Updated over 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

Investing in High-Cost vs Low-Cost Markets, Which Makes You Rich?
Just wrote this, this is especially relevant for Californians. Would like to know your opinions.
Most Popular Reply

My path 4 years ago was to buy 25 lower cost homes, versus 5 median priced homes with the same money. Today - perhaps through lucky timing - some of those homes have doubled and tripled in value. We can now sell off our least favorite properties without significantly affecting our monthly net income. We have used the proceeds to go from 19 mortgages to 9. Much of that was through consolidation, but also included taking our older mortgage rates from the mid-5’s to the mid to high 3’s… obviously before rates started jumping back up.
Yes, the cost of acquisition and upkeep of our portfolio is higher than had we went the high road - so it is more effort (more closing costs, tenants, roofs, toilets, plumbers, AC calls, but if you factor in appreciation, flexibility of choices on portfolio, I still think it is the smarter path. And appreciation really is under-valued. We are netting an extra 6 figures over what we paid for houses 3-4 years ago.
I think you do what the numbers tell you to do as to what your plan is. Low rates - buy and refinance. High prices - sell and take some money and profits off the table. We are in our early 50’s and by 60 we want to be portfolio debt free with enough REI income to turn the portfolio over to property management - which currently isn’t necessary for us. It’s really pretty stable and easy. 95% of any regular issues are solved with a phone call.
Randy