Skip to content
×
PRO Members Get
Full Access
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Level up your investing with Pro
Explore exclusive tools and resources to start, grow, or optimize your portfolio.
10+ investment analysis calculators
$1,000+/yr savings on landlord software
Lawyer-reviewed lease forms (annual only)
Unlimited access to the Forums

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 6 months ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
3
Votes |
15
Posts

Landlord insurance coverage for Chicago non legal units

Account Closed
Posted

Can somebody shed some light on how Landlord insurance deals with coverage of these illegal basement units in Chicago? 
Do they provide coverage regardless whether is a legal unit or not?

Can they pull out of paying a claim if it was triggered due to an event that originated from that basement non legal unit? 

Thank you in advance for your responses. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

34
Posts
26
Votes
Andrew Bish
  • Insurance Agent
  • Chicago
26
Votes |
34
Posts
Andrew Bish
  • Insurance Agent
  • Chicago
Replied
Quote from @Jonathan Klemm:

Appreciate the additional informatin @Andrew Bish!

Can you explain exactly how this "Ordinance or law coverage" works?  I've never heard of this before....this is completely separate from an umbrella policy, right?  How much would the additional premium be?

Also, good call sharing the Chicago non-conforming ordinance, which is a bit confusing and hard to read, but worth the time to review!


Absolutely. To start it is separate from an umbrella. The umbrella is a separate policy that deals with the liability aspect, helps protect you if you are sued. Ordinance or law coverage deals with the physical damage aspect and exists as an optional add-on to a landlord or homeowners policy. Both are usually recommended, however, neither are required. 

The main reason to add this coverage is because a standard policy excludes any loss or increased cost that results from the enforcement of a code, an ordinance, or a law that regulates or requires the construction, demolition, remodeling, renovation, or repair of property or the removal of its debris. This exclusion works as a bit of a catch-all saying, we're not insuring illegal structures. However, what about structures grandfathered into modern building codes? They are fine to continue being occupied according to the local ordinance, but you cannot build new non-conformities. 

The amount of insurance for your building is determined by what the insurance company determines it would cost to rebuild your building in "like kind and quality" or the replacement cost. Since you cannot build new non-conformities, if your building was destroyed, your insurance company would not be able to deliver you a new building in the same quality and condition it was before destruction. They would have rebuild the building in accordance with modern ordinance or laws. This would at least require additional building materials and may necessitate other soft costs associated with redesigning the building. 

This is not the most expensive add-on you can get. Just to throw a few number out there I have a quote pulled up, premium is $1800, replacement cost is about $480k, taking the additional 10% ordinance or law coverage is only $70, and if I remember correctly the home is 1950s or so. Of course this could depend on many factors but it is not the most outrageous endorsement. 

Loading replies...