While I have not encountered this, and know there are very odd requirements placed on property owners looking to develop land, this feels a little off given there are other property owners on the road and life-safety access tends to be the top most requirement in all roadways.

Major roadways have been redone drainage has been redone and I and many others can attest to seeing very positive effects.

Indemnification As consideration of granting easements and the benefits each of the parties acknowledge as received, the parties agree to hold harmless and indemnify, each to the other, for any loss, cost, damage, expense or judgment, arising from or out of, either party's failure to maintain the roadway subject of this agreement as required or any refusal to act or in keeping with any covenants herein or under any easements granted.

Also, is there already a paved roadway to service the parcel? 

Who owns the roadway and what is the maintenance standard?

Down here the city pays for sidewalks, they don't pay for the easement as it's already taken by the roadway easement.

When you say utility lines, do you mean down the roadways? 

PenDoT has reached out to acquire a sliver of our land and lease another portion to fix a bridged road way... yet it’s seems more like a notice that they are just taking it.

You'll need more information for anything accurate; but from a very high level, I'd estimate roughly $50,000 per acre or $500 per lineal foot of new roadway. 

There is a roadway that completely encircles the building.