All Forum Posts by: Zocky Zhang
Zocky Zhang has started 8 posts and replied 23 times.
Post: seller file for bankruptcy help

- Posts 23
- Votes 0
Originally posted by @Justin Kay:
Sure you can sue for breach of contract, but the judge isn't likely to award specific performance if the state and bank don't cooperate. But what do you win? A paper judgement against a company that can't pay it's bills. A real winning situation.
Can you force them into bankruptcy? Nope. That's called an involuntary and it doesn't pass the test. Even if it did, the court would be brutal against you and would view you as an overly aggressive creditor.
Can you force the sale in a bankruptcy? Nope. You have no rights to the property better than the bank, state, owner and other creditors.
You seem to think someone can "make" them sell it, but it doesn't work that way. Secured liens are created for just that reason (assuming the state is secured). If it didn't work that way, everyone that's about to be forclosed on would sell their home with a $100k loan for $50k on the fly.
Let them file a bankruptcy and buy it with a superior title. Or sue and piss the money away. Not much of another option.
so yes, we really have limited choice now, it's all on the seller's hand.
one thing i notice from the HUD1 provided by the title company is, there're two large sum at item 1306 and 1307 , paid to CH 11 US bankruptcy court , to be paid out of seller's fund at settlement.
does the two item means seller already start chapter 11 ?
Post: seller file for bankruptcy help

- Posts 23
- Votes 0
Originally posted by @Justin Kay:
@Zocky Zhang get a bankruptcy attorney on the line that focuses in creditor rights and pay him a few hundred dollars to ask some questions.
I don't know how MD does their Grants, but it typically involves a Grant Agreement between the State and the entity receiving the Grant. It typically isn't in the form of a lien against the property. Which means the only lien on the property should be the bank note. So the owner's goal is to file a Chapter 11 bankruptcy, and as a First Day Motion present what's called a 363 Sale Motion, where they are trying to force a sale on the property for less than the debt amount of the entity (not necessarily the land). You're the buyer. If the Judge approves the sale, the buyer gets the property, liens are satisfied at closing, and to the extent they aren't satisfied the "liens transfer to proceeds" meaning the property is free and clear.
It's actually a preferred way to buy the property, as you get a Federal Court Order saying there are no post-closing liens on the property, and you get a number of protections as the buyer (including being a BFPFV).
Alternatively, instead of selling the property to you, they may want to auction off the property to ensure they get good value. If so, tell the owner you want to be the "stalking horse bidder." Essentially, you put a bid down equal to your current offer as the starting bid (or maybe less, up to you). If you win, the property is yours. If you don't win, you get a "breakup fee" usually a few thousand or a hundred thousand dollars for "your time and effort." It's a win-win for you.
All of this is somewhat complicated bankruptcy stuff though, so get a good attorney.
thanks Justin
i will get an attorney to talk to then.
but as our contractual relationship with the seller is just the agreement of sale(AOS) so far, if we want to push forward, can we file a case in our district court and force the sale to happen then force the seller to bankruptcy and state get the remainder, net of sale amount - bank debt.?
really who got the right to force this to happen? definitely not the bank or state, since the seller still rent out the property and collect rent and pays back the mortgage. but she signed the AOS which means she has to deliver the property. or we get some sort of compensation for our architect work done to get the religious purpose approved by State previously.
thanks
Post: seller file for bankruptcy help

- Posts 23
- Votes 0
my church is buying a property in MD.
currently the property is leased to a senior care operator, owner collect 6k rent each month. it has been going for 15 years.
15 years ago owner bought the property with grant from MD State, state said if owner sell to non senior care business within in 30 years, owner need to pay back 500k. now owner still owe banks total 600k.
owner accept our offer in mid july with agreement of sale signed, no contingency on grant waived. He said he will ask MD State to waive the grant, however the grant will not be waived by State. Now owner want to file bankruptcy after realizing sale price is less than state grant and bank loan balance.
will this grant be passed to buyers? shall we sue the owner or someone to carry out this deal without an real estate lawyer?
Post: Seek damage remedy from tenant paycheck

- Posts 23
- Votes 0
i'm not sure if this remedy is too aggressive but seems in PA landlord can seek damage compensation from tenant's pay check.
does anyone have ever used this to get back the loss from tenants?
I recently paid over $4000 water bill after eviction of a tenant, can I sue the tenant for this damage and get paid from his paycheck?
Post: tenant keep water flow, end up with large water bill to landlord

- Posts 23
- Votes 0
i'm not sure if this remedy is too aggressive but seems in PA landlord can seek damage compensation from tenant's pay check.
does anyone have ever used this to get back the loss from tenants?
One thing I notice is
There is a hole in thus window screen, there is no hole on the screen of the other window in the same room, that window doesn't Jane any ant.
The window with ants is close to a tree outside the house also.
Post: Maryland PSI realtor exam state portion study material

- Posts 23
- Votes 0
i'm taking MD realtor state portion exam only since i'm converting my PA license to MD.
is there a MD state portion study material that I can download or buy somewhere?
any advice is appreciated.
thanks
Post: tenant keep water flow, end up with large water bill to landlord

- Posts 23
- Votes 0
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Have you added a clause in your lease that states the security deposit will not be returned until all the utility bills are paid completely. If so you can later deduct it from the security deposit when the tenant leaves.
yes it has, but given the fact we cannot collect more than 2 months as security deposit here in PA, i don't think it is sufficient to just cover more than 2 months of water bill, assume no other damage made to the house.
Post: tenant keep water flow, end up with large water bill to landlord

- Posts 23
- Votes 0
Originally posted by @PJ M.:
@Zocky Zhang just to clarify the water does not have to be the landlord's responsibility in Philly. It's true that the water stays in the landlord's name and that it is a lien-able item on the property, but you can pass the costs back to the tenant.
I don't include water in my rentals any more. Tenant's are responsible for all utilities. Each month the water invoice gets forwarded to the tenant and it becomes "rent due" with the next rent payment. That way if there's a $700 water bill it;s totally the tenant's responsibility.
Prior to this, I used to have it in my leases that I covered the first $30 of the water bill (this was a long time ago when water was generally included as part of the rent) and any amount over that was the tenant's responsibility. $30 at that time covered more than enough usage for a family. If anything was over $40 the same thing happened then that happens now, the bill was forwarded to the tenant with an invoice letting them know it was due with the next month;s rent.
For this, I agree with @Patricia Steiner, it's a perfect time to go in and check out the property. Make sure there isn't a leak or anything. Try and schedule it with them but if not, let them know that you consider this an emergency and will be entering to perform a leak inspection.
yes, the water is tenant's responsibility per our lease agreement, but i have heard many landlord's experience that tenant abusing water and never paid water bill before eviction and landlord end up paying 3k+ water bill, and never get the money back from tenant, though court cases are filling against tenants.
seems philly are protecting the tenants too much. definitely.