Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

676
Posts
259
Votes
Sergey Tkachev
  • Investor, Agent, CPA
  • West Sacramento, CA
259
Votes |
676
Posts

Borrow against one deal to fund another - private or hard money?

Sergey Tkachev
  • Investor, Agent, CPA
  • West Sacramento, CA
Posted

I am looking at a 4-unit Sacramento, CA that a partner and I want to buy - it needs rehab and will only sell for cash.  Our plan is to purchase for cash, rehab and refinance out into a 30 year mortgage and hold it as a rental.

I would normally use my own funds for the purchase but they are sitting in a recently rehabbed property that is listed for sale.  So I'm looking for short term cash.

The rehabbed property I have listed for sale is worth more than the property we're looking to purchase.  Time is of the essence as we potentially need to show proof of funds next week and close within a short period of time.  The seller is a bank.

Here are my questions:

1) Would you use (a) the property being purchased as the collateral or (b) the property that is already rehabbed and waiting to be sold?  Using the rehabbed property will likely speed up the borrowing process but is it worth tying it up to make the purchase of another property?  Once the property sells the lender can be paid back right away.

2) Would you go with a private lender or hard money, assuming private lenders will likely be less expensive but may not be as quick as a hard money lender?  Or maybe I am wrong on that assumption?  I am still looking for both available options.

3) Is using a hard money lender even a viable option when purchasing from a bank?  

4) What other options are out there?

I'm interested to hear what others would do.  My gut feeling is telling me it would be better to use a private lender as opposed to hard money.  

P.S. - I understand that a lot more goes into the equation but I'm trying to keep it short and to the point.  Let me know if I should clarify anything to make more sense :)

  • Sergey Tkachev
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    60
    Posts
    88
    Votes
    Bill Thompson
    • Rental Property Investor
    • Jamaica Plain, MA
    88
    Votes |
    60
    Posts
    Bill Thompson
    • Rental Property Investor
    • Jamaica Plain, MA
    Replied

    Sergey, if you need to move fast, hard money is your best option. A hard money lender will require you to have skin in the game so expect come up with 30% of ARV out of your own pocket.

    Yes, hard money is very expensive but totally worth it for buying distressed properties.  I find that distressed properties tend to get snapped-up quickly by bottom feeders looking for a deal.  Have you ever lost a deal to a so-called cash buyer?  Many of the cash buyers out there are not sitting on a ton of cash... they use hard money.  Do yourself a favor and establish a relationship with a reputable hard money lender. They can provide proof of funds letters so that you can make strong cash offers on prospective deals.  You can use an all-cash offer as leverage to achieve a lower purchase price.  

    One key point to consider is you must be able to "get in and get out" fast.  Hard money is not appropriate if you anticipating a long holding period before being able to sell or refinance-out.

  • Bill Thompson
  • Loading replies...