And I hold this true of ALL PM's, when they have clear-cut transparency in what they offer and fee's that indicates professionalism and experience.

Here's some more information - I looked at the appraisal and the indicated value by the cost approach was $229,587.

The bifurcation indicates a need to flight to quality--assets of interest to the top 10% of the population will perform better than for the bottom 90%. 

I view my flow of processes as a river, and I scan my KPI's (key performance indicators) in order to surface and potential "dams" in my river that may obstruct my flow, and prevent me from reaching my targets.

The deal indicated that even as a second round investor, I would still be in first lien position with the JV and joinder agreements.

I was skeptical of the issue because it was an older building and there was no indication of cracking in the walls or doors that were out of alignment and would not close.

The thickness of my skin is not indicative of my desire for community and peership outside of my own echo chamber.

The fact they are complaining online might be an indication the property manager dealt with them properly so be sure to ask the manager for their side of the story.I hope this basic guide helps.

When all the top tier ratings have long reviews, that often (not always, but often) can be an indicator of incentivization or paid reviews. 

The issue isn't that a lawn company made a mistake, the issue is that the manager that owns the lawn company never indicated that they owned it, gaslighted me by saying she would have someone from the lawn company call me, when of course it was her.