Looking back on it I should have gotten an Estoppel Agreement to make sure that the terms of the lease were as the seller represented. 

Hi everyone,I’m considering buying a 2,500 sq ft commercial property with this deed restriction (in place until 2037):“Neither Grantee nor its successors, assigns or legal representatives, lessees, or sublessees, shall conduct or permit the conduct on the Property of, and the Property shall never be used for:(i) a grocery or convenience store selling at retail any food or food products, dairy products, beer, wine or other alcoholic beverages for consumption off the premises;(ii) the retail sale of any food or food products, beer, wine or other alcoholic beverages for consumption on or off the premises.”My plan is to use the space as an event venue (birthdays, weddings, baby showers, etc.), where renters bring/cater their own food and drinks.

I don't have an attorney representing me at this time.

In PA we as property managers can legally represent the seller, assuming proper documentation proving the relationship.I do not take threats of court from a tenant seriously. 

The problem is that lawyers representing DST investors first try and reach a settlement.

A crooked lawyer (hmm seems redundant) represented him pro bono.

They have been my go-to for many years and represent several suitable insurers. 

@Abel Curiel I would appreciate it if either of you could support me with a report showing currently rented units within .25 miles of 11208 @ $2700 or more 2-bed 1-bath tenant pays at least 1 or 2 utilities.A NYCHA representative informed that a lease or rent roll from another property is not required.

And consumer spending (aka consumption) represents most of our economy. 

We often represent tenants and welcome litigation where the landlord has an umbrella policy with no liability protection (ex.