account for a reasonably good asset protection? One attorney said it is a must, whereas other said confidently that it is completely unnecessary. He did not oppose to it, he just thinks only the parent series LLC having one account is enough.

2. I inquired about the possibility of a two-company structure: 

A traditional LLC that is the public face of the activities (collecting rents, paying contractors, etc.) and managing the Series LLC with each property in once cell in it (in this case, Series LLC is serving as a holding role).

Again, one attorney said that would be much better than a standalone LLC and that is recommended approach, and the other said it is waste of time and money since there are some requirements from Texas Real Estate Commission, which is requiring being a licensed broker in the state to operate in the managing LLC.

So, just want to hear what other Texas investors are doing when it comes to series LLCs regarding these issues. 


Thanks

Hi there. I'm also trying to figure out the best way to structure my series llc (in Ohio) and I'm getting both perspectives.  I'm leaning towards separate bank accounts to be safe. Question for you: are getting a separate EIN for each of your series?

I have set up a Series LLC in TX. I decided to go with one bank account for the parent LLC. In Texas, if transactions are reasonably distinguished among child cells, one does not need separate bank accounts per a few attorneys' advice. I have only one EIN for the parent LLC.

Hey Turgut,
If you don't mind DM'ing what bank you used. I checked online and generally folks say Bank of Texas or local credit unions.
Thanks!
I used Chase for a Business account. They give you a credit card and you can use Zelle with LLC. However, I am not transitioning to Baselane to streamline each property's expenses. Seems promising right now but I can share more as I experience it.
Quote from @Jackie Linne:
Quote from @Turgut Oz:

I have talked with two different attorneys. I got opposing opinions on below and wanted to get what others know (or do) on the subject. Please note that this is for a Texas Series LLC.

1. Imagine you have a Texas Series LLC (parent) with five cells in it (children). Does each of these cell need a separate checking account for a reasonably good asset protection? One attorney said it is a must, whereas other said confidently that it is completely unnecessary. He did not oppose to it, he just thinks only the parent series LLC having one account is enough.

2. I inquired about the possibility of a two-company structure: 

A traditional LLC that is the public face of the activities (collecting rents, paying contractors, etc.) and managing the Series LLC with each property in once cell in it (in this case, Series LLC is serving as a holding role).

Again, one attorney said that would be much better than a standalone LLC and that is recommended approach, and the other said it is waste of time and money since there are some requirements from Texas Real Estate Commission, which is requiring being a licensed broker in the state to operate in the managing LLC.

So, just want to hear what other Texas investors are doing when it comes to series LLCs regarding these issues. 


Thanks

Hi there. I'm also trying to figure out the best way to structure my series llc (in Ohio) and I'm getting both perspectives.  I'm leaning towards separate bank accounts to be safe. Question for you: are getting a separate EIN for each of your series?

I have set up a Series LLC in TX. I decided to go with one bank account for the parent LLC. In Texas, if transactions are reasonably distinguished among child cells, one does not need separate bank accounts per a few attorneys' advice. I have only one EIN for the parent LLC.

Post: My 100k house vs 100k in the S&P 500 (16 years later)

Turgut OzPosted
  • Investor
  • Dallas, TX
  • Posts 35
  • Votes 16

One thing for sure, most self-proclaimed gurus or REI 'influencers' do not mention the things you clarified above. For most people, even your example is not even possible in this day (finding 1% rule that is a turnkey for example) to come across. Also, a single capital expense (roof repair, plumbing etc) can wipe away years of cash-flow (if you had cash-flow btw). So imagine the losses on a home that is break-even or negative cash-flow situation plus the mental drain for repairs, communicating with tenants (or PMs--they also bring different kinds of problems). Therefore, if a property does not have the potential of appreciating significantly, investing for cash-flow is not the wisest approach in my opinion. But a property purchased with right price from the right location with a good leverage can be a great wealth builder.