Skip to content
×
PRO Members Get
Full Access
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Level up your investing with Pro
Explore exclusive tools and resources to start, grow, or optimize your portfolio.
10+ investment analysis calculators
$1,000+/yr savings on landlord software
Lawyer-reviewed lease forms (annual only)
Unlimited access to the Forums

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
Results (6,293+)
Abigail Joanna Putting an offer on a duplex with a tenant in the eviction process?
4 August 2025 | 4 replies
There's no real harm in having a property under contract pending the unit being vacant or something similar.
Chaim Mal Out of state investing
6 August 2025 | 30 replies
And if the numbers still aren’t working, no harm in exploring similar cash-flow markets in other states!
Jen Carlile Incline Village - looking to be hands off investor / partner to someone else
30 July 2025 | 5 replies
🤩 I thought no harm in at least asking
Account Closed PEP fund with Lane Kawaoka
7 August 2025 | 71 replies
Personally I don’t think anyone should be banned unless they have been convicted of a crime that could harm people on this site.
Jason R. Banks willing to open accounts for a cell in a Series LLC?
30 July 2025 | 20 replies
Series LLC's are an example of an asset protection plan that probably does more harm and over complication of your business than it does good. 
David Kanarek Beware of Norada Capital: Caveat Emptor My Fellow Small Investors !!!
6 August 2025 | 104 replies
Unless you enjoy being seen as an uniformed, nasty, rude, pompous ***, the only possible explanation is that you are so self absorbed that you have no issue with harming perfect strangers to make yourself feel important.
Ashley Kehr Sellers pulling their property off the market.
22 July 2025 | 16 replies
You are correct about agent desperation which will cause long term harm to the market at large
Zachary McDonough What I wish Pace Morby would have told me
29 July 2025 | 71 replies
I guess my greatest beef with most gurus (not all, some are actually honest and straightforward, and even offer marginally beneficial advice) is the following1- they’re dishonest in numerous ways2- completing their training in no way qualifies the student to earn money or even perform competently in real property field3- the techniques they teach are often harmful to the people their students deal with4- they unleash a horde of unprepared, unqualified, unknowledgeable, misguided and unaware newbies on an unsuspecting pool of desperate homeowners5- they sell the song that all formal education is a waste of time and money6- they never provide any audited proof that they have been successful in real estate investing7- they encourage people to pay for a mentorship plan they can’t afford by increasing the limit on their credit cards8- they create falsified accounts to post how great their program is9- their programs are packaged by professional seminar companies out of Provo, Utah or Las Vegas, Nevada10- they disparage people who have spent years accumulating the knowledge, experience and capital necessary to be successful in real estate11- SOME gurus teach techniques which are unethical, immoral and even illegal. 
Travis Boyd $2,000 fee for not purchasing a property
21 July 2025 | 19 replies
The parties agree that the exact amount of Buyer’s Agent’s damages in that situation would be uncertain and difficult to accurately estimate, and the amount indicated in the previous sentence is fair compensation for and a reasonable measure of those damages in the light of the anticipated or actual harm caused by the breach, the difficulties of proof of loss, and the inconvenience or non feasibility of otherwise obtaining an adequate remedy."