Quote from @Paul Azad:
How the Ashcroft Capital Lawsuit Is Shaping the Future of Real Estate Syndication - Heralds Post
poorly written piffle, probable AI bot article about Ashford, no reference to the risk disclosures in the Offering Memorandum/Partnership Agreement, which is the whole legal case. ie, did they disclose all reasonably foreseeable risks of the investments. real estate clickbait.
Ashford acted like hundreds of other Multi-family syndicators, greedy to keep dancing while the music played rather than grab a seat in 2020 or 2021 before the music stopped in 2022, after the most easily foreseen and predicted rate rise in US history, following inflation by Trump mailing out 3.8 Trillion directly to the people. Investors/LPs due to their usual combo of profound ignorance and even more profound greed kept dancing well after the music stopped and a deafening silence could be heard by anyone qualified to hear.
The problem : >95% of Americans are not qualified/educated enough to buy real estate, nor any private company, nor any public company. The current law that sets "accredited investor" was written by Congress - Regulation D in 1982,
"Net worth must exceed $1 million (excluding the value of a primary residence), or individual annual income must exceed $200,000 (or $300,000 for married couples) in each of the two previous years", and it hasn't been adjusted for inflation since. Tens of millions of people meet these incredibly low standards, and an inflation adjustment alone to 2025 would take these up to about 3.5 million net worth and 600K income alone, which still wouldn't add what's needed which is a rigorous experience component or extensive written exam. Heck, I had to fill out a 2 page form and pass an eye exam last week at the DPS to renew my driver's license.
sorry just venting now. :)
The average American investor in public companies earns about 1/3rd the return of the sp500, (JPMorgan wealth management study) which is just blindly buying the 500 biggest US companies. If they can't be trusted to buy stocks how can we trust almost anyone to comprehend CRE/macroeconomics/200 page offering memoranda etc. maybe we shouldn't.
Happy Mother's Day🤠
The accredited investor thresholds—$1 million in net worth (excluding primary residence) and $200,000 in annual income ($300,000 for couples)—were established by the SEC in 1982 and have remained unchanged since then.
Adjusting for inflation, these thresholds would be significantly higher today. According to the SEC's 2023 review, if adjusted using the Consumer Price Index (CPI), the thresholds would approximate:
I am of the opposite mind of most - maybe this is because I have a Reg A+ offering that requires a lot of reporting, but I think the definition of accredited should be increased to make it a lot harder for people to invest in 506c as there are other avenues like Reg A+ that can allow non accredited investors and require reporting. In that instance it will force people to go the route that requires added reporting which should be more beneficial for the investor - of course they still actually have to be able to read the docs.