Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Shiva Bhaskar

Shiva Bhaskar has started 53 posts and replied 506 times.

Post: Using a Property Manager - bad idea?

Shiva BhaskarPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 523
  • Votes 475

I think starting out (I am newer myself), you should self manage. After you hit several properties, and are looking outside of your local market, you'll probably have to hire people. At that point, use investor referrals (you'll do plenty of networking wherever you invest, and will hear some names again and again), to find someone. I've had great luck with that approach to find contractors and realtors etc. If you keep hearing a market doesn't have any or many good managers, maybe that's a sign it's a place to be careful of. But yeah, I think your grandfather is basically right about this - early on, avoid a PM. 

Post: When is enough enough? How many homes does one need!?

Shiva BhaskarPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 523
  • Votes 475

This is a very interesting question. I think David raised an important question.

As far as Invitation Homes and others, I suppose this is the nature of capitalism. If a company can grow and earn more, and has outside investors backing it, it has an obligation to do so. Obviously, there are limits to how one can go about this, but that's the mandate, in a sense.

But as to your question about families owning four properties each: The number of people who want to be landlords and are as crazy as we are to love this stuff, is relatively small. I am an attorney myself, and have plenty of friends and family, in my profession, as well as doctors, dentists etc. The number of these highly paid, educated folks who have the willingness to invest and spend time on real estate, is very small. They think it's not worth the trouble, they don't have the interest or confidence, tons of reasons.  Same is true with lots of professionals, people who have the means to invest pretty well. 

Also, I think when it comes to scaling up, everyone has their own desires. I'd like to own several hundred doors at least within the next few decades, because I enjoy the challenge of finding and putting together a deal, making things work, and yes, because of the money. I'm also very into charitable and non profit work, and would love to put my money towards helping people and supporting things I care about. There are huge landlords who donate millions of dollars to help institutions they care about, in fact, I'd venture to say most of the rich folks give quite a bit charitably.

But I also know other folks who want a few properties to retire with, or simply to quite their job and live well off rental income and maybe something else....there are tons of personal preferences and goals, and I don't think any are right or wrong. I have a friend whose dad owns quite a few properties (at least several million a year in rental income, probably more), and could buy plenty more, but would rather travel and spend time with his grand kids. I'm sure some of his peers who are still out there chasing deals think he's crazy, but hey, it works for him. They are individual choices, and we have to  make the right choices for ourselves and our families, by being self aware. 

Post: Single vs. Multi-family

Shiva BhaskarPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 523
  • Votes 475
Originally posted by @Clarence Johnson:
I personally love 90047, not the whole zip, but certain pockets that are Inglewood adjacent are great.  This area also has non-rent control pockets of multifamily properties which is very rare for LA.  I always suggest starting with multifamily, due to it being easy to later purchase a SFR using FHA or low down payment conventional options.  If your first purchase is a single family, it eliminates your low down payment (3.5%) options for a multifamily property and you will need 20-25% to make it happen.  I live in Inglewood and can throw a rock and hit 90047, there is value there and my favorite pockets are within 2 miles of the Inglewood stadium development.


Originally posted by @Shiva Bhaskar:
Originally posted by @Andrew Lawlor:

@Shiva Bhaskar and @Nabil Suleiman Thanks for your insight. Are there certain areas in LA that you consider more risk-averse than others? I recall listening to a BP podcast where one of the guests recommended avoiding high-crime areas at all costs. Considering capital plays a significant role, would you avoid these areas? 

 I don't think there are as many areas in LA that I worry about for the crime issues, as in, say, St. Louis or Memphis or Cleveland. I would avoid buying headaches, which includes, yes, warzones. The only areas I'd really avoid in LA are the Westmont area of South LA (90047), and also the areas a bit north (up to Slauson), and say a mile or maybe two west or east of the 110 freeway. 

A lot of historically bad areas like Compton and Watts have really calmed down and are seeing major appreciation (Watts has been crazy for that the last two or three years), and there can be good opportunities. Inglewood and Hawthorne were never great until relatively recently, and are now hot markets. Depends on what your capital situation is, but I think outside of the area I mentioned above, you can avoid crime as a major issue in much of LA. But, if you really want to avoid risks, West LA, most of the Valley, and the beach cities, are all low crime areas. 

However, if you decide to look out of state, or even in California cities like Oakland or Stockton or San Bernardino, you'll need to think carefully about crime. It is a real issue in those cities, more than in LA. 

 Clarence, thanks for sharing. I have seen that there are some non rent controlled properties. I agree with you that the part right by Inglewood is good - I have also seen closer to the 110, on the other end of that zip code (i.e. past Normandie towards Vermont), and I think that section can be rougher, but as we know, people are making money everywhere - I'm sure it'll continue to improve in the future. Either way, Inglewood is absolutely on fire right now - I'll always wish I had gotten in there four or five years ago, but I think there's still plenty of upside in the long term if we invest now. 

Post: Thinking of Doing a 1031 on two SFRs to Multi-Family

Shiva BhaskarPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 523
  • Votes 475
Originally posted by @Charles Chang:
Originally posted by @Nabil Suleiman:

@Charles Chang

I still know lots of people that continue to invest in CA too. It really depends on you and what you want/ feel comfortable with. 

For me to invest in California, it's gotta be a lot better than the 3.2 cap rate I am getting on my current properties right now.  Otherwise, it wouldn't be worth the trouble to do a 1031. My minimum expectation is a 5 cap rate.

Hi Charles, I'm an LA guy like yourself (South Bay), and also hoping to move from SFR to multifamily. I actually think Sacramento has good growth potential for the future, especially with lots of SF folks relocating closer to there, and job growth within the city itself. Fresno obviously is a play a lot of people like, but I"ve been hearing about Stockton as well. The city has been through hell (crime, bankruptcy etc), but you are seeing folks from elsewhere in CA moving there, and it seems like things have improved somewhat economically. If cash flow is what you want, worth a look IMHO.

Post: Single vs. Multi-family

Shiva BhaskarPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 523
  • Votes 475
Originally posted by @Andrew Lawlor:

@Shiva Bhaskar and @Nabil Suleiman Thanks for your insight. Are there certain areas in LA that you consider more risk-averse than others? I recall listening to a BP podcast where one of the guests recommended avoiding high-crime areas at all costs. Considering capital plays a significant role, would you avoid these areas? 

 I don't think there are as many areas in LA that I worry about for the crime issues, as in, say, St. Louis or Memphis or Cleveland. I would avoid buying headaches, which includes, yes, warzones. The only areas I'd really avoid in LA are the Westmont area of South LA (90047), and also the areas a bit north (up to Slauson), and say a mile or maybe two west or east of the 110 freeway. 

A lot of historically bad areas like Compton and Watts have really calmed down and are seeing major appreciation (Watts has been crazy for that the last two or three years), and there can be good opportunities. Inglewood and Hawthorne were never great until relatively recently, and are now hot markets. Depends on what your capital situation is, but I think outside of the area I mentioned above, you can avoid crime as a major issue in much of LA. But, if you really want to avoid risks, West LA, most of the Valley, and the beach cities, are all low crime areas. 

However, if you decide to look out of state, or even in California cities like Oakland or Stockton or San Bernardino, you'll need to think carefully about crime. It is a real issue in those cities, more than in LA. 

Inform the tenant that he was required to disclose this to you immediately, and he needs to get the dogs out of there. If that is not done ASAP, start eviction proceedings. I'm a huge dog lover, including pit bulls, but this is putting your property and other tenants at risk, not to mention, it might violate your insurance policy. 

Post: Interested in a meetup for South Bay investors?

Shiva BhaskarPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 523
  • Votes 475

Hello friends,

There seems to be interest in the South Bay amongst folks here on BP (and for good reason, I think it's one of the most exciting sub markets in the LA area). As a native of the area who moved away to the East Coast for along time, and now being back, I'm very excited to see what is happening, and have a chance to be part of it. 

I thought it would be cool to organize a meetup for folks who are interested in discussing the market, sharing information, getting to know each other etc. Please correct me if I"m wrong, didn't see any other South Bay groups on BP? 

Because I know a lot of folks debate what the South Bay is, as I understand it, we are talking about: Torrance, Palos Verdes (and RPV, Rolling Hills), Redondo Beach, Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach, Gardena, Hawthorne, Carson, Lawndale, Lomita, Harbor City, Lenox, and Inglewood. If any of those markets interest you, perhaps this would be a useful get together.

Anyhow, please reply or message me, if this would be something you'd be interested in. Would be great to get together for some coffee, and talk more in an informal setting. I'd love to try to arrange something for late August or September if folks are available. Looking forward to meeting everyone soon! 

Post: Thoughts on C-Class Neighborhoods

Shiva BhaskarPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 523
  • Votes 475

I think C areas are solid for BRRR. They are also good in any economy, to some extent. When things are good, the average working class person always needs decent housing. And when there is a downturn, you may get people who would usually live in a B area willing to live in a decent C arrange to save $$. It's a great idea if you have the right deal.

Post: How do I know if someone will rent in the area?

Shiva BhaskarPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 523
  • Votes 475
Originally posted by @Ryan Rochefort:

I was wondering how an out-of-state investor would know where the rental "areas" are in a potential location. Like what if I bought a property in a location that there were few renters? Just wondering what the key indicators are, I'm assuming that part of the investor's due diligence would be to find that out beforehand, what are some good resources? Talking to locals? Thanks BP.

 I like the idea Mike shared, of posting a listing on Craigslist to see what happens. Combine that with talking to local investors for feedback, and you should be good to go. 

Post: How to Find a REAL Investor Friendly Real Estate Agent

Shiva BhaskarPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 523
  • Votes 475
Originally posted by @Andy Chen:

I'm still a newbie, but I interviewed a broker that owns her RE business and she offered to do the following:

- Have lenders that she relies alot on that can help fund my projects.  She called up her contact at some bank and already settle on a rate that I couldn't get myself.  Still needs to do paperwork but it was WAY better than other lending firms I've called up recently + no closing cost + without credit check.

- She has several contractors in several markets and all are licensed.  She even insures them herself even though she's not a GC as she used them to build up her own office and her rehab projects.

- The rehab supplies she gets are wholesale.

- She's willing to help me incorporate.

- She's an investor herself and just recently closed no a flip that's ~$1Mil and she still does this on the side.  If I remember right she also have several commercial real estate that she owns.

- Also willing to split commission and commission rates are negotiable.

- She also have legal contacts that can help with legal issues in case one day if you want to rent out your property and get into legal trouble.

- Most importantly, she is only 1 block from my house and she always answers her phone so getting hold of her is easy.

Based on the above, is she considered a strong candidate?

 If all of this is correct, she sounds great! It's nice to have one person who offers the whole suite of experience.