Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Classifieds
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

218
Posts
82
Votes
Ranjit Sandhu
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Rocklin, CA
82
Votes |
218
Posts

Escrow officer and lender missed lien and closed the deal

Ranjit Sandhu
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Rocklin, CA
Posted

Hello lawyers in Northern California! Closed deal (SFR) couple months back and I was representing a buyer. Everyone missed PACE lien which had a link on pre-lim report. Escrow officer missed it as well lender missed it too. Seller did not disclose that he took loan when he built something in the property. When buyer received property tax bill last month he noticed it was big amount under Mello roos. When contacted escrow/title company even after closing escrow officer kept saying it was for solar, even though new owner assumed lease for solar, so it was not for solar. Buyer contacted high up title company and they declined and stated because new owner signed the pre-lim nothing they can do. The last resort is to sue seller because seller failed to disclose on SPQ/TDS. But before suing seller new owner filked a title claim let's see how it goes. Any advise?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,488
Posts
3,445
Votes
Tom Gimer
  • DMV
3,445
Votes |
3,488
Posts
Tom Gimer
  • DMV
Replied

Thanks for the tag, @Russell Brazil. The existence of a PACE-related special assessment should have been obvious from the tax bill. That would seem to fall under the category of buyer due diligence.

But regardless of that... since with PACE the financed package of energy improvements should be designed to at least pay for itself over the term of the assessment, what are the buyer's damages?

Taxes and assessments for future years are never covered under a title policy... of course now that I said "never" @Peter Walther will probably correct me on that!

  • Tom Gimer
business profile image
Gimer Law
5.0 stars
3 Reviews

Loading replies...